You just proved my point. Impossible for anybody but Jesus
There is none righteous, not one -Luke 1
5 There was in the days of Herod, the king of Judea, a certain priest named Zacharias, of the division of Abijah. His wife was of the daughters of Aaron, and her name was Elizabeth.
6 And they were both righteous before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless.
Perhaps you've missed these passages. It was possible for Zacharias and Elizabeth. And they were righteous before God.
There is none righteous, not one -
Romans 3:10 -
God imputes righteousness, we can't be righteous enough on our own.Luke 1
5 There was in the days of Herod, the king of Judea, a certain priest named Zacharias, of the division of Abijah. His wife was of the daughters of Aaron, and her name was Elizabeth.
6 And they were both righteous before God, walking in all the commandments and ordinances of the Lord blameless.
Perhaps you've missed these passages. It was possible for Zacharias and Elizabeth. And they were righteous before God.
BlashphemyEvery single law can be obeyed correctly, so anyone can fulfill the whole law.
James 2:10 -Every single law can be obeyed correctly, so anyone can fulfill the whole law.
Blashphemy
James 2:10 -
There is none righteous, not one -
Romans 3:10 -
Brother Patrick,There is none righteous, not one -
Romans 3:10 -
Brother Patrick,
Romans 3:10-18 is hyperbole. They are exagerations to make a point. One of the tests to determine if a passage contains this style of communication is to ask the question, is it true?
Paul was using hyperbole to emphasize his point from verse 9 –all "are under sin". He then proceeded to unpack one exageration after another to make his case.
We do the same in our language. For example, consider the sentence, "John is always working". Of course John doesn't work 24/7. That was not the point. It's that he works often.
The first exaggeration from Paul was "none is righteous, no, not one" (v. 10b). If not, this would make the believing recipients of this letter unsaved, to include everyone saved at Pentecost –to include Paul himself.
The book of Romans has been summarized as "the righteousness of God". How could Paul write this book unless he was righteous? Ironically, in the same chapter (3), Paul writes about the righteousness of God that makes people righteous (3:21).
It wasn't Paul's point that no righteous people have ever existed (Romans 4:3). He was describing mankind as a whole. We "all have sinned and fall short".
In Christ!
Brother Soyeong,Every single law can be obeyed correctly, so anyone can fulfill the whole law.
All imputed by God - imputed, accounted as, counted as - look it upI just showed you Zacharias and Elizabeth were righteous before God.
God said Abraham was righteous.
Genesis 7:1
Then the Lord said to Noah, “Come into the ark, you and all your household, because I have seen that you are righteous before Me in this generation.
Abraham believed there were righteous people.
Genesis 18:23
And Abraham came near and said, “Would You also destroy the righteous with the wicked?
God said there were righteous people.
Exodus 23
6 “You shall not pervert the judgment of your poor in his dispute.
7 Keep yourself far from a false matter; do not kill the innocent and righteous. For I will not justify the wicked.
Solomon said there were righteous people.
1 Kings 8:32
Then hear in heaven, and act, and judge Your servants, condemning the wicked, bringing his way on his head, and justifying the righteous by giving him according to his righteousness.
How is it you don't believe what the Bible says? I just gave you three witnesses.
I agree. There are many righteous folks. Many even post on this forum. They are righteous, and they aren't afraid to tell you so; however, something else can be said of these people. . . Jesus didn't come for them.
"I have not come to call the righteous but sinners to repentance.” (Luke 5:32)
While I commend them for their commitment to sanctification
Brother thatbrain,I differ on this. I don't commend them. I pity them, as they have severed themselves from Christ by refusing His righteousness to retain their own. Paul had a good deal to say on this subject, and not much was in the way on commendation.
Pharisees, at best, were righteous on the outside only, white-washed tombs. Jesus is telling us that the problem of sin is much deeper-it starts in the heart. Get the inside right and the rest will follow accordingly. Gods purpose has always been to restore justice to His creation, never to ignore it. This is why Jesus said that He didn't come to abolish the law. As we humbly bow before God in faith, the New Covenant prophecies of Jer 31 begin to be fulfilled in us; relationship with God is reestablished and He begins to do a work in us-of placing His law in our hearts and writing it on our minds, infusing His righteousness in us. This is grace, won on the cross, man being reconciled with God, apart from Whom we can do nothing (John 15:5), but with Whom all things are possible (Matt 19:26)."For I tell you, unless your righteousness exceeds that of the scribes and Pharisees, you will never enter the kingdom of heaven."
Was Jesus urging us to try harder and do more when he said this?
All imputed by God - imputed, accounted as, counted as - look it up
First of all, Paul said God justifies the ungodly. This does not agree with God's own words.