ValleyGal
Well-Known Member
This is a narrow brush....there are those who use their disabilities as excuses to disengage when the conversation gets too much for them. So when it is conveniently used to disengage by the person himself ("well, I have a brain injury, so...."), then intellectual conversations can be easily dismissed by that same conclusion from those he is conversing with. Fair? I'm sure it's not, but why start a conversation at a scholarly level when you can't actually converse about it? Why make assertions when there is nothing but opinion to back up those assertions (even logically)? Yes, there are a lot of very intellectual brain-injured people out there....my husband had a head injury when he was in his teens and he is graduating with a master's degree soon. But when it is repeatedly used as an excuse, well, maybe fair game.Aww, broad brushes. I had a massive pontine stroke some years back. I'm technically brain damaged with an ABI, but all cognitive testing suggests my standardised IQ is the same as it ever was. Yes, yes, anecdotal, single data points aren't conclusive of anything, but felt it worth mentioning.
Upvote
0