Don't forget primordial single cell universal common ancestor and stone age ape man myths. Darwinians don't have a monopoly on presuppositional bias, anyone can use that kind of satirical, ad hominem taunt.
Science is an inductive methodology, not a transcendent universal common cause. Your conflating and equivocating your naturalistic assumptions with science, Darwinism has never been about evidence, much less proof, it's fallacious logic and arguments from credulity who consider their intellect superior to God. If you have so much evidence why do you use presuppositional, fallacious logic exclusively?
Yet theistic reason has access to the exact same evidence and comes to a different philosophy of natural history, it's called epistemology, it's philosophically broader and deeper rationally. But you can continue to swim on the surface, it makes this all too easy that way and kind of fun.
That's called an argument from credulity, Francis Bacon, the father of inductive science, speaks elegantly against that kind of fallacious logic:
Idols of the Theater are those which are due to sophistry and false learning. These idols are built up in the field of theology, philosophy, and science, and because they are defended by learned groups are accepted without question by the masses. When false philosophies have been cultivated and have attained a wide sphere of dominion in the world of the intellect they are no longer questioned. False superstructures are raised on false foundations, and in the end systems barren of merit parade their grandeur on the stage of the world.
A careful reading of the Novum Organum will show. Bacon used the theater with its curtain and its properties as a symbol of the world stage. (The Four Idols of Francis Bacon & The New Instrument of Knowledge)
Your standing in an empty theater, preaching to row after row of dusty empty seats. Laughter can be heard from the balcony, the creationists are gone, the Darwinians are gone. It's only you and me and I'm eating popcorn watching you guys perform for one another and throwing milk duds and laughing.
Their are no other gods, the god of this world has blinded the eyes of the unbelieving:
No, but the sacrifices of pagans are offered to demons, not to God, and I do not want you to be participants with demons. (1 Cor. 10:20)
For all the gods of the nations are idols, but the LORD made the heavens.(Psalm 96:5)
The god of this age has blinded the minds of unbelievers, so that they cannot see the light of the gospel that displays the glory of Christ, who is the image of God. (2 Cor. 4:4)
And you know it:
For although they knew God, they neither glorified him as God nor gave thanks to him, but their thinking became futile and their foolish hearts were darkened. Although they claimed to be wise, they became fools and exchanged the glory of the immortal God for images made to look like a mortal human being and birds and animals and reptiles. (Rom. 1:21-23)
That's attributing to nature what is rightfully attributed to God. That's why the establishment clause bars creation and intelligent design from being taught in public schools. Everyone knows the Creator and designer is God. Ever notice that philosophical atheism never defines God, that's because everyone already knows what God is like.
You mean your presuppositional logic is the only rational worldview of natural history going all the way back to and including the Big Bang. That's not science, it Darwinism.
That's because you don't examine actual evidence, just argue in circles around it.
That's because you don't use logic, don't allow the inverse logic or your naturalistic paradigm and fixate of fallacious rhetoric exclusively.
What you are arguing from comes before evidence, theory or natural laws. You've replace God as the primary mover with naturalistic presuppositions and you preach an old myth. All the pagan mythologies went back to primordial elementals, earth, air, fire or water.
When in the height heaven was not named,
And the Earth beneath did not yet bear a name,
And the primeval Apsu, who begat them,
And chaos, Tiamut, the mother of them both
Their waters were mingled together,
And no field was formed, no marsh was to be seen;
When of the gods none had been called into being,
And none bore a name, and no destinies were ordained;
Then were created the gods in the midst of heaven,
Lahmu and Lahamu were called into being... (Enuma Elish)
Modern atheists and agnostics think they invented something new, attributing to nature what is rightfully attributed to God is very old. All pagan mythology is based on the same naturalistic presupposition.
In regard to the making of the universe and the creation of all things there have been various opinions, and each person has propounded the theory that suited his own taste. For instance, some say that all things are self- originated and, so to speak, haphazard. The Epicureans are among these; they deny that there is any Mind behind the universe at all. This view is contrary to all the facts of experience, their own existence included. For if all things had come into being in this automatic fashion, instead of being the outcome of Mind, though they existed, they would all be uniform and without distinction. (On the Incarnation De Incarnatione Verbi Dei By: St. Athanasius 296–373 AD)
Nothing new under the sun, you think your superior to mythographers when in fact, you are an apologist for them. The Darwins, Dawkins, Leakeys, Huxleys, Spencer, Gray and Dennet, mythographers all.
Have a nice day
Mark
