Global Warming Is NOT The Real Problem Behind
The Current Meltdown of the Earths Polar Ice Caps
By Bruce D. McKay, Elijah
The logic behind global warming and the scientific studies and debates on potential climate change has ignored almost any and all prospects of any kind of global catastrophes. Nevertheless, it is now evident that the mantle inside the earth is whats warming up, as if it were somehow on fire. Ski lodges around the world ended up sending all their patrons up to the higher slopes this winter, because the ice has been melting beneath the snow, on many of the lower slopes. Hence, the sciences have wrongly focused on a greenhouse effect, as if a changing of gases in the atmosphere was the basic cause for what has at first been perceived as the basic cause, for a gradual increase in global temperatures! The real basis for that false scenario as is proven in this report is that the basic line of reasoning fails to address a more historic climatic scenario, or the issue of a fearful constellation as being what truly causes the more severe changes in this Earth and its climate. In addition, the scientific community has always tended to ignore the fact that the climate of this earth has been officially proven to have been repeatedly shifted, abruptly and dramatically in the relatively recent past.
What is the real problem? The following are a few well-aimed flashes of lightening, in that regard. The real problem is there has been a system of thinking imposed upon the intellectual minds of this world, by those who set up the natural sciences and the current system is one of theoretical intellectualizing. The current scheme, i.e., our rules of geology were in a like manner, set up or postulated almost 200 years ago, in the days of Charles Lyell; All the confusion has happened, simply because, all the logic has been allowed to develop according to the idea that the history of the earth had NOT included any sweeping, geological catastrophes. In brief, the idea of a vast geological time frame overtook the issue of massive floods, or what was known as Werners floods, and anything like Huttons rivers of fire, all began to fall and fade away, being set aside as mere myths, as the supposedly true dictates of what is yet known as geological evolution began to surface. This is what basically set or posed all the wisdom of scientific thinking, in competition with the wisdom of God. And now comes an article titled Abrupt Climate Change: Should We Be Worried? by Robert B. Gagosian, President and Director of the highly prestigious, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. In this article he writes:
Fossil evidence clearly demonstrates that Earth vs. climate can shift gears within a decade, establishing new and different patterns that can persist for decades to centuries. In addition, these climate shifts do not necessarily have universal, global effects. They can generate a counter intuitive scenario: Even as the earth as a whole continues to warm gradually, large regions may experience a precipitous and disruptive shift into colder climates.
This is a new paradigm, according to the President and Director of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. If it is, a new paradigm, (according to what President Robert B. Gagosian has written) then what is there to be said ancient Biblical teachings? We now need to consider what these incredible details all mean in terms of the rather poor and unfortunate Charles Lyell, since it was Lyell who avowed himself to do away with the successive acts of the creation! Now, the tables have turned! What all this means is that now, all creation has become a weapon, to repulse all foes! Obviously, all this also means that Lyells real intent was to simply use his principles of geology, relating to a slow and steady alteration of the earths surface, as a subtle means to discredit any biblical references to dramatic global changes.
This new paradigm of abrupt climate change has been well established over the last decade by research of ocean, earth and atmosphere scientists at many institutions worldwide. But the concept remains little known and scarcely appreciated in the wider community of scientists, economists, policy makers, and world political and business leaders. Thus, world leaders may be planning for climate scenarios of global warming that are opposite to what might actually occur. Note: These are the very words quoted in that written by Robert B. Gagosian.
Now according to Charles Lyell, what all the other scientists thought to be global catastrophes were only descriptive and deluding pictures! Obviously, that was all wrong. According to Lyell and his entire system of logic, nature could only be viewed properly, as having worked upon the earths crust over enormously long periods of time, by the agencies of water and ice, or an occasional volcano in a type of geological convulsion. By looking at the melt down now taking place involving both of the earths poles, we are forced to conclude Lyell was wrong. Nevertheless, this was the way, according to Lyell, that the whole earth very slowly changed in its appearance, over many millions of years of time, without there ever being any truly massive or destructive onslaughts ever taking place. While scientists cling to Lyells idea of a vast geological time frame has been used to supposedly validate a theoretical worldview of a planet that has never been struck with and widespread geological disasters for many hundred thousands of years! And since men had only been able to observe the effects and not the process of such change, according to Lyell, everyone had erroneously inferred that geological revolutions must have taken place! In other words, according to Lyell, Gods hand was never involved in anything that ever happened - and all this means that the whole world is supposedly many millions and millions of years old, far older in fact, than what anyone had ever supposed it to be!
What all this is referring to is that the logic of Charles Lyell and much of the logic of the natural sciences is actually only a unique system of memorizations and hopefully sound, theoretical Intellectualizing(s). And - the major problem is, in short, if you dont want to think like everyone else is thinking, you arent welcome to play the game. It is a form of theorizing, highly depended on memorization, which supports this realm of thinking, and it is so natural that few persons have ever recognized that it also has some inherent and highly dangerous disadvantages. (Personally, I have learned to actually doubt that there is any real way for those who are a product of this natural system of learning, to even attempt to test those who emerge from a realm outside of their own, regular norm.) Nor is the logic and debates or the potential climate against any type of change, the first to have ignored all other prospects or explanations. For example, when Lord Kelvin was a student at Cambridge, he produced several original papers in the branches of higher mathematics. Nevertheless, his great intellect was not noted. It did not show through, even on his final exams. When tested, his test even indicated that he should be in less advanced classes! Those who administered the tests were puzzled, since they were aware of his tremendous intellectual abilities. After comparing their past experiences with his tests, they reached an incredible conclusion. He had done poorly on their ordinary series of examinations because there was only a test of memory, following after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, rather than there being any test of true originality. You and I, remarked one of his examiners to another, are just about fit to mend his pens.
In other words, the real mark of a genius is that a man thinks, beyond the mere realm of memorization, and he often thinks in quite un-ordinary terms. Nor are those persons recognized by exams! Those who design the exams often have no real method or real understanding, and to decipher whats going on, overall, is often completely beyond their intellectual reach. Therefore, the forward progress of any society is always limited in a general way, to the extent that unrecognized genius is permitted or is not permitted to be heard. Hence, when history proves that none have truly made or produced the proper hopeful solution(s), needed to solve a given problem, or some otherwise unrecognizable or hitherto unsolvable problem(s); it often takes someone with a totally different outside perspective to un-block the overall progress of human development.
The Current Meltdown of the Earths Polar Ice Caps
By Bruce D. McKay, Elijah
The logic behind global warming and the scientific studies and debates on potential climate change has ignored almost any and all prospects of any kind of global catastrophes. Nevertheless, it is now evident that the mantle inside the earth is whats warming up, as if it were somehow on fire. Ski lodges around the world ended up sending all their patrons up to the higher slopes this winter, because the ice has been melting beneath the snow, on many of the lower slopes. Hence, the sciences have wrongly focused on a greenhouse effect, as if a changing of gases in the atmosphere was the basic cause for what has at first been perceived as the basic cause, for a gradual increase in global temperatures! The real basis for that false scenario as is proven in this report is that the basic line of reasoning fails to address a more historic climatic scenario, or the issue of a fearful constellation as being what truly causes the more severe changes in this Earth and its climate. In addition, the scientific community has always tended to ignore the fact that the climate of this earth has been officially proven to have been repeatedly shifted, abruptly and dramatically in the relatively recent past.
What is the real problem? The following are a few well-aimed flashes of lightening, in that regard. The real problem is there has been a system of thinking imposed upon the intellectual minds of this world, by those who set up the natural sciences and the current system is one of theoretical intellectualizing. The current scheme, i.e., our rules of geology were in a like manner, set up or postulated almost 200 years ago, in the days of Charles Lyell; All the confusion has happened, simply because, all the logic has been allowed to develop according to the idea that the history of the earth had NOT included any sweeping, geological catastrophes. In brief, the idea of a vast geological time frame overtook the issue of massive floods, or what was known as Werners floods, and anything like Huttons rivers of fire, all began to fall and fade away, being set aside as mere myths, as the supposedly true dictates of what is yet known as geological evolution began to surface. This is what basically set or posed all the wisdom of scientific thinking, in competition with the wisdom of God. And now comes an article titled Abrupt Climate Change: Should We Be Worried? by Robert B. Gagosian, President and Director of the highly prestigious, Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. In this article he writes:
Fossil evidence clearly demonstrates that Earth vs. climate can shift gears within a decade, establishing new and different patterns that can persist for decades to centuries. In addition, these climate shifts do not necessarily have universal, global effects. They can generate a counter intuitive scenario: Even as the earth as a whole continues to warm gradually, large regions may experience a precipitous and disruptive shift into colder climates.
This is a new paradigm, according to the President and Director of the Woods Hole Oceanographic Institution. If it is, a new paradigm, (according to what President Robert B. Gagosian has written) then what is there to be said ancient Biblical teachings? We now need to consider what these incredible details all mean in terms of the rather poor and unfortunate Charles Lyell, since it was Lyell who avowed himself to do away with the successive acts of the creation! Now, the tables have turned! What all this means is that now, all creation has become a weapon, to repulse all foes! Obviously, all this also means that Lyells real intent was to simply use his principles of geology, relating to a slow and steady alteration of the earths surface, as a subtle means to discredit any biblical references to dramatic global changes.
This new paradigm of abrupt climate change has been well established over the last decade by research of ocean, earth and atmosphere scientists at many institutions worldwide. But the concept remains little known and scarcely appreciated in the wider community of scientists, economists, policy makers, and world political and business leaders. Thus, world leaders may be planning for climate scenarios of global warming that are opposite to what might actually occur. Note: These are the very words quoted in that written by Robert B. Gagosian.
Now according to Charles Lyell, what all the other scientists thought to be global catastrophes were only descriptive and deluding pictures! Obviously, that was all wrong. According to Lyell and his entire system of logic, nature could only be viewed properly, as having worked upon the earths crust over enormously long periods of time, by the agencies of water and ice, or an occasional volcano in a type of geological convulsion. By looking at the melt down now taking place involving both of the earths poles, we are forced to conclude Lyell was wrong. Nevertheless, this was the way, according to Lyell, that the whole earth very slowly changed in its appearance, over many millions of years of time, without there ever being any truly massive or destructive onslaughts ever taking place. While scientists cling to Lyells idea of a vast geological time frame has been used to supposedly validate a theoretical worldview of a planet that has never been struck with and widespread geological disasters for many hundred thousands of years! And since men had only been able to observe the effects and not the process of such change, according to Lyell, everyone had erroneously inferred that geological revolutions must have taken place! In other words, according to Lyell, Gods hand was never involved in anything that ever happened - and all this means that the whole world is supposedly many millions and millions of years old, far older in fact, than what anyone had ever supposed it to be!
What all this is referring to is that the logic of Charles Lyell and much of the logic of the natural sciences is actually only a unique system of memorizations and hopefully sound, theoretical Intellectualizing(s). And - the major problem is, in short, if you dont want to think like everyone else is thinking, you arent welcome to play the game. It is a form of theorizing, highly depended on memorization, which supports this realm of thinking, and it is so natural that few persons have ever recognized that it also has some inherent and highly dangerous disadvantages. (Personally, I have learned to actually doubt that there is any real way for those who are a product of this natural system of learning, to even attempt to test those who emerge from a realm outside of their own, regular norm.) Nor is the logic and debates or the potential climate against any type of change, the first to have ignored all other prospects or explanations. For example, when Lord Kelvin was a student at Cambridge, he produced several original papers in the branches of higher mathematics. Nevertheless, his great intellect was not noted. It did not show through, even on his final exams. When tested, his test even indicated that he should be in less advanced classes! Those who administered the tests were puzzled, since they were aware of his tremendous intellectual abilities. After comparing their past experiences with his tests, they reached an incredible conclusion. He had done poorly on their ordinary series of examinations because there was only a test of memory, following after the tradition of men, after the rudiments of the world, rather than there being any test of true originality. You and I, remarked one of his examiners to another, are just about fit to mend his pens.
In other words, the real mark of a genius is that a man thinks, beyond the mere realm of memorization, and he often thinks in quite un-ordinary terms. Nor are those persons recognized by exams! Those who design the exams often have no real method or real understanding, and to decipher whats going on, overall, is often completely beyond their intellectual reach. Therefore, the forward progress of any society is always limited in a general way, to the extent that unrecognized genius is permitted or is not permitted to be heard. Hence, when history proves that none have truly made or produced the proper hopeful solution(s), needed to solve a given problem, or some otherwise unrecognizable or hitherto unsolvable problem(s); it often takes someone with a totally different outside perspective to un-block the overall progress of human development.
