Oncedeceived
Senior Veteran
That is the problem you never seem to think a burden rests on your claim but it does. The appearance that life forms are designed for a purpose is the evidence if one wishes to claim that evidence is explained by it being an illusion it is your burden to support that claim.Discussion is not all about shifting the burden of evidence to the other guy.
The evidence is what it is. In our experience, we find that things that we know are designed by intelligent agents have certain properties and things that we know are not designed by intelligent agents don't have those properties; therefore, when presented with something of unknown history, if it has properties of a designed thing, we can inductively conclude they are designed by an intelligent agent.Back to the appearance of a face on that cliff; how would you show that something only appears designed? Is that possible to do, or not?
Upvote
0