Siliconaut
Not to be confused with the other Norman Hartnell
@John: Not proven to be genuine writing, but definitely research-worthy. However, the symbols were clearly made with deliberate intent and - if not writing - are remarkably similar in their stylizedness. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/2956925.stm
I messed up badly, though - my memory seems to be playing tricks on me. The writings have been found in china, not mesopotamia, and the age is about 8.600 years, not just 8.000...
I messed up badly, though - my memory seems to be playing tricks on me. The writings have been found in china, not mesopotamia, and the age is about 8.600 years, not just 8.000...
Upvote
0