Ummm, excuse me, but in case you were not aware of it - it was a creationist that started the Big Bang theory.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Georges_Lemaître
"was a Belgian priest, astronomer and professor of physics at the Catholic University of Leuven. He proposed (independently of Russian physicist Alexander Friedman) the theory of the expansion of the universe, widely misattributed to Edwin Hubble. He was the first to derive what is now known as Hubble's law and made the first estimation of what is now called the Hubble constant, which he published in 1927, two years before Hubble's article. Lemaître also proposed what became known as the Big Bang theory of the origin of the Universe, which he called his "hypothesis of the primeval atom" or the "Cosmic Egg".
Which just tells me how much most really understand of it. So believe me when I say if I wanted to accept that obviously flawed creation theory being a creationist myself - the Big Bang would be the first stop on the list. It's flawed because it's wrong, because of their misconceptions of redshift.
Because the modern view of the universe is just as flawed as was the then modern view of the universe when the Milky-Way was the entire universe. Or before that the modern view of when the earth was the center.
It's simply because cosmologists refuse to treat plasma like it is treated in every single laboratory by plasma physicists. Instead expecting it to behave by physics for solids, liquids and gasses.