Alas I fear you have failed to understand my post. My point is that whereas it is proper to search for Christological prophecy in the Old Testament, we should not presume to judge books of the New Testament against it.
So in other words, one can piously search the Old Testament for confirmation of the New. One should not however attempt to revise the New on the basis of perceived conflicts with a Rabinnical, Karaite or other Judaic intepretation of the Old.
Which is precisely what you and Jarooshalom are doing in asking us to reject St. Paul.
I do not ask you to reject St. Paul, rather I ask you to prove St. Paul using the same criteria the first Christians and modern day Jews use to prove Jesus.
Now is your chance to emulate St. Paul by 'being all things to all people'. A Gentile may accept the New Testament at face value, however for a Jew it must be proved by the Tanakh. I'm sure even St. Paul would encourage you to prove his message by the Tanakh.
!Come on make Paul proud!
Upvote
0