Did Jesus Warn Us of the "Christ" Paul Met in the Wilderness?

[Jahrooshshalom]

Jesus in Matt 24:4-5, 24-27 warned about a false Christ coming in His name of Jesus. Our Lord told us we should not trust anyone who claims a wilderness experience because the true Jesus would be seen by every eye on earth when He returns. This video in detail.

A friend who patronizes a Bible study forum sent me these video linked together. An interesting premise as far as controversial theology goes in Christian doctrine.
Paul wrote about 2/3rds of the new testament in the form of his letters. While the disciples that walked with Christ have but few in comparison.

Wouldn't that be something? If the world is in the state it is in today because the teachings we've been following were not wholly-holy that of Jesus and his words alone?

 

[DrBubbaLove]

Or if pigs could fly! Don't forget that.

 

[Neochristian]

You can tell a tree by its fruits. Read 1 Corinthians 13. Those words could not come from anyone who wasn't truly godly. Paul is legit.

 

[DrBubbaLove]

I think the story could lead on Art Bell however.

 

[patrick jane]

Nah, Paul was a chosen vessel, and Ananias was a witness, as was Barnabas and all the Apostles. Paul rose Eutychus from the dead and performed many miracles. It was testified and understood that Paul was to be sent to the Gentiles and Peter to the circumcision



Galatians 2:7 - Galatians 2:8 -



Acts 9:15-16 - But the Lord said unto him, Go thy way: for he is a chosen vessel unto me, to bear my name before the Gentiles, and kings, and the children of Israel: 16 For I will shew him how great things he must suffer for my names sake.

And Paul did

 

[patrick jane]

John 21:25

 

[patrick jane]

Galatians 2:9 - Galatians 2:11 KJV - But when Peter was come to Antioch, I withstood him to the face, because he was to be blamed.



Galatians 2:16

 

[patrick jane]

Jesus in Matt 24:4-5, 24-27 warned about a false Christ coming in His name of Jesus. Our Lord told us we should not trust anyone who claims a wilderness experience because the true Jesus would be seen by every eye on earth when He returns. This video in detail.

A friend who patronizes a Bible study forum sent me these video linked together. An interesting premise as far as controversial theology goes in Christian doctrine.
Paul wrote about 2/3rds of the new testament in the form of his letters. While the disciples that walked with Christ have but few in comparison.

Wouldn't that be something? If the world is in the state it is in today because the teachings we've been following were not wholly-holy that of Jesus and his words alone?

Blasphemic Drivel

 

[Wgw]

I think the story could lead on Art Bell however.

Since I began the whole Art Bell meme I should collect a royalty from you each time you reference it. By the way, the current hosts of that show, well, the last time I listened to it a few years ago, included a rather credulous chap known as George Noory, and a clergyman who I think was Anglican, who was a bit less credulous. At least Art Bell tended to be a bit sceptical, whereas Noory comes across as almost buying into the unusual beliefs of enguests.

 

[Wgw]

Jesus in Matt 24:4-5, 24-27 warned about a false Christ coming in His name of Jesus. Our Lord told us we should not trust anyone who claims a wilderness experience because the true Jesus would be seen by every eye on earth when He returns. This video in detail.

A friend who patronizes a Bible study forum sent me these video linked together. An interesting premise as far as controversial theology goes in Christian doctrine.
Paul wrote about 2/3rds of the new testament in the form of his letters. While the disciples that walked with Christ have but few in comparison.

Wouldn't that be something? If the world is in the state it is in today because the teachings we've been following were not wholly-holy that of Jesus and his words alone?

Since the Pauline epistles predate the rest of the NT, and since the account of the Last Supper for example, in the Synoptics, matches 1 Corinthians, I tend to reject such views.

 

[Jordan Kurecki]

Peter in one of his epistles places a stamp of approval on the writings of Paul.

 

[Soyeong]

Jesus in Matt 24:4-5, 24-27 warned about a false Christ coming in His name of Jesus. Our Lord told us we should not trust anyone who claims a wilderness experience because the true Jesus would be seen by every eye on earth when He returns. This video in detail.

A friend who patronizes a Bible study forum sent me these video linked together. An interesting premise as far as controversial theology goes in Christian doctrine.
Paul wrote about 2/3rds of the new testament in the form of his letters. While the disciples that walked with Christ have but few in comparison.

Wouldn't that be something? If the world is in the state it is in today because the teachings we've been following were not wholly-holy that of Jesus and his words alone?

Deuteronomy 13 warns that even if someone performs signs and wonders, the way to tell that they are a false prophet is was if the taught against obeying God's commands. So if Paul or the Christ that he met taught against following God's law, then they are false, but joyfully neither taught that. Paul also checked to make sure that what he was teaching was correct. If it had been a false Christ, then he wouldn't have checked out.

 

[Jahrooshshalom]

Since the Pauline epistles predate the rest of the NT, and since the account of the Last Supper for example, in the Synoptics, matches 1 Corinthians, I tend to reject such views.

"Apostle" was a term reserved for those who walked with Jesus.
Paul never did that. He never knew Jesus, never heard him preach. Isn't it odd that a man who never knew Christ has his letters in the new testament and they predate those attributed to the actual Apostles that walked with Jesus?

 

[Neochristian]

"Apostle" was a term reserved for those who walked with Jesus.
Paul never did that. He never knew Jesus, never heard him preach. Isn't it odd that a man who never knew Christ has his letters in the new testament and they predate those attributed to the actual Apostles that walked with Jesus?

I heard Enoch walked with the Lord.

 

[Jahrooshshalom]

Or if pigs could fly! Don't forget that.

Please, if you can't add something constructive don't add sarcasm in its stead. Thank you.

I heard Enoch walked with the Lord.

Yes, we're told that in Genesis. And yet also we're told in Exodus that no man can look upon God and live. I'd think then that Enoch walked figuratively with God and it was then that God took him up.

 

[Neochristian]

Please, if you can't add something constructive don't add sarcasm in its stead. Thank you.

Yes, we're told that in Genesis. And yet also we're told in Exodus that no man can look upon God and live. I'd think then that Enoch walked figuratively with God and it was then that God took him up.

Yes, that is a great mystery. Outside Sodom and Gomorrah Abraham walked with the Lord and kept His way by doing righteousness and justice. Moses too met with the Lord, but never looked at Him, if memory serves. Could Enoch have done the same?

 

[Jahrooshshalom]

Yes, that is a great mystery. Outside Sodom and Gomorrah Abraham walked with the Lord and kept His way by doing righteousness and justice. Moses too met with the Lord, but never looked at Him, if memory serves. Could Enoch have done the same?

Not if he wanted to live, per Exodus.
Walking with God in scriptures even in the old testament pertains to the Christians in faith in the new. It's a lifestyle, a way of life, that allows us to walk with God in his word. Not literally.
I think that was how it was in the old testament as well. Noah walked with God. Scriptures in 2 Kings 8 talks of Ahaziah who walked in the ways of the house of Ahab. So it isn't a literal 'walk' that is described in such passages then or in those that pertain to someone who walks with God. It can't be if looking on God causes death. If someone is walking with God they stand to look at him, unless they're walking with God in following his ways, his teachings, and then they're walking in the faith that abides.

 

[Wgw]

Not if he wanted to live, per Exodus.
Walking with God in scriptures even in the old testament pertains to the Christians in faith in the new. It's a lifestyle, a way of life, that allows us to walk with God in his word. Not literally.
I think that was how it was in the old testament as well. Noah walked with God. Scriptures in 2 Kings 8 talks of Ahaziah who walked in the ways of the house of Ahab. So it isn't a literal 'walk' that is described in such passages then or in those that pertain to someone who walks with God. It can't be if looking on God causes death. If someone is walking with God they stand to look at him, unless they're walking with God in following his ways, his teachings, and then they're walking in the faith that abides.

This approach seems to deny the reality of the Incarnation. It would seem that not only do you want us to reject St. Paul, but also St. John.

 

[Soyeong]

"Apostle" was a term reserved for those who walked with Jesus.
Paul never did that. He never knew Jesus, never heard him preach. Isn't it odd that a man who never knew Christ has his letters in the new testament and they predate those attributed to the actual Apostles that walked with Jesus?

"Apostle" is a title for anyone who is a sent one or messenger.

 

[Jahrooshshalom]

"Apostle" is a title for anyone who is a sent one or messenger.

Yes, apostle meant, one sent on a mission. John 17 speaks of Jesus and his choosing his Disciples to be the anointed , remembering his anointing of their feet prior to his crucifixion, to deliver the gospel to the world.