David Daleiden Doubles Down

[Hank77]

They had fake ID's specifically in order to get the undercover video. Hardly on the same level as put forth by the DA.

I agree. I think the charges were excessive but I don't know TX laws. Maybe there wasn't any other law that they could charge them under.

 

[KCfromNC]

• In the third video: Holly O’Donnell, a former Stem Express employee who worked inside a Planned Parenthood clinic, detailed first-hand the unspeakable atrocities and how she fainted in horror over handling baby legs.

http://graphics.latimes.com/planned-parenthood-videos/

Unreleased footage filed in a civil court case shows that O’Donnell’s apparently spontaneous reflections were carefully rehearsed. David Daleiden, the anti-abortion activist who made the videos, is heard coaching O’Donnell through repeated takes

The videos and court records show that Daleiden and his associates — posing as representatives of a fetal tissue brokerage — tried to loosen the tongues of abortion providers with alcohol.

In conversations, they tried to plant phrases such as “fully intact baby” and to elicit statements suggesting that fetuses were alive when their tissue and organs were harvested for use in medical research.

A comparison of raw footage and the videos he released shows that Daleiden edited out material that conflicted with his premise that Planned Parenthood-affiliated clinics profit from the sale of fetal tissue for research purposes.

On Feb. 5, U.S. District Judge William Orrick in San Francisco issued an injunction requested by the NAF to keep more than 500 hours of Daleiden’s unreleased footage under seal.

Orrick said the videos Daleiden has made public so far “have not been pieces of journalistic integrity, but misleadingly edited videos and unfounded assertions… of criminal misconduct.”

Daleiden’s “fraud” was so extensive and his videos so misleading that his still-unpublished recordings of private conversations do not warrant 1st Amendment protection as free speech, the judge said. In his order, Orrick used the words “fraud” or “fraudulently” 13 times in referring to Daleiden’s methods.

Guess US District Courts are in on the conspiracy to defend PP... Seems like all of reality is, in fact. Wonder why.

 

[PapaZoom]

I called it in the beginning. It was a political hit job and it had nowhere to go.

 

[imind]

I called it in the beginning. It was a political hit job and it had nowhere to go.

lol, not exactly. the charges were dismissed on a technicality, one that does not address their guilt. charges still pending in CA...

 

[PapaZoom]

lol, not exactly. the charges were dismissed on a technicality, one that does not address their guilt. charges still pending in CA...

The technicality having to do with the fact that the DA violated the code of ethics for one. And he'd never have been found guilty at any rate. And the California charge is also politically motivated and will not stand. And then when I announce that fact, you can offer another excuse to support Planned Parenthood.

 

[PapaZoom]

So this is interesting. Under Texas law, when a grand jury convenes, there is a time limit to present the facts of the case. It's true that the case against Daleiden was dropped as a technicality. Why? The grand jury ran out of time! They couldn't' come to any conclusion that Daleiden other the others had violated that they had violated the law. Texas law gives grand juries only so much time to do their investigation. Even with the time given them, they could NOT come to the conclusion that he had broken the law. If the evidence was so strong against Daleiden, there would have been no problem. But the law was on Daleiden's side and against the DA and her political ambitions. This is as good as a not guilty announcement.

 

[PapaZoom]

Now on to California and the illegal seizure of Daleiden's property and overreach by the liberal government there. It may have to go past the liberal California courts but after that, Daleiden will be again vindicated.

 

[imind]

So this is interesting. Under Texas law, when a grand jury convenes, there is a time limit to present the facts of the case. It's true that the case against Daleiden was dropped as a technicality. Why? The grand jury ran out of time! They couldn't' come to any conclusion that Daleiden other the others had violated that they had violated the law. Texas law gives grand juries only so much time to do their investigation. Even with the time given them, they could NOT come to the conclusion that he had broken the law. If the evidence was so strong against Daleiden, there would have been no problem. But the law was on Daleiden's side and against the DA and her political ambitions. This is as good as a not guilty announcement.

no, the grand jury was limited in what it could investigate. they didn't have jurisdiction. again, the dismissal had nothing to do with with guilt/innocence.

 

[PapaZoom]

no, the grand jury was limited in what it could investigate. they didn't have jurisdiction. again, the dismissal had nothing to do with with guilt/innocence.

Check your facts. They couldn't come to a conclusion on the matter and they ran out of time and had to drop the case. If you can't come to a conclusion on a case, the evidence is weak.

 

[lasthero]

This is as good as a not guilty announcement.

In your mind, perhaps.

 

[Uncle Siggy]

Lets see Daleiden was indicted and cleared but he's still guilty and Hillary was never indicted but should have been and she's as pure as the driven snow, go figure...

 

[KCfromNC]

lol, not exactly. the charges were dismissed on a technicality, one that does not address their guilt. charges still pending in CA...

And there are various civil cases still to worry about. Given the quotes I posted from the judge involved in one of them, it doesn't look positive for Davey. All those uses of the word fraud tend to hint what the outcome might be.