- Thermodynamics vs. Evolutionism -
The article is long. Much longer than is should be, the question is:
"Does Evolution violate the laws of Thermodynamics?"
The answer is: Since earth is an open system the Second Law of Thermodynamics is not applicable in proving or disproving the Theory of Evolution.
This isn't debatable, the law ceases to be a law in an open system.
Where the article went wrong(Obvious lies):
This statement is saying is that the entropy of a closed system or an open system cannot decrease. Which turns a very consistant observation(Second Law) into an entirely null hypothesis.
The article is long. Much longer than is should be, the question is:
"Does Evolution violate the laws of Thermodynamics?"
The answer is: Since earth is an open system the Second Law of Thermodynamics is not applicable in proving or disproving the Theory of Evolution.
This isn't debatable, the law ceases to be a law in an open system.
Where the article went wrong(Obvious lies):
Here's the moment in time where the author went wrong. He changes from the Second Law to a null hypothesis and rambles on for paragraphs about said null hypothesis.Ordinarily the second law is stated for isolated [closed] systems, but the second law applies equally well to open systems
This statement is saying is that the entropy of a closed system or an open system cannot decrease. Which turns a very consistant observation(Second Law) into an entirely null hypothesis.
No it doesn't. It only fails in the face of a bait and switch argument where the writer went from the Second Law to a null hypothesis.In short, the “open system” argument fails to adequately justify evolutionist speculation in the face of the second law.
The quotes were about the Second Law not the null hypothesis.Most highly respected evolutionist scientists (some of whom have been quoted above with care—and within context) acknowledge this fact, many even acknowledging the problem it causes the theory to which they subscribe.