Yeah, that's what I was trying to say is a God had to create the first thing living or non living energy or anything doesn't come from absolutely nowhere the only assumption you must really make is God is self-existent. ... Think about the way things are you're clearly here for a reason if you ask me this all couldn't have happened by chance.
There is a difference between the Christian belief and "a God
had to create", thus saying there is absolutely no other way to get a universe than to have God create it. There are other entities hypothesized to be creator of the universe. NONE of them are "chance". I understand when you say "if you ask me" and you are giving your personal opinion. That's fine. The problem comes when you tell people "a God had to create".
There's some reason you're on this forum. Regardless of what you think of all of the previous here's a fact, many prophecies in the Bible have come true. That can't be a
coincidence and there's no denying that.
Now you are making apologetics argument. What Christians can say, and many do -- including me -- is that no, that the "prophecies" came true is not a coincidence. But the reason is that the "prophecies" were written AFTER the event.
Proverbs 3:5-6
New International Version (NIV)
5 Trust in the LORD with all your heart
and lean not on your own understanding;
6 in all your ways submit to him,
and he will make your paths straight.
Part of this is about what we can legitimately say to non-Christians without saying things that are not true. Part of trusting in the Lord is trusting that God really is the Creator. Thus, what we learn from science we are ultimately learning from God.
John 3:16
New International Version (NIV)
16 For God so loved the world that he gave his one and only Son, that whoever believes in him shall not perish but have eternal life.
This is indeed a foundational
belief of Christianity. But I haven't argued against that, have I?
Juvenissum stated that all Christian denominations believe that Jesus is the
only way to get eternal life. That isn't what the verse states. It says belief in Jesus is
a way to have eternal life. There are Christian denominations -- and the UMC is one -- who do not believe that belief in Jesus is the
only way. After all, Moses, David, Ruth, etc. never believed in Jesus, did they? Should we deny that those people perished and did not have eternal life?
I will leave you with something St. Augustine wrote, way back in the 400s AD:
"Even a non-Christian knows something about the earth, the heavens, and the other elements of this world, about the motion and orbit of the stars and even their size and relative positions, about the predictable eclipses of the sun and moon, the cycles of the years and the seasons, about the kinds of animals, shrubs, stones, and so forth, and this knowledge he holds to be certain from reason and experience. Now it is a disgraceful and dangerous thing for an infidel to hear a Christian, presumably giving the meaning of Holy Scripture, talking nonsense on these topics; and we should take all means to prevent such an embarrassing situation, in which people show up vast ignorance in a Christian and laugh it to scorn. The shame is not so much that an ignorant individual is derided, but that people outside the household of faith think our sacred writers held such opinions, and, to the great loss of those for whose salvation we toil, the writers of our Scripture are criticized and rejected as unlearned men. If they find a Christian mistaken in a field which they themselves know well and hear him maintaining his foolish opinions about our books, how are they going to believe those books in matters concerning the resurrection of the dead, the hope of eternal life, and the kingdom of heaven, when they think their pages are full of falsehoods and on facts which they themselves have learnt from experience and the light of reason? Reckless and incompetent expounders of Holy Scripture bring untold trouble and sorrow on their wiser brethren when they are caught in one of their mischievous false opinions and are taken to task by those who are not bound by the authority of our sacred books. For then, to defend their utterly foolish and obviously untrue statements, they will try to call upon Holy Scripture for proof and even recite from memory many passages which they think support their position, although they understand neither what they say nor the things about which they make assertion. [1 Timothy 1.7]"
" Augustine, On the Literal Meaning of Genesis, Book 1, Chapter 19.
1 Timothy 1:7 "Desiring to be teachers of the law; understanding neither what they say, nor whereof they affirm. "