Common ancestor between chimps and humans

UCDavis

Active Member
Sep 24, 2015
107
23
Alameda, California
✟10,642.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Shalom everybody,
I was reading on Smithsonian institutes page on human origins and I saw this picture. If you look to the lower right it says " the last common ancestor of humans and chimps. We do not yet have its remains."
 

Attachments

  • Screen Shot 2015-09-25 at 8.26.28 AM.png
    Screen Shot 2015-09-25 at 8.26.28 AM.png
    40.6 KB · Views: 198

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,141
Visit site
✟98,005.00
Faith
Agnostic
Shalom everybody,
I was reading on Smithsonian institutes page on human origins and I saw this picture. If you look to the lower right it says " the last common ancestor of humans and chimps. We do not yet have its remains."

Correct. In addition, it would be impossible to say that any fossil is a direct ancestor of any living organism.

What we do have is mountains of genetic evidence demonstrating that chimps and humans share a common ancestor. With DNA, we can determine if two species have DNA that they inherited from a shared ancestor. As far as determining direct relatedness, DNA is a much better data set. Fossils are just icing on the cake.
 
Upvote 0

Loudmouth

Contributor
Aug 26, 2003
51,417
6,141
Visit site
✟98,005.00
Faith
Agnostic
Humans have 23 pairs pairs of chromosomes. Apes have 24! Are u saying we share a common ancestor with tobacco also, since the tobacco plant has 24 chromosomes also? Lol

Common ancestry isn't determined by number of chromosomes. It is determined by sequence comparison of shared DNA.
 
Upvote 0

UCDavis

Active Member
Sep 24, 2015
107
23
Alameda, California
✟10,642.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Correct. In addition, it would be impossible to say that any fossil is a direct ancestor of any living organism.

What we do have is mountains of genetic evidence demonstrating that chimps and humans share a common ancestor. With DNA, we can determine if two species have DNA that they inherited from a shared ancestor. As far as determining direct relatedness, DNA is a much better data set. Fossils are just icing on the cake.

Whats the name of the fossil for icing?
"We do not yet have its remains." -Smithsonian institute
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

AnotherAtheist

Gimmie dat ol' time physical evidence
Site Supporter
Aug 16, 2007
1,225
601
East Midlands
✟123,826.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
In Relationship
Whats the name of the fossil for icing?
"We do not yet have its remains." -Smithsonian institute

What do you think that quote from the Smithsonian means? And what is the consequence of that statement?
 
Upvote 0

JonFromMinnesota

Well-Known Member
Sep 3, 2015
2,171
1,608
Minnesota
✟52,766.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Upvote 0

JonFromMinnesota

Well-Known Member
Sep 3, 2015
2,171
1,608
Minnesota
✟52,766.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

JonFromMinnesota

Well-Known Member
Sep 3, 2015
2,171
1,608
Minnesota
✟52,766.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums