Croc said:Creationism can be used to describe "similarities and differences between organisms, fossils, biogeography, drug resistance, extreme features such as the peacock's tail, relative virulence of parasites, and much more besides" too. Also it does it alot better.
Harpuia said:Well... within reason, pal.
Though I wouldn't mind learnin' Alchemy... dunno why, always had some interest in it.
jamesrwright3 said:I am sure he can formulate a sentence just fine, he has two degrees from IVY League Institutions. Some people are simply not gifted speakers
BeamMeUpScotty said:As for ID, someone please show me one article in a reputable peer-reviewed journal.
jamesrwright3 said:I am sure he can formulate a sentence just fine, he has two degrees from IVY League Institutions. Some people are simply not gifted speakers
No life science makes sense without evolution.Croc said:It makes no sense for schools to keep teaching something that runs contrary to the religious beliefs of many of the students and at the same time serves no purpose in science. Absolutely nothing is based on the theory of evolution it is just standing out there all on its own affecting nothing and there is no reason to keep teaching it. Biology does not depends on it, physics do not depend on it, medicine does not depend on it, absolutely nothing depends on it.
Question: Is God falsifiable in creationism? If he is not, it is not science.Croc said:Oh yeh you're just not aware of what the alternative theories are. Creationism science has come along way and is making evolution look more and more foolish an idea every day. What is even more amazing is how the Bible's account is becoming more and more obviously proven through science. Since it is unlikely that someone, probably Moses, who wrote Genesis could have known so much back in those days the claim that God must have told him what to write gets more and more credible. Of course God knew that all of this would be proven out as well, and also knew that there will always be those with hard hearts unwilling to believe in him, no matter how much evidence he gave us and how many people he showed himself to who have testified.
Robert43 said:(AgapePress) - President Bush is being praised for stating that public school students should be exposed to different schools of thought on the subject of the origins of life.
Croc said:Oh yeh you're just not aware of what the alternative theories are. Creationism science has come along way and is making evolution look more and more foolish an idea every day. What is even more amazing is how the Bible's account is becoming more and more obviously proven through science. Since it is unlikely that someone, probably Moses, who wrote Genesis could have known so much back in those days the claim that God must have told him what to write gets more and more credible. Of course God knew that all of this would be proven out as well, and also knew that there will always be those with hard hearts unwilling to believe in him, no matter how much evidence he gave us and how many people he showed himself to who have testified.
Croc said:Since Moses dies right at the end of Deuteronomy it is highly probably that he wrote it right before his death himself. There's a few things there which a prophet my know like that the people would not have such a great prophet such as himself again, and that they would weep for him. There are only a few verses which are placed after his death. Since Moses was a prophet God could have told him such things. The Bible states how Moses finished writing down the law shortly before his death.
It wouldn't be that hard for Moses who was writing down the first 5 books near the end to write down, " and Moses finished writing the law" since he knew he was all done, would it? So there is no problem there at all.
Croc said:Im not sure what your other question means.