There may be individuals who do, but there are some in every denomination that don't follow the official church policy.
There are more than just "some". It's quite a controversy in that denomination.
You haven't given them to me because I have not discussed this issue with you in any other thread.
I knew you'd ignore them. That's precisely why I'm not all that enthusiastic about giving them to you again.
Let's see, I am supporting my UMC monetarily, I pray for the church and members of the congregation in need of extra prayers (I'm on the email prayer chain so I can keep up with prayer concerns). So I am not physically there more than once or twice a year when we go to visit family. Are you saying that is a sin?
I'm saying that you're not meeting the Biblical obligation to that church and that you may be on the rolls, but you're not a member in any practical sense.
However the church I am at physically I am unable to become a member of due to some doctrinal differences that are insurrmountable at this time. But I am active in this church, giving of my time, my talents and my money. I am a member in every way, but documentation. And that is all due more to a people thing than a God thing.
I see. So, if you were to be disciplined by that church, how can they discipline you if you're not a member?
So, what would you have me do? Have absolutely no ties to my former church?
If the doctrinal differences you have with the church you're currently visiting are that serious, then why are you there? If they're not, then why don't you join?
I'm starting to get the feeling from your posts that it's not a matter of doctrinal differences, but that you don't want to submit to them.
Go against some very basic and long held beliefs to join a congregation on paper?
You claim that you're a member in every sense but "on paper" as it is. What would be the difference?
Leave the church I currently attend and leave my family on Sunday mornings to find a different church?
If their doctrine is false, as you're claiming, then, yes.
Are you such a legalist that you can not understand that the important thing is not what name over the door you put down on a form, but the condition of your heart?
And are you such a rebel that you cannot understand the importance of following Biblical teaching?
Funny how when the argument breaks down, the fallback position is always to call your opponnent a legalist. I'm betting "pharisee" or "heresy hunter" is coming next.
Official membership to a particular congregation means little in the grand scheme of things.
If this were true, then the Bible wouldn't make such a big deal out of it.