Yes, the evidence provided by God.So let me get this straight:
An evolutionist looks at the Grand Canyon and says, "Yup. Look at that. It took millions of years to form. See the evidence?"
Upvote
0
Yes, the evidence provided by God.So let me get this straight:
An evolutionist looks at the Grand Canyon and says, "Yup. Look at that. It took millions of years to form. See the evidence?"
What is circular about a measurement?And how do we know the earth is [however] old?
The earth says so.
And that's not circular reasoning as well?
Well, you did use all those things as "evidence". And as I said, they are certainly evidence for a belief in the Christian god, but they are not evidence for that god. See the difference? Or do you also think that the Quran, muezzins reciting adhan, mosques and minarets, dervish dancing, and time divided in BH and AH are evidence for the Muslim god?I didn't say that, chief.
I used "Merry Christmas" as one of thousands of pieces of evidence for the existence of God.
I could have easily used BC/AD, Christian churches, Christian iconography, etc.
So let me get this straight:
An evolutionist looks at the Grand Canyon and says, "Yup. Look at that. It took millions of years to form. See the evidence?"
But someone says, "Merry Christmas," and that's only evidence that he believes in God?
Pretty much, yes. Or as the persons I know with a forename of Christian are all atheists.I suppose Christmas is no more Christian to you guys 'around here,' than Christopher Walken is Jesus Christ, is it?
Well, you did use all those things as "evidence". And as I said, they are certainly evidence for a belief in the Christian god, but they are not evidence for that god. See the difference? Or do you also think that the Quran, muezzins reciting adhan, mosques and minarets, dervish dancing, and time divided in BH and AH are evidence for the Muslim god?
So, you are saying that the god of Abraham and Allah both exists, but one is more powerful than the other?Yeah Allah may be a god but the God of Abraham doesn't condone , teach or approve "Al Taqiyya" , that nullifies any association from the git-go to the Creator ....
So, you are saying that the god of Abraham and Allah both exists, but one is more powerful than the other?
Deleted.Apparently I know and you have no clue ...
Absolutely true. I'm sorry for the derail. Please move on.And none of this dialogue has anything to do with the fact that human remains are never found with dinosaur remains and any 'remains' that are found together are insurmountably fakes.
Absolutely true. I'm sorry for the derail. Please move on.
More Dunning-Kruger I see. That really saddens me as a Christian and scientist. As for the human footprints along side dinosaur prints, did you not read my post where I quoted AiG and included a link to that quote where they state that those are not human footprints?But an Atheist can't look at Mt St Helens and see very close similarities or admit new formed volcanic rock dates by their own methods out to as much as 2,000,000 million years old ? It's called never being able to come to the truth , just like the human footprints along side the dino prints .. Both comical and sad at the same time to watch them scramble ....
Wrong , if human footprints are along side dino footprints then they both lived and died together .. Right Watson ?
More Dunning-Kruger I see. That really saddens me as a Christian and scientist. As for the human footprints along side dinosaur prints, did you not read my post where I quoted AiG and included a link to that quote where they state that those are not human footprints?
Except that we have never found human footprints with dinosaurs prints and the ones that have supposedly been found are undeniably fake!
Yes ... I'm familiar with the wordplay.Well, you did use all those things as "evidence". And as I said, they are certainly evidence for a belief in the Christian god, but they are not evidence for that god.
Quite clearly.Herman Hedning said:See the difference?
Today's science is hypocritical.But an Atheist can't look at Mt St Helens and see very close similarities or admit new formed volcanic rock dates by their own methods out to as much as 2,000,000 million years old ? It's called never being able to come to the truth , just like the human footprints along side the dino prints .. Both comical and sad at the same time to watch them scramble ....
We ? ... I'm not confined to an agenda .