Spot onI think he means the the reasons for the orders being invalid depends who you ask, not the fact of invalidity itself. If I recall correctly, Pope Leo and Pope Benedict XVI used completely different, and perhaps somewhat contradictory reasoning, to come to that same conclusion.
Don't ask me to elaborate. It's been too long since I rrad abut it. Maybe ebia can clarify.
I believe Henry was once a strong catholic man but after being refused an annulment by the pope he decided to split there where of course other issues involved but I believe the annulment was the main issue that split the Church of England from Rome
Interestingly, James Akin, eminent Catholic apologist discusses in a blog post the fact that the invalidity of Anglican and Lutheran "eucharists" do not necessarily mean the refusal of God's grace being given in some way – even up to a real encounter, of some kind, with Christ. Deus bonum est!
It brings them closer to the truth. Rejoice!But surly u see where I'm coming from Our savior sent his mother to give us the Catholic Church the rosary not Anglicans to rosary was given to the Catholic Church they basically just stole it
Indeed - the denial of the annulment set things in motion.I believe Henry was once a strong catholic man but after being refused an annulment by the pope he decided to split there where of course other issues involved but I believe the annulment was the main issue that split the Church of England from Rome
Henry's sickly son Edward continued and expanded the Protantization of the CofE, whereas Henry kept it mostly Catholic, minus the Pope. Then the CofE became Catholic again under Henry's daughter Mary I (aka Bloody Mary). Then finally went back to being Protestant under Mary's half sister (Henry and Anne's daughter) Elizabeth I. So the final break occurred 3 monarchs after Henry. (Or 4 monarchs, if you count Lady Jane Grey as a legitimate Queen).How do you tell the Pope to stay out?
And then say the Pope did it?
Henry Protestanized it via martyring the Saints - who refused to adjudicate against the Pope?
Also Henry married Anne - who helped Protestantize the Church of England.
The truth is all over the place about the historical occurrence of Henry removing that diocese from the Church of Rome.
Initially it was illicit - then it became invalid when Protestant teachings entered the fold.Henry's sickly son Edward continued and expanded the Protantization of the CofE, whereas Henry kept it mostly Catholic, minus the Pope. Then the CofE became Catholic again under Henry's daughter Mary I (aka Bloody Mary). Then finally went back to being Protestant under Mary's half sister (Henry and Anne's daughter) Elizabeth I. So the final break occurred 3 monarchs after Henry. (Or 4 monarchs, if you count Lady Jane Grey as a legitimate Queen).
Or it could be that the TV drama really is historically accurate. Y'know, that's one possibility.When someone thinks a TV drama is historically accurate that tends to indicate they have an innacurate view of history
It could be - though I know there are at least some historical inaccuracies. But I'd say the default position is that they aren't.Or it could be that the TV drama really is historically accurate. Y'know, that's one possibility.
Let's be fair. Elizabeth's long reign extirpated the Latin Catholic nature of the CoE. Anlgo-Catholicism is really a 19th century reintroduction in large part.
No, they did not "steal" our stuff. The Anglican Church is a "daughter" of the Catholic Church, so it is no coincidence that many of their beliefs and practices are very similar to ours.so I was recently talking to a Anglican friend and I realized they too have a mass structure similar to ours and some pray the rosary I started thinking do they even have a right to these things as there not in union with Rome some even believe in the transubstantiation of the eucruist as we do but they can have a valid eucruist can they ? Since there not united with us y should they get our stuff I know the history of the Anglican Church but if there not with us are they against us ?