Lizzy,
No, I did not say that at all..............
I said when Dan spoke about it, Antiochus was still future to himself, but past tense when Jesus spoke Mat 24:15. There is no contest, that there was an AOD in the 2nd Century BC. It is documented history.
So seeing there was already and AOD in the past for the Apostle's ears, they are not told to look at that one but the one DAN 12 says happens in the last 1260 + 30 days at the end of the age, and not in AD 70.
It is called the law of "double" referrence. Where more than one theme is repeated in history. :Type, and anti-type. And prophecy is simply "history" spoken in advance.
if you don't understand my point, then we must let this go and disagree............period.
Bro Frankie
Jesus was saying the words of Matthew 24 in roughly 27AD, speaking of an abomination of desolation as spoken of in Daniel and said WHEN YOU SEE it come to pass, then..." and YOU still sit there and insist Jesus was referring to Epiphanes which was nearly 200 years BEFORE Christ!
No, I did not say that at all..............
I said when Dan spoke about it, Antiochus was still future to himself, but past tense when Jesus spoke Mat 24:15. There is no contest, that there was an AOD in the 2nd Century BC. It is documented history.
So seeing there was already and AOD in the past for the Apostle's ears, they are not told to look at that one but the one DAN 12 says happens in the last 1260 + 30 days at the end of the age, and not in AD 70.
It is called the law of "double" referrence. Where more than one theme is repeated in history. :Type, and anti-type. And prophecy is simply "history" spoken in advance.
if you don't understand my point, then we must let this go and disagree............period.
Bro Frankie
Upvote
0