Your making good points there. Unlike old earth, and the ToE, the people trying to prove a complete historical/literal genesis, are not using scientific experiments/evidence to prove their case.
Though i think the reason for that, is because it can be argued that "creation science" isn't actual science, for it does not follow the laws that actual science has to follow to be science.
Also remember, that believers in YEC (generally speaking, im sure there are some YEC'ers who actually try to find "scientific evidence" to also prove their beliefs beyond simply accepting YEC because they think that's what the bible says) don't care about scientific evidence, to them, their interpretation of the bible trumps any form/importance of using/existing scientific evidence. They already believe the earth is around 6,000 years old, evolution false, Man began with 2 modern homosapiens, Global flood, etc, and unlike ToE and old earth, these concepts do not rely on scientific evidence to be considered true from a human perspective.
You hit the nail on the head there. Creation science is definitely not science. Nonetheless if Genesis is true history, then there should be evidence for it. It would be like a map pointing to a treasure chest. The evidence will be the chest.
Young earthers who disregard having evidence for what they believe are walking blindly, and it's plain wrong to try convince someone of something if they don't have valid reasons themselves. Of course they don't realize they open up the door for anyone to believe in anything.
What kind of experiment would prove a miracle like creation to you? Do you not realize that miracles are not repeating events?
BTW, do you need experimental evidence for the Resurrection as well? Can you explain what experiment helped you to believe in the Resurrection?
If Genesis is true history, it would leave behind evidence. For instance if the flood happened, that effected the whole world. We should be able to make hypothesis about the flood, and test those things out. Take for instance Walt Brown's "Hydroplate Theory" or it should be called "Hydroplate Hypothesis". I believe he was definitely on the right track, but I disagree on some of the things he state. (And I don't know where he got his numbers from, but I'm no expert concerning that) According to this hypothesis, the asteroids and comets we see out there has origins from this earth. We should be able to test that out. (Of course keeping in mind that these objects may have a somewhat different composition than what's found on earth today, due to a different atmosphere before the flood. All this stuff is worth looking into)
I myself have two thoughts of testing out the truthfulness of Genesis. One for testing the effects the flood would have on rock, and another for testing plant growth pre-flood. So these things can definitely be tested out because we are testing the history of Genesis, not the actual act of the creation of the world.
In the same way, evidence for our belief that Jesus rose from the dead is partly from circumstances and accounts from people who knew Jesus. From the likelihood that if Jesus is what is said of Him, that this belief could have survived. There were many people in that time that had things said about them, what made Jesus' claims so special that it spread as it did before people were forced to become christian that is. Even if the sayings about Jesus spread by chance (because that can happen, in fact, it happened a lot for different reasons), I argue there was so much going against it, that in and of itself it most definitely should have not spread past Jerusalem. (The Jewish leadership was against it, and there was no real appeal for foreigners to receive it considering people were dying for their affiliation)
Yet besides all that, the number one evidence for the resurrection, is the affects the Holy Spirit has had on our lives. This isn't just some positive change that we see in chrisitan lives, because anyone can make a positive change. I'm talking our lives being radically different than anything seen on the earth. That we are almost considered aliens when people look at us. For instance, the apostles did many miracles by the power of the Holy Spirit, just like Jesus did. If they did miracles by the same power Jesus did, then logically Jesus did miracles as well. If all that is true, then it's most likely the sayings of Jesus are true, and Jesus truly rose again. Today, you don't see many, if any, miracles. That is the number one evidence for Jesus resurrection. (The miracles are repeatable, because they happen throughout a believers life on this earth.)