ID is 'alive' as a social/religious apologetics movement (and a grift), not as a scientific idea.
Even in those circles, ID is barely hanging on. Google search analytics show search interest in the term 'intelligent design' peaked in November 2005. Searches for intelligent design are now just 1% of what they were then, despite the fact that global internet use has increased fivefold since then. Most of the websites, blogs and news mills dedicated to ID have died out. You might even say there was a natural selective process going on.
ID proponents aren't publishing scientific papers (well not anywhere other than in in-house journals and vanity press) and they're certainly not publishing peer reviewed papers. The Discovery Institute shut down its "research" division (the Biologic Institute) in 2021, although it was basically moribund from about 2017 onwards.
The Discovery Institute's house journal BIO-Complexity has a grand total of
two research articles in it this year. One of which (hilariously) debunks itself in it's own results section.
The Discovery Institute is essentially reduced to publishing retreads of the same books it published 20-25 years ago, and angry news and blog posts from the same 30-40 culture warriors. The types who think the NWO is real, that Social Darwinism/racism is related to evolutionary biology (it's not, any more than phrenology is related to anatomy), that green policies are a conspiracy to redistribute wealth and that things would be better if the US was a theocracy.
If you look at the anti-ID website (like the Panda's Thumb or Sensuous Curmudgeon), they've not hand any real leg work to do in the last 12 months. I think the last thing they did of any note was 'A Mousetrap for Darwin' in 2020, which was Behe's attempt to come to terms with his PTSD from the
Kitzmiller v Dover decision, and a lively debate with a Swedish statistician who published a paper claiming 'non physical information' is a thing in gentic inheritance, got some of the basics wrong when dealing with protien structures and admits to using a model that "assumes that all humans are descended from a first couple, Adam and Eve".