When you indicate the word "special" what you are really meaning is "better than".
I think some people apply that particular interpretation, but I think the context here is different. I don't believe you're suggesting the Jews are "special" in that they are better, but you are definitely suggesting that they are different.
If you want to attack the idea that Jews are saved by virtue of being Jews - then sure do that battle - but not here.
It's interesting that you see it as "attacking" for me to challenge the idea that Jews are saved by virtue of being Jews. Why should you see it as an attack for me to say that such a notion is inconsistent with what Jesus taught?
This forum is about eschatology, not about salvation as salvation is a given for everyone participating here.
Actually, I didn't make this is an issue about the Jews. The pre-tribbers did. Remember all that stuff you keep saying about how the Jews make an appearance all throughout the Bible? Both you and straightshot have claimed that prophecy from Matthew 24 and the Great Tribulation are for the Jews. I am responding to those arguments with rebuttals about how the Jews are neither special, better, nor different from Christians regarding the spiritual lessons behind Jesus' teachings, including prophecies about his return. But, when I make those arguments, you claim that I'm preaching at you, that I'm attempting to frustrate God's plans regarding the Jews, that I'm off topic etc; just about anything except a response to the evidence I've listed.
They are a chosen people, that God's power can be exhibited for the rest of the world to believe in Him - but that does not equate to any Jew being saved on the premise of being a Jew. Christians are the called and chosen unto salvation.
When you say they are "chosen people" what does that mean? You go on to say that Christians are the "called and chosen". How is the Jew's "chosen" different from the Christian's "chosen"? If you make the argument that we will not be around for the Great Tribulation, and that end time prophecy from Jesus was for the Jews, then it's actually quite important to get it clear why you see a difference and what criteria you're using to support that difference.
Israel and Jews are all through end time prophecy passages, in a major way.
This is why the physical vs the spiritual is so important. You're reasoning from a physical point of view, where any mention of "Israel" must, of necessity, mean flesh and blood Jews and only flesh and blood Jews. When the pharisees tried to win an argument against Jesus by claiming righteousness based on their physical lineage to Abraham, Jesus rebuked them by acknowledging their physical lineage but then concluding that the real children of Abraham are those people with the faith of Abraham. He even went so far as to call them, the "Lord's chosen" the children of the Devil.
This in itself should be enough evidence to make any sincere person pause and consider whether their understanding of a flesh-and-blood Jewish Israel really is in tune with what Jesus promoted. But, for someone who's doctrine hinges on the physical, they've got a strong motivation not to look past the surface, especially when that doctrine results in avoiding uncomfortable truths (like the suffering for our faith which the Great Tribulation represents for any follower).
Upvote
0