Dash cam video exonerates NJ man

whatbogsends

Senior Veteran
Aug 29, 2003
10,370
8,314
Visit site
✟281,429.00
Faith
Atheist
"A stunning police dashboard camera video helped exonerate an innocent New Jersey man — and led to the indictments of two Bloomfield cops who wrongly accused the man and allegedly beat him during the 2012 incident.

Before prosecutors were given a dashcam video from a second patrol car, Marcus Jeter faced charges of eluding police, resisting arrest and aggravated assault on an officer.
...
Dashcam video shows that tension at the stop quickly escalated. Two officers jump out of the patrol car and order Jeter out of the car at gunpoint. One is holding a pistol at the man while a second holds a shotgun at his side.

A second tape, of a backup officer responding from the other side of the highway, shows the patrol car swerve across oncoming traffic and running into the front of Jeter’s SUV, causing him to hit his head on the steering wheel.

Neither that video nor the fact the officer struck Jeter’s SUV with his patrol car was ever mentioned in any police report of the incident.
...
Jeter says he was scared he’d be shot if he exited the car. Instead, he says — and the video supports this claim — he sat where he was with his hands in the air as the officers broke the window, unlocked his door and worked to get his seatbelt off to arrest him.

“The next thing I know, as he’s coming around the car, the glass gets busted and all the glass goes in my face,” Jeter told WABC. “My hands are up. As soon as he opens the door, one of the officers just reached in and punched me in the face. As he’s trying to take my seatbelt off, he’s elbowing me in my jaw. And I’m like ‘Ahhh!’ and he’s like ‘Stop trying to take my gun! Stop resisting arrest!’”
...
“Stop resisting! Stop trying to take my f------ gun! Just put your hands behind your back, a--hole,” one officer yells.

“I’ve done nothing wrong,” a muffled Jeter can be heard saying as his face is smashed into the cement.
...
An internal investigation into the incident found the officers did nothing wrong. But they were suspended without pay in April 2013 and indicted on Jan 31.
...
The fact it took so long for the second video to come to light enraged Bloomfield’s Mayor Michael Venezia, who said on his Facebook page that he was “outraged” over “this police cover-up.”

“I am outraged by the police dashboard video and the fact that these charges were initially dismissed by our internal affairs division,” he wrote. "

http://www.nydailynews.com/news/cri...ates-nj-man-implicates-cops-article-1.1701763

The initial investigation by internal affairs exonerated the police, it wasn't until the 2nd video surfaced - 18 months after the initial incident - that the Marcus Jeter was able to prove the police charges against him were false. He was not only assaulted by police, but was facing 5 years in jail for the false charges brought against him.

The police which assaulted Jeter and pressed false charges against him were set to stand trial on July 13.

http://www.northjersey.com/news/cri...for-bloomfield-police-dash-cam-case-1.1285504

Despite the trial having supposed to be started on July 13, i can't find anything about the proceedings.
 

stamperben

It's an old family tradition
Oct 16, 2011
14,551
4,079
✟53,694.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private
Neither that video nor the fact the officer struck Jeter’s SUV with his patrol car was ever mentioned in any police report of the incident.

An internal investigation into the incident found the officers did nothing wrong.

The initial investigation by internal affairs exonerated the police, it wasn't until the 2nd video surfaced - 18 months after the initial incident - that the Marcus Jeter was able to prove the police charges against him were false. He was not only assaulted by police, but was facing 5 years in jail for the false charges brought against him.

Never mentioned...
Internal investigation...
Exonerated the police...

Then 18 months later the truth comes out. Shameful. And this happens more times than thought.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Cearbhall
Upvote 0

brinny

everlovin' shiner of light in dark places
Site Supporter
Mar 23, 2004
248,794
114,491
✟1,343,306.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Constitution
This is outrageous.....these officers were out and out criminals behind badges.....

i'm soooooo thankful Jeter survived and is not dead.

Whoever exonerated these officers needs to be held accountable and charged as accessories to these blatant and horrific crimes of these officers.

Sickening.
 
Upvote 0

cow451

Standing with Ukraine.
Site Supporter
May 29, 2012
41,108
24,128
Hot and Humid
✟1,120,276.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Is it aimed forward or back? Does it swivel?
The one I have has two lenses that each can be rotated 180 degrees. I have one pointed forward and one rear. Uses a micro SD and holds about two hours' video and audio. PM me if you want the brand.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

GoldenBoy89

We're Still Here
Sep 25, 2012
23,851
25,786
LA
✟555,821.00
Country
United States
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Democrat
Disgusting. To think of how often this could happen without video evidence to prove otherwise should be very concerning to any law abiding citizen.

Police literally believe they can do what they want without fear of repercussion. And that is because they can. Because we let them. Because you are un-American if you don't support anything and everything the police and military do, no matter what.
 
Upvote 0

stamperben

It's an old family tradition
Oct 16, 2011
14,551
4,079
✟53,694.00
Faith
Humanist
Marital Status
Private
Disgusting. To think of how often this could happen without video evidence to prove otherwise should be very concerning to any law abiding citizen.

Police literally believe they can do what they want without fear of repercussion. And that is because they can. Because we let them. Because you are un-American if you don't support anything and everything the police and military do, no matter what.
Remember Nixon's "Silent Majority?" They like the silence of the sheep, even today.
 
  • Like
Reactions: GoldenBoy89
Upvote 0

cow451

Standing with Ukraine.
Site Supporter
May 29, 2012
41,108
24,128
Hot and Humid
✟1,120,276.00
Country
United States
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
When are we gonna see your crash vids?
:eek:LOL, hopefully never. I got it after being rear-ended by a guy that tried to contest his culpability. I eventually won, but it would've been no contest had I had the dash cam then.
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,796
✟247,431.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
:eek:LOL, hopefully never. I got it after being rear-ended by a guy that tried to contest his culpability. I eventually won, but it would've been no contest had I had the dash cam then.

I thought whenever someone rear ends you, it is basically always their fault?
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Vylo

Stick with the King!
Aug 3, 2003
24,732
7,790
43
New Jersey
✟203,465.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Private
Politics
US-Others
I thought whenever someone rear ends you, it is basically always their fault?
Not always. If the person cut you off, it can be their fault. Once they are "in the flow of traffic", the person rear ending is at fault.

Exact rules vary by state.
 
Upvote 0

bhsmte

Newbie
Apr 26, 2013
52,761
11,796
✟247,431.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
Not always. If the person cut you off, it can be their fault. Once they are "in the flow of traffic", the person rear ending is at fault.

Exact rules vary by state.

Yes, I know there are exceptions. In the vast majority of cases though, it is the drivers responsibility behind you, to be able to stop in time, to avoid a collision.
 
Upvote 0

LittleLambofJesus

Hebrews 2:14.... Pesky Devil, git!
Site Supporter
May 19, 2015
125,492
28,588
73
GOD's country of Texas
Visit site
✟1,237,270.00
Country
United States
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Libertarian
Yes, I know there are exceptions.
In the vast majority of cases though, it is the drivers responsibility behind you, to be able to stop in time, to avoid a collision.
Yea. It can very difficult to prove your not at fault if you hit someone in the read end [not pun intended ehehe]. This is where witness/s can prove invaluable! As students were asked in a driver's ed class "was the accident avoidable"?

If I actually witness an accident, I will generally stop, first of all to see if anyone is hurt, and second of all to be a witness for the driver that was not at fault.

http://www.nolo.com/legal-encyclopedia/is-fault-automatic-rear-end-car-accident-case.html

Establishing Fault for Rear-End Accidents
The driver of the car that rear-ends a leading vehicle will almost always be considered at least partially negligent. Every driver has a duty to follow other vehicles at a safe distance.
The reason for this is because car drivers sometimes suddenly, and unexpectedly, slow down or come to a stop -- to avoid a hazard in the road, for example, or simply because of traffic congestion. You are expected to have enough distance between you and the car in front of you to prevent a collision if such an unanticipated stop becomes necessary.

However, it is possible for the driver of the car that gets rear-ended to be negligent as well. Consider the following scenarios:

  • a driver reverses suddenly
  • a driver stops suddenly to make a turn and fails to execute the turn
  • a driver’s brake lights do not function, and
  • a driver gets a flat tire, but does not pull over and does not engage the vehicle's hazard lights.
In each of these examples, the driver of the car that gets rear-ended would likely be considered negligent. The legal impact of that driver’s negligence will depend on how much that driver’s negligence contributed to the car accident, and how your state treats accident situations where more than one party is at fault.
 
Upvote 0

loveofourlord

Newbie
Feb 15, 2014
8,125
4,529
✟270,357.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Private
The one I have has two lenses that each can be rotated 180 degrees. I have one pointed forward and one rear. Uses a micro SD and holds about two hours' video and audio. PM me if you want the brand.

might be a idea to see if they sell a model that runs simular software of those new anti police phone aps, that if your recording cops doing something ilegal, it makes your phone appear off and uploads anything recorded online automaticly so that even destroying the phone or the SD card or confiscating it doesn't do jack, as it's already uploaded online.
 
  • Like
Reactions: cow451
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums