Imagican
old dude
- Jan 14, 2006
- 3,027
- 428
- 63
- Faith
- Christian Seeker
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
Oh dear . . . the American tele-evangelist, how embarrassing for we Pentecostals. But of course your argument is merely an attempt at guilt-by-association where I could just as easily foolishly make reference to the hard-core cessationist Westboro Baptists as reflecting all cessationists.
I am neither. Don't believe in or follow either.
Did I say ‘murderer’, I think not. Actually, how does someone “remain (or un-remain) a murderer” as it’s something that seems to be something that would be hard to undo, after all, once your murdered you tend to stay that way.
A murderer could certainly be saved. That would then make them an EX murderer. For we were ALL caught up in sin BEFORE re-birth. A new creature is no longer what the OLD WAS. My point was that the person that has NO desire to STOP being murderer REMAINS a murderer.
As for the drunkard, guess what, this happens every day of the week where those who are addicted to alcohol turn to the Lord; in many (or most) cases, as their bodies have been so damaged by alcohol they remain alcoholics for life where their bodies need to keep well away from the horrid stuff.
I am a firm believer in the power of God through Christ. ANYONE 'can' be healed. But there is NO HEALING if one remains in the SAME STATE.
As for the person who commits adultery, much the same occurs here as well as even a brief adulterous moment cannot be undone. Now if the Spirit filled Believer chooses to have even a brief one-night affair this does not mean that he/she will be unable to pray in the Spirit; where I suspect that the following morning might see the offender possibly spending a few anguished hours praying in tongues and if they were to fail to repent then I have little doubt that 1Cor 11:30-32 & Jms 5:14-16 might all of a sudden kick-in. Of course, if he/she is a ‘tele-evangelist’ where some of them tend to say, “Oops, I made a mistake and lets move on” then things could quickly become problematic.
Are you honestly saying that YOU believe that you're 'speaking in gibberish' or what you call an UNKNOWN tongue that even YOU don't understand is MORE effective that me PRAYING WITH UNDERSTANDING? That making noises that you don't understand yourself is of somehow MORE benefit than me praying in a language that I understand and that MAKES SENSE?
You know what, I’ve been hearing this old-wives tale for years where there has absolutely never been a single recorded incident where anyone has been able to speak in tongues while not in an extreme ecstatic state and even then I will question what people think that they might have heard. A lot of cessationists also try and pull the line that the early Greek oracles were supposed to speak in tongues as well but this has been debunked by those who specialise in this field.
No, it has been disputed by those that don't WANT to accept the evidence. With what we have available concerning history, an oracle often spoke incoherently requiring the NEED for an interpreter. And I have PERSONALLY never read a single word published by anyone attempting to refute this. For the only people that I can imagine that would have a REASON to try and dispute what history dictates in this matter would BE those that find it distasteful to have such behavior compared.
I do like how cessationists like to use the word "truth" a lot. Maybe you chaps think that if you say it enough that you might even believe what you say yourselves - it always amuses me.
Well, let me offer this: proclaiming to be faithful and following anything OTHER than the truth is either a LIE, or the indication is that they are faithful in something OTHER THAN the truth.
I believe that the Bible is capable of LEADING us to truth. Along with guidance through the Holy Spirit, we commanded to READ SCRIPTURE and compare each line to all others in order to FORM 'doctrine': (truth). We are to serve in TRUTH and Spirit.
Blessings,
MEC
Upvote
0