The Administration Of Tongues

Imagican

old dude
Jan 14, 2006
3,027
428
63
Orlando, Florida
✟45,021.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Oh dear . . . the American tele-evangelist, how embarrassing for we Pentecostals. But of course your argument is merely an attempt at guilt-by-association where I could just as easily foolishly make reference to the hard-core cessationist Westboro Baptists as reflecting all cessationists.

I am neither. Don't believe in or follow either.

Did I say ‘murderer’, I think not. Actually, how does someone “remain (or un-remain) a murderer” as it’s something that seems to be something that would be hard to undo, after all, once your murdered you tend to stay that way.

A murderer could certainly be saved. That would then make them an EX murderer. For we were ALL caught up in sin BEFORE re-birth. A new creature is no longer what the OLD WAS. My point was that the person that has NO desire to STOP being murderer REMAINS a murderer.

As for the drunkard, guess what, this happens every day of the week where those who are addicted to alcohol turn to the Lord; in many (or most) cases, as their bodies have been so damaged by alcohol they remain alcoholics for life where their bodies need to keep well away from the horrid stuff.

I am a firm believer in the power of God through Christ. ANYONE 'can' be healed. But there is NO HEALING if one remains in the SAME STATE.

As for the person who commits adultery, much the same occurs here as well as even a brief adulterous moment cannot be undone. Now if the Spirit filled Believer chooses to have even a brief one-night affair this does not mean that he/she will be unable to pray in the Spirit; where I suspect that the following morning might see the offender possibly spending a few anguished hours praying in tongues and if they were to fail to repent then I have little doubt that 1Cor 11:30-32 & Jms 5:14-16 might all of a sudden kick-in. Of course, if he/she is a ‘tele-evangelist’ where some of them tend to say, “Oops, I made a mistake and lets move on” then things could quickly become problematic.

Are you honestly saying that YOU believe that you're 'speaking in gibberish' or what you call an UNKNOWN tongue that even YOU don't understand is MORE effective that me PRAYING WITH UNDERSTANDING? That making noises that you don't understand yourself is of somehow MORE benefit than me praying in a language that I understand and that MAKES SENSE?

You know what, I’ve been hearing this old-wives tale for years where there has absolutely never been a single recorded incident where anyone has been able to speak in tongues while not in an extreme ecstatic state and even then I will question what people think that they might have heard. A lot of cessationists also try and pull the line that the early Greek oracles were supposed to speak in tongues as well but this has been debunked by those who specialise in this field.

No, it has been disputed by those that don't WANT to accept the evidence. With what we have available concerning history, an oracle often spoke incoherently requiring the NEED for an interpreter. And I have PERSONALLY never read a single word published by anyone attempting to refute this. For the only people that I can imagine that would have a REASON to try and dispute what history dictates in this matter would BE those that find it distasteful to have such behavior compared.

I do like how cessationists like to use the word "truth" a lot. Maybe you chaps think that if you say it enough that you might even believe what you say yourselves - it always amuses me.

Well, let me offer this: proclaiming to be faithful and following anything OTHER than the truth is either a LIE, or the indication is that they are faithful in something OTHER THAN the truth.
I believe that the Bible is capable of LEADING us to truth. Along with guidance through the Holy Spirit, we commanded to READ SCRIPTURE and compare each line to all others in order to FORM 'doctrine': (truth). We are to serve in TRUTH and Spirit.


Blessings,

MEC
 
Upvote 0

Hillsage

One 4 Him & Him 4 all
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2009
5,244
1,767
The land of OZ
✟322,350.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
As for critiquing Hagins understanding of tongues, where I previously stated that he was obviously deficient with his understanding of the purpose of praying in the Spirit, this is simply life. If we take the position "I don't care if you talk it right, I care that you GOT IT" then we will undoubtedly end up accepting not only incorrect doctrine but also a host of strange heresies along with the antics of people such as Todd Bentley.
I don't even remember what his understanding was on the purpose of praying in tongues. I do know his theology probably agrees more with you than me concerning the belief that it is the Spirit doing the praying. A position I keep saying I don't agree with because the Holy Spirit isn't in anyone IMO, and yet no one is challenging why I say/believe that.

Now, my two favourite scholars would be with the exegetical scholar Gordon D. Fee along with theologian Anthony C. Thiselton, who in my opinion have done more to strengthen the theological foundations of the Full Gospel probably more than most. Now one of the reasons that I value their work (along with that of many others) is that they are open to their work being critiqued and at times criticised by their peers where they will both allocate time within their books to addressing the concerns of their peers.
As I've said before I don't really know them and can not say I wouldn't appreciate their POV. For one thing, it has to be better than the fundaMENTAList views devoid of the SPIRIT of truth that I so often see here. But I also know nothing about the ministering power of God in their lives either. If all they do is speak in tongues then I'm still going to say Hagin's ministry did more for the body of Christ.

For instance, even though I believe that whatever these two men say is always worth listening to, when it comes to Fee, even though he undertook some superb and very helpful exegetical work on 1Cor 12 (First Corinthians, 1987), in my opinion his theological assessment of this same chapter leaves a lot to be desired, where I would view some of his opinions as being counterproductive; then there’s Fee’s strong egalitarian stance which in my view is embarrassing. With Thiselton, in spite of his incredible intellect and knowledge of “the spiritual matters” (12Cor 12:1), his approach to prophecy lets him down but both of these men are more than capable of accepting criticism.
And that is simply a matter of Christian maturity IMO. Those who get so irate concerning all the doctrinal disagreements here simply prove their own deficiencies spiritually speaking IMO. To disagree is one thing, but their/our acting the way so many do here is simply not "Christian" IMO.

Does that excuse bad doctrine where we are to walk blindly and uncritically accept his every thought simply because he had a ‘reported’ powerful ministry – that makes no sense.
I think you've read enough of me to know that I do believe doctrine is important, but not for the reason most believe IMO.


Remember, this thread is about the Scriptures and with the “Administration of tongues”, it’s not about who can speak in tongues more than others, or with how many sick people anyone may or may not have seen healed. In this context, people are not so much interested in the ‘reported’ successes of a particular ministry but with gaining a better understanding of God’s Word.
Yes it is about the 'administration of tongues', but as one can easily see that opens a great big door of opposing opinions too.

As for being able to pray in the Spirit, I’ve been doing this since the mid 70’s and as anyone can speak in tongues, be they adulterers, plagiarists, drunkards or with someone who is walking a fully Righteous walk, this should never be deemed to be a benchmark for someone’s understanding of theology.
Whereas I have been 'praying with my spirit' tongue since somewhere late in '72'. But even in this paragraph we are in disagreement, because you think it is 'the Spirit praying' to the Father (or God?). That doesn't even make sense practically speaking to me, let alone theologically from my POV.
 
Upvote 0

Biblicist

Full Gospel believer
Mar 27, 2011
7,023
992
Melbourne, Australia
✟51,094.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Whereas I have been 'praying with my spirit' tongue since somewhere late in '72'. But even in this paragraph we are in disagreement, because you think it is 'the Spirit praying' to the Father (or God?). That doesn't even make sense practically speaking to me, let alone theologically from my POV.
In spite of our differenes in this area, we at least have the benefit of being able to pray in the Spirit (tongues), whereas the cessationist who denies himself this right is compelled to look into this aspect of the Holy Spirit's ministry essentially as outsiders. Now when it comes down to one of two positions, where I need to choose between an experiential relationship with the Father which is based on a foundation of the Full Gospel, or one that is in most part non-experiential which is the cessationist position where doubt and uncertainty reigns supreme; then I suspect that we are (and others) are more than content to engage "sword-on-sword" with its embedded tensions which only helps us all to grow more in the Lord.
 
Upvote 0

Hillsage

One 4 Him & Him 4 all
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2009
5,244
1,767
The land of OZ
✟322,350.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
In spite of our differenes in this area, we at least have the benefit of being able to pray in the Spirit (tongues),

We do have a common benefit for sure.:oldthumbsup: Even if we can't agree on whether it's our spirit the the Spirit praying.


whereas the cessationist who denies himself this right is compelled to look into this aspect of the Holy Spirit's ministry essentially as outsiders.
Sadly this is so true. And pretty black and white in scripture.

Now when it comes down to one of two positions, where I need to choose between an experiential relationship with the Father which is based on a foundation of the Full Gospel, or one that is in most part non-experiential which is the cessationist position where doubt and uncertainty reigns supreme;
I can't read them, without feeling like you left out a ruling spirit....that being fear, which is simply manifesting as emotional doubt and uncertainty.

then I suspect that we are (and others) are more than content to engage "sword-on-sword" with its embedded tensions which only helps us all to grow more in the Lord.
Not sure of your meaning; "sword-on-sword" with who? The adversary?...I agree. Each other?...Not so sure. I used to think God would be proud of all those brethren I slew with scripture in the early years. Then one day the Spirit spoke and said; "People don't care what you know, until they know that you care." That was a pivotal point for me. I know many here are probably still thinking I never learned my lesson....oh well.

PS. I would also say that you and I demonstraight what I meant by 'having it' even though we don't 'totally agree' concerning it.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

Biblicist

Full Gospel believer
Mar 27, 2011
7,023
992
Melbourne, Australia
✟51,094.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Not sure of your meaning; "sword-on-sword" with who? The adversary?...I agree. Each other?...Not so sure. I used to think God would be proud of all those brethren I slew with scripture in the early years. Then one day the Spirit spoke and said; "People don't care what you know, until they know that you care." That was a pivotal point for me. I know many here are probably still thinking I never learned my lesson....oh well.
I suppose that the saying "sword-on-sword" does sound a bit combative but if you view it in much the same way as a friendly game between two swordsman, where both are using their skills/knowledge to hone their own views as each sword stroke is similar to "what about this perspective" where the other replies with a sword stroke which says "yes, but what about this...". As such both are involved in a healthy engagement where both are attempting to correctly apply the "sword of the Spirit"; there will always be those occassions where both will say "I didn't see that application of the sword coming, so next time I will equipped to use the same myself" which means that we all learn from one another.

This is why I prefer the more recent theologians and their commentaries as their work will usually engage with the work of other theologians. This means that I get to see not only what a particular theologian thinks on a certain matter but with how he views the opinions of his peers. With Anthony C. Thiseltons work on 1 Corinthians along with his massive knowledge of the various theologies regarding the Holy Spirit, as he produced his monumental work on First Corinthians in 2000, he followed up on this with a shorter work (with some major changes) in 2005 and in 2013 he released a summary of the 2000 years of teachings regarding the Holy Spirit. This means that we can gain a fairly thorough understanding of the various positions which helps us to broaden our understanding.

PS. I would also say that you and I demonstraight what I meant by 'having it' even though we don't 'totally agree' concerning it.
Exactly.
 
Upvote 0

Imagican

old dude
Jan 14, 2006
3,027
428
63
Orlando, Florida
✟45,021.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
In spite of our differenes in this area, we at least have the benefit of being able to pray in the Spirit (tongues), whereas the cessationist who denies himself this right is compelled to look into this aspect of the Holy Spirit's ministry essentially as outsiders. Now when it comes down to one of two positions, where I need to choose between an experiential relationship with the Father which is based on a foundation of the Full Gospel, or one that is in most part non-experiential which is the cessationist position where doubt and uncertainty reigns supreme; then I suspect that we are (and others) are more than content to engage "sword-on-sword" with its embedded tensions which only helps us all to grow more in the Lord.

I guess you didn't read or understand his previous post. You say that 'speaking in tongues' is 'IN THE SPIRIT'. Hillsage completely disagrees. The means that he justifies his 'tongues' NOT conforming to the rules Paul laid down is that the form of tongues he speaks in are through HIS OWN 'spirit'. Get it? Small 's' as in spirit as opposed to BIG 'S' Spirit.
So the two of you are NOT in agreement in any sense other than an insistence that the tongues that you profess are the 'tongues' mentioned in the Bible.
But I still insist that the use of the word 'tongues' in the Bible, EVERY use of the term is in reference to LANGUAGE. And mumbled gibberish that cannot be understood or interpreted is NOT 'tongues'. It IS exactly what it SOUNDS like it is: gibberish as in 'speaking to the air'. Incoherent NOISE. And these I offer as the LEAST. If we compare these 'gibberish tongues' to those practicing VOODOO, (which they certainly SOUND similar), then at worse such behavior COULD be a literal POSSESSION by some demon or 'evil spirit'. For that his what those practicing Voodoo openly ADMIT. When THEY behave in such a manner, they openly admit it is due to the DEMON that they have INVITED to possess their body.

Blessings,

MEC
 
Upvote 0

emekrus

The Righteousness and Faith Preacher
Apr 13, 2015
265
109
Nigeria
Visit site
✟22,317.00
Country
Nigeria
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I guess you didn't read or understand his previous post. You say that 'speaking in tongues' is 'IN THE SPIRIT'. Hillsage completely disagrees. The means that he justifies his 'tongues' NOT conforming to the rules Paul laid down is that the form of tongues he speaks in are through HIS OWN 'spirit'. Get it? Small 's' as in spirit as opposed to BIG 'S' Spirit.
So the two of you are NOT in agreement in any sense other than an insistence that the tongues that you profess are the 'tongues' mentioned in the Bible.
But I still insist that the use of the word 'tongues' in the Bible, EVERY use of the term is in reference to LANGUAGE. And mumbled gibberish that cannot be understood or interpreted is NOT 'tongues'. It IS exactly what it SOUNDS like it is: gibberish as in 'speaking to the air'. Incoherent NOISE. And these I offer as the LEAST. If we compare these 'gibberish tongues' to those practicing VOODOO, (which they certainly SOUND similar), then at worse such behavior COULD be a literal POSSESSION by some demon or 'evil spirit'. For that his what those practicing Voodoo openly ADMIT. When THEY behave in such a manner, they openly admit it is due to the DEMON that they have INVITED to possess their body.

Blessings,

MEC

So Imagican, you're audacious enough to declare(blaspheme) that all the miraculous results we obtained-some of which I shared here- are from demons? Will you be audacious enough to proclaim that?
 
Upvote 0

Imagican

old dude
Jan 14, 2006
3,027
428
63
Orlando, Florida
✟45,021.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Now, show me WHERE in the Bible we are instructed to FOLLOW that which we DON'T understand. In other words, HOW is one going to follow something that they DON'T understand?
That sounds more like the workings of the Devil than of God. For God is NOT the author of 'confusion', (which is a lack of understanding), but of PEACE, (which understanding always leads to), as in ALL 'churches of the Saints'.
So if God is NOT the 'author of confusion', WHO IS? I believe that the answer is perfectly CLEAR to those that understand this scripture.
Blessings,
MEC
 
Upvote 0

Imagican

old dude
Jan 14, 2006
3,027
428
63
Orlando, Florida
✟45,021.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
So Imagican, you're audacious enough to declare(blaspheme) that all the miraculous results we obtained-some of which I shared here- are from demons? Will you be audacious enough to proclaim that?

NOPE. All I have said is that I HAVE witnessed those practicing VOODOO and I have also witnessed those that practice 'speaking in gibberish' and calling it 'tongues'. I have studied the scriptures and my conclusion in understanding is that the 'gibberish' spoken by those professing to 'speak in tongues' are NOT the 'tongues' discussed in the Bible.
The MIRACLE of 'speaking in an unknown tongue' was the power of God through the Holy Spirit that allowed men who had NEVER learned a particular language to speak to those OF that language and be understood. That indeed was a MIRACLE. But the ONLY REASON that this 'gift' was offered was to FORM the 'church'. It was never meant to remain. Paul states that where there ARE tongues, (at that time), they shall CEASE, (when that particular 'gift' was no longer NEEDED to FORM the 'church'. When those spreading the Gospel to those of other languages didn't NEED to have such a gift any longer. And that TIME ended shortly after it was delivered. For by the time the apostles had all died, the 'church' was FORMED throughout the KNOWN world. Or enough of it that it could perpetuate itself.
Now days, (and the days shortly after the Apostolic Era, there was TIME for those that would spread the Gospel to peoples of other languages to LEARN their languages and THEN 'spread the news' WITHOUT the need for a miraculous GIFT of the Spirit.
But if you want to see my words as indicative of 'some other spirit' being the influence in 'gibberish' being the miracle mentioned in the Bible, so be it.
I KNOW how hearing gibberish spoken in the 'church' makes ME 'feel'. And I can't help but question why God would allow an honest and sincere seeker of the truth FEEL in any such manner in the presence of something HOLY. I don't FEEL that way when i hear pastors or ANYONE speaking TRUTH. I don't FEEL that way when someone repeats what is offered in the Bible. I don't FEEL that way when people are singing COHERENTLY. It's ONLY when I hear this 'gibberish' being spoken, or a pastor or anyone else speaking that which is NOT the 'truth' that I FEEL this way. Or when I am in the presence of what I KNOW is 'evil'. You know, demonic music, art, or even behavior of others. Like sexual behavior in front of others, on the dance floor, movies, etc......
So, can you blame me for how I FEEL that I have absolutely NO control over? For I do not CHOOSE to 'feel' the way I do when exposed to certain circumstances. It is my FIRM belief that it is directly inspired THROUGH the Holy Spirit which guides me in conviction.
If I were somehow FORCED to attend a 'church' that demonstrated 'gibberish' as tongues, it would be no different than someone pulling up beside me at a traffic light with their totally subversive RAP music playing so loud that my own car was bouncing. UTTERLY offensive. And trust me, I do not CHOOSE for such circumstance to BE 'offensive'. It just IS.
So, considering that the God is ALL about UNITY in the Body, how does one propose that behavior such as 'gibberish' being practiced offensively in front of others bringing any sense of unity EXCEPT in that 'group' that practices doing so?
NOPE, you cannot convince me that ONLY those few that do practice that which is contrary to the Bible are THE ONLY ONES 'born in Spirit'. That's utterly delusional so far as I'm concerned. No different than Jim Jone's group believing that THEY were the ONLY ONES on the planet that were following in TRUTH. Or those that insisted that it was OK to let Koresh sleep with their wives because he was teaching the TRUTH. My point isn't comparison of BEHAVIOR, but of BELIEF. Each of these examples BELIEVED that the rest of the world was LOST and they were the ONLY ones SAVED. In this respect, this is EXACTLY what I have ALWAYS heard from those that profess 'gibberish' to be the 'tongues of the Bible'. It is a manifestation of the Spirit. That upon being 'Baptized in the Spirit', members of charismatic 'churches' SPEAK IN GIBBERISH that they call tongues. And the REASON that no other 'churches' accept their behavior is that the other 'churches' are DEVOID of being 'Baptized in the Spirit'. That is about as ridiculous as the beliefs instilled in the congregations of either Jones or Koresh. It is EXACTLY what "cults" do to make the members feel SPECIAL. I don't need ANY 'man made' teaching to secure my faith in God through Christ. And anyone professing to BE A FOLLOWER of Christ that DOES need to FEEL special is in some serious TROUBLE.
Blessings,
MEC
 
Upvote 0

Hillsage

One 4 Him & Him 4 all
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2009
5,244
1,767
The land of OZ
✟322,350.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
I suppose that the saying "sword-on-sword" does sound a bit combative but if you view it in much the same way as a friendly game between two swordsman, where both are using their skills/knowledge to hone their own views as each sword stroke is similar to "what about this perspective" where the other replies with a sword stroke which says "yes, but what about this...". As such both are involved in a healthy engagement where both are attempting to correctly apply the "sword of the Spirit"; there will always be those occassions where both will say "I didn't see that application of the sword coming, so next time I will equipped to use the same myself" which means that we all learn from one another.
I wondered if possibly you might have been referring to our supernatural battles with the demonic. I know that I have been in a number of supernatural encounters like that and thought you might have.

You have proved to me that you truly do read and understand exactly what I am saying. We just know that we have 'that' which the "ignorant" and the "unlearned" do not have, according to scripture. And calling us gibberish talkers is just pretty much the same as saying "are you not mad". But they never use that 'exact' terminology, and I don't even 'wonder why'.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Biblicist

Full Gospel believer
Mar 27, 2011
7,023
992
Melbourne, Australia
✟51,094.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
I guess you didn't read or understand his previous post. You say that 'speaking in tongues' is 'IN THE SPIRIT'. Hillsage completely disagrees. The means that he justifies his 'tongues' NOT conforming to the rules Paul laid down is that the form of tongues he speaks in are through HIS OWN 'spirit'. Get it? Small 's' as in spirit as opposed to BIG 'S' Spirit.
So the two of you are NOT in agreement in any sense other than an insistence that the tongues that you profess are the 'tongues' mentioned in the Bible.

But I still insist that the use of the word 'tongues' in the Bible, EVERY use of the term is in reference to LANGUAGE.
As Hillsage has mentioned on a few occassions, his perspective is somewhat different to the majority where Thiselton's material should help you to gain a better understanding of the application of pneuma and to a less degree with our English word 'language'.

I will grant that if you were to read 1Cor 14 only through an English translation, where some tend to add in 'language' without any warrant then you can be easily misled. A good example of this is with 1Cor 14:10-11 where many translations translate the Greek 'phone' as language instead of sound which misses Paul's point completely.

Glossa (Thiselton p.1086).png


And mumbled gibberish that cannot be understood or interpreted is NOT 'tongues'. It IS exactly what it SOUNDS like it is: gibberish as in 'speaking to the air'. Incoherent NOISE. And these I offer as the LEAST. If we compare these 'gibberish tongues' to those practicing VOODOO, (which they certainly SOUND similar), then at worse such behavior COULD be a literal POSSESSION by some demon or 'evil spirit'. For that his what those practicing Voodoo openly ADMIT. When THEY behave in such a manner, they openly admit it is due to the DEMON that they have INVITED to possess their body.
All that I can say is that you must be visiting some very odd places that I've never been to - wow! You are obviously quoting from some cessationist pamphlet so I should probably suggest that you keep to observable facts and not to silly statements about Voodoo.
 
Upvote 0

Biblicist

Full Gospel believer
Mar 27, 2011
7,023
992
Melbourne, Australia
✟51,094.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
I wondered if possibly you might have been referring to our supernatural battles with the demonic. I know that I have been in a number of supernatural encounters like that and thought you might have.
The term "sword against sword" is really nothing more than a light-hearted way of referring to how Christians will often vigourously debate a given issue around the Word - which is certainly both a desirable thing and an activity that is healthy. It of course comes from Eph 6:17 and Heb 4:12 where the Word is a "two-edged sword"; though there are certainly those times where we can all fall for the trap of using the sword in a bit of a 'slash-and-burn' manner.

You have proved to me that you truly do read and understand exactly what I am saying. We just know that we have 'that' which the "ignorant" and the "unlearned" do not have, according to scripture. And calling us gibberish talkers is just pretty much the same as saying "are you not mad". But they never use that 'exact' terminology, and I don't even 'wonder why'.
There is a saying that "the have-nots will always decry about what the haves have" which probably reflects the human malady well.
How often do we ever (actually never) walk into a prayer meeting where we know that there will be many of us who will pray in the Spirit as well as pray in English, where we see the need to first ask everyone if they have a correct theological understanding of tongues before we begin!
 
Upvote 0

Hillsage

One 4 Him & Him 4 all
Site Supporter
Jun 12, 2009
5,244
1,767
The land of OZ
✟322,350.00
Country
United States
Faith
Charismatic
Marital Status
Married
though there are certainly those times where we can all fall for the trap of using the sword in a bit of a 'slash-and-burn' manner.
As I confessed earlier....I think it was this thread anyway; I cut too many off at the knees thinking I was doing God's work by defending correct doctrine. Today I don't even believe a number of those things. I am truly ashamed for those who lost the sword fight.


There is a saying that "the have-nots will always decry about what the haves have"
We sure see that played out here.

How often do we ever (actually never) walk into a prayer meeting where we know that there will be many of us who will pray in the Spirit as well as pray in English, where we see the need to first ask everyone if they have a correct theological understanding of tongues before we begin!
Those who know 'the truth' shall be free indeed.

Have a good one.
 
Upvote 0

Imagican

old dude
Jan 14, 2006
3,027
428
63
Orlando, Florida
✟45,021.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
So Imagican, you're audacious enough to declare(blaspheme) that all the miraculous results we obtained-some of which I shared here- are from demons? Will you be audacious enough to proclaim that?

Oh, so now it turns to 'blaspheme'. Figures. Good thing you're not a Catholic and we are aren't living in the 17th century huh?

Audacious? hmmmmm.................. I wonder? I guess it was audacious when the first man insisted that surgeons were killing people simply by not washing their hands before surgery. So in that respect, I guess maybe I am.

I have already responded to this exact request by others.

So let me offer it AGAIN:

What I have WITNESSED personally is this: I have WITNESSED Voodoo rituals where the practitioners, (one's that speak in tongues and flop around on the ground), behave almost EXACTLY like many I have witnessed in the Charismatic Churches.

the ONLY difference is that those practicing VOODOO state without any hesitation that they are being possessed by DEMONS or 'evil spirits', while those in the Charismatic Churches claim it's the HOLY SPIRIT.

Now, having READ the Bible and come to THE understanding of 'tongues', it is pretty clear that those in the Charismatic Churches are NOT practicing the 'tongues' spoken of or referenced in the Bible.

So that leaves me to make a choice. Do I TRUST those practicing VOODOO and their explanation of WHAT is actually possessing them? Or do I trust those that insist that it is the Holy Spirit guiding such behavior that is UTTERLY contrary to the Bible? I'll let YOU determine the answer to these questions.

There is NOTHING that you or anyone else can mutter that has NO meaning that can be expired by the Holy Spirit. There is nothing that can be DONE that is contrary to the TRUTH that can be inspired by the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit IS the TRUTH. And we are to SERVE in TRUTH and Spirit.

Now, you show me ONE instance offered in the Bible where people were speaking in tongues that were NOT understood by SOMEONE and I'll recant. But knowing that such an example doesn't exist, I'll bet YOU won't offer the same. I'll bet that there being NO offering in the Bible of ANYONE EVER speaking in the 'tongues' that YOU profess to be those offered in the Bible won't alter what YOU choose to believe in the least.

So it's not ME that is offering anything contrary to the Bible, (Blaspheme), I have simply pointed out what DOES exist in the Bible so far as TRUTH is concerned. And I have NO ulterior motive. But it seems that you and others that profess that gibberish IS tongues DO have an ulterior motive. One being an attempt to justify something that does not exist in TRUTH. The other an insistence that those that participate in such practices are somehow MORE holy than those that don't. You have PLACED yourself in a GROUP that has separated itself. Not only from the TRUTH, but from the REST of the Body as well. And what's worse? You pat yourself on the back for doing so.

What you have chosen to practice brings absolutely NO edification to the Body. And if it is not understood by even yourself? Absolutely NO possibility of edification to yourself so far as the Holy Spirit is concerned. The ONLY edification, SELF edification possible is contrary to anything HOLY. it is an appeasement of one's OWN flesh and one's OWN 'spirit'. And that is a very dangerous path to follow. For you cannot serve TWO masters. The master of the FLESH and this world is NOT the Holy Spirit.

Audacious. I like that word. So, to offer a direct answer to inquiry: If you are audacious enough to state that you can mumble in gibberish which is incomprehensible, to the point that NO ONE understands what you are saying including yourself, and that it is inspired by the Holy Spirit. I too am audacious enough to state that it is MY belief you are WRONG. You are NOT speaking in TRUTH according to God's Word. So that only leaves the inspiration of 'some other spirit'.

And I don't base my belief or understanding on a DESIRE to DO something that makes me FEEL good. What I offer is understanding directly FROM God's Word completely separate from a desire for ANYTHING but the TRUTH. My words are designed for the edification of the BODY. Yours seem to focus on your desire to make YOURSELF FEEL better. An attempt at justification that is at odds with everything we are offered in the Bible.

Blessings,

MEC
 
Upvote 0

emekrus

The Righteousness and Faith Preacher
Apr 13, 2015
265
109
Nigeria
Visit site
✟22,317.00
Country
Nigeria
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
Oh, so now it turns to 'blaspheme'. Figures. Good thing you're not a Catholic and we are aren't living in the 17th century huh?

Audacious? hmmmmm.................. I wonder? I guess it was audacious when the first man insisted that surgeons were killing people simply by not washing their hands before surgery. So in that respect, I guess maybe I am.

I have already responded to this exact request by others.

So let me offer it AGAIN:

What I have WITNESSED personally is this: I have WITNESSED Voodoo rituals where the practitioners, (one's that speak in tongues and flop around on the ground), behave almost EXACTLY like many I have witnessed in the Charismatic Churches.

the ONLY difference is that those practicing VOODOO state without any hesitation that they are being possessed by DEMONS or 'evil spirits', while those in the Charismatic Churches claim it's the HOLY SPIRIT.

Now, having READ the Bible and come to THE understanding of 'tongues', it is pretty clear that those in the Charismatic Churches are NOT practicing the 'tongues' spoken of or referenced in the Bible.

So that leaves me to make a choice. Do I TRUST those practicing VOODOO and their explanation of WHAT is actually possessing them? Or do I trust those that insist that it is the Holy Spirit guiding such behavior that is UTTERLY contrary to the Bible? I'll let YOU determine the answer to these questions.

There is NOTHING that you or anyone else can mutter that has NO meaning that can be expired by the Holy Spirit. There is nothing that can be DONE that is contrary to the TRUTH that can be inspired by the Holy Spirit. The Holy Spirit IS the TRUTH. And we are to SERVE in TRUTH and Spirit.

Now, you show me ONE instance offered in the Bible where people were speaking in tongues that were NOT understood by SOMEONE and I'll recant. But knowing that such an example doesn't exist, I'll bet YOU won't offer the same. I'll bet that there being NO offering in the Bible of ANYONE EVER speaking in the 'tongues' that YOU profess to be those offered in the Bible won't alter what YOU choose to believe in the least.

So it's not ME that is offering anything contrary to the Bible, (Blaspheme), I have simply pointed out what DOES exist in the Bible so far as TRUTH is concerned. And I have NO ulterior motive. But it seems that you and others that profess that gibberish IS tongues DO have an ulterior motive. One being an attempt to justify something that does not exist in TRUTH. The other an insistence that those that participate in such practices are somehow MORE holy than those that don't. You have PLACED yourself in a GROUP that has separated itself. Not only from the TRUTH, but from the REST of the Body as well. And what's worse? You pat yourself on the back for doing so.

What you have chosen to practice brings absolutely NO edification to the Body. And if it is not understood by even yourself? Absolutely NO possibility of edification to yourself so far as the Holy Spirit is concerned. The ONLY edification, SELF edification possible is contrary to anything HOLY. it is an appeasement of one's OWN flesh and one's OWN 'spirit'. And that is a very dangerous path to follow. For you cannot serve TWO masters. The master of the FLESH and this world is NOT the Holy Spirit.

Audacious. I like that word. So, to offer a direct answer to inquiry: If you are audacious enough to state that you can mumble in gibberish which is incomprehensible, to the point that NO ONE understands what you are saying including yourself, and that it is inspired by the Holy Spirit. I too am audacious enough to state that it is MY belief you are WRONG. You are NOT speaking in TRUTH according to God's Word. So that only leaves the inspiration of 'some other spirit'.

And I don't base my belief or understanding on a DESIRE to DO something that makes me FEEL good. What I offer is understanding directly FROM God's Word completely separate from a desire for ANYTHING but the TRUTH. My words are designed for the edification of the BODY. Yours seem to focus on your desire to make YOURSELF FEEL better. An attempt at justification that is at odds with everything we are offered in the Bible.

Blessings,

MEC


You know what Mr. Imagican, there is only one way to discern if what someone is doing is from God. And that is-the fruit (that comes out of it). So Mr. Imagican you really think the devil delivers people out of temptation, as I shared in my testimony of speaking in tongues. Do you believe the devil can heal someone permanently without any adverse effect (healing is one of the results I have seen people receive as I prayed for them in tongues)?

Do you think the devil can give joy (Holy Ecstacy)?-I do get an heavenly kind of ecstacy as I pray extensively in tongues many a time. Then most importantly, do you believe the devil will lead someone to glorify God? (Many a time, as I interpret my tongues during prayers, I find out I'm engrosed in magnifying my Lord and Savior Jesus). And I can go on and on.

Will you unduly attribute all these gracious works of the Holy Spirit to the devil? You know, our Lord Jesus says; "if you do not believe me by what I say, believe me for the sake of the works"...

My brother, unbelief is one of the worse sin ever. As a matter of fact, it is the worse sin, because it is what leads to the rest. Such as blaspheming the Spirit of God.

Please this is a food for thought. Re-think again, and stop the blasphemy.

God loves you, and I also do...

Remain Blessed!
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Biblicist

Full Gospel believer
Mar 27, 2011
7,023
992
Melbourne, Australia
✟51,094.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
Now, you show me ONE instance offered in the Bible where people were speaking in tongues that were NOT understood by SOMEONE and I'll recant. But knowing that such an example doesn't exist, I'll bet YOU won't offer the same. I'll bet that there being NO offering in the Bible of ANYONE EVER speaking in the 'tongues' that YOU profess to be those offered in the Bible won't alter what YOU choose to believe in the least.
Maybe this is the sort of comment that we might expect to find on a public forum but how could you make such an odd remark when Paul has already told us that absolutely no-one will ever be able to understand what the Holy Spirit is saying to the Father.

1Co 14:2 For one who speaks in a tongue does not speak to men but to God; for no one understands, but in his spirit he speaks mysteries.​

As this is one of the plainest remarks that Paul has made in the Epistles it staggers me that some people simply refuse to accept what he has told us. If Paul had of expected that any visitor who spoke in another language were to enter who could have understood what was happening then he would have mentioned this.

Then we have 1Cor 14:7-11 where Paul refers to tongues as being sounds similar to that of musical instruments, where in verse 10 he says;

There are a great many sounds (not languages) in the world, and no sound (not languages) is without meaning.​

If Paul had of intended to convey that speaking in tongues was a cognitive language then he would never have seen the need to connect tongues with the non-cognitive sound made by musical instruments.

With 14:19-23 Paul rebukes the Corinthians for allowing the unbridled use of tongues where all are praising God in the Spirit during times of congregational praise and worship, where he says that this will only serve as a negative sign where the unbelievers (and cessationists) who do not understand the things of the Spirit will say “you are mad”. As such, when everyone sings in the Spirit then it only serves to harden the hearts of those who do not know him where their negative response could harden their hearts even further.
 
Upvote 0

Imagican

old dude
Jan 14, 2006
3,027
428
63
Orlando, Florida
✟45,021.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
And another interesting FACT about the gibberish claimed to be the 'tongues' of the Bible by those that practice it.

Would the Holy Spirit REALLY favor GEOGRAPHY? In other words. Would the Holy Spirit USE a geographical LOCATION to offer DIFFERENT 'inspiration'?

For the gibberish professed to be tongues is GENERALLY a SOUTHERN thing. It pretty much took hold and PROSPERED in the SOUTH when those of the North knew NOTHING OF IT.

Even today, it's MOSTLY a SOUTHERN thing. And if one looks back it took off in 'black churches' LONG before it started to become a MOVEMENT in White Churches.

I am NOT a racist. Just posing FACT.

And if what I'm offering is the TRUTH, WHY? Why is that?

Is the Holy Spirit racist? Does the Holy Spirit exist to a GREATER degree in the Black community than the White community?

For almost ALL exclusively Black Churches ACCEPT gibberish as 'tongues'. Yet only a tiny minority of exclusively White Churches agree. Even those Churches with White pastors who profess that gibberish is tongues are usually a mix of both Blacks and Whites.

So is the Holy Spirit RACIST? I think not.

So what is the answer? Why is this 'gibberish' so much MORE prevalent in the 'Black religious experience' than the WHITE?
As Hillsage has mentioned on a few occassions, his perspective is somewhat different to the majority where Thiselton's material should help you to gain a better understanding of the application of pneuma and to a less degree with our English word 'language'.

I will grant that if you were to read 1Cor 14 only through an English translation, where some tend to add in 'language' without any warrant then you can be easily misled. A good example of this is with 1Cor 14:10-11 where many translations translate the Greek 'phone' as language instead of sound which misses Paul's point completely.

View attachment 160593


All that I can say is that you must be visiting some very odd places that I've never been to - wow! You are obviously quoting from some cessationist pamphlet so I should probably suggest that you keep to observable facts and not to silly statements about Voodoo.

Well, I have always lived in the Southern US or overseas. I have quoted NOTHING. The words I have offered are MY OWN. When I offer quotes I also offer the SOURCE. ALWAYS.

What I have offered is personal experience and proper interpretation of the Bible as it is OFFERED. Not how I choose to alter it to suit MY fancy.

The ENTIRE epistle written to the Corinthians that we have been dealing with is REBUKE offered by Paul concerning what he had heard of the STATE of the 'Church at Corinth'. From the first chapter to the last, Paul is trying to offer the TRUTH as opposed to what he had heard about the 'church' there FALLING APART. And the obviousness of this is the statement he offers concerning meat and milk. He offered that he WISHED that he could be offering MEAT, (that which pertains to MATURE Christians), but those to whom he was writing weren't even able to handle MILK, (that which is fed to BABES). And to ask if he should return with a ROD? Oh my. A rod is what was used to BEAT the disobedient CHILDREN of the time.
Yet you and others that insist upon practicing 'gibberish' as tongues have somehow been able to IGNORE the message and turn it around as it Paul is ENCOURAGING the Corinthians to CONTINUE in their contrary behavior.
I offered from the beginning that I have studied this issue for YEARS. Not from a source contrary to such behavior any more than sources that support it. The Bible DOES NOT support the usage or practicing of 'gibberish' as ANYTHING other than an attempt at SELF EDIFICATION. And in every offering by Paul in the letter to those in Corinth, he DISCOURAGES seeking SELF edification and INSISTS that ALL practice that which brings edification to the Body. This PLAINLY illustrates that Paul was NOT 'encouraging' SELF edification, but encouraging those that behaved in such a 'childish manner' to GROW up and PUT AWAY such childish behavior.
If what one utters is NOT understood by the BODY, then there is absolutely NOTHING to benefit such behavior.
But we DO see understanding and knowledge offered by those that practice VOODOO. They OPENLY admit that the utterance and behavior observed in their ceremonies is inspired by direct possession of EVIL spirits. And it's pretty obvious that those that actually INVITE the evil spirits to enter into them are doing so as much to appease the evil spirit as to be the FOCUS of attention.
Studies have been made where those that practice such behavior as 'speaking in tongues' and flopping around on the ground have been hooked up to machines capable of measuring brain activity during such episodes. All indication is that MOST that have been measured have brain abnormalities where the part that most have intact that restrains their compulsive impulses are basically MISSING. And that these people border on suicidal tendencies along with all sorts of COMPULSIVE behavior. In other words, when an idea is introduced that is enticing, they are often unable to RESIST temptation. They can't HELP themselves.
So in reference to this gibberish as tongues, when introduced into a church that practices these things, an individual with the type of brain malformation, due to birth or even injury, finds themselves in a position to basically brainwash themselves into practicing that which the 'church' holds so DEAR. They are compelled to EXCEL in that which others view as HOLY in an attempt to place themselves ABOVE others NOT demonstrating this behavior. In other words, they are doing it for ATTENTION: SELF EDIFICATION. An attempt to make those around them SEE THEM as 'special'. For even in those 'churches' that encourage this behavior, there are usually many more in the congregation that NEVER practice this behavior than those that DO. Just like in daycare or kindergarten there are always a handful of children that act out the MOST while most others DON'T.
But, of course, non of this factual information would mean a THING to those that are incapable of controlling their impulses. Since it's uncontrollable, they find the means to try and justify it instead.
And what if? What if everything I have offered is the TRUTH. And Satan is traveling around like a hungry lion seeking those to whom he may devour. Wouldn't it ONLY stand to reason that he would focus on those with the least ability to RESIST? Those whose brains were malformed due to birth or injury in a manner that makes it impossible for them to resist. In other words, wouldn't it ONLY stand to reason that Satan would USE those that are COMPULSIVE and can't control it to influence those that are NOT?
There are MANY MORE that find amusement attending services of Beni Hindi than actually take part in his charades. Get it? Just like paying to see a movie. There are many that WISH they were capable of ACTING like those in movies. But since they CAN'T, they are more than willing to PAY to experience others DOING what they LONG to do but are unable.
So here's my understanding in a NUTSHELL:
Some are just mimicking what they have been raised to mimic. Basically an immature form of self edification. Doing it for attention.
And then there are others that may well be LED by some 'spirit' to make noises and call it speech. But it's certainly not the HOLY Spirit that guides them. For the Holy Spirit is NOT going to give utterance to something that CANNOT bring edification. And the Holy Spirit is certainly not going to inspire one to seek SELF edification.

Blessings,

MEC
 
Upvote 0

Imagican

old dude
Jan 14, 2006
3,027
428
63
Orlando, Florida
✟45,021.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
I would like to offer this before the thread dies:

Paul offers this: 1 Corinthians 13:

8 Charity never faileth: but whether there be prophecies, they shall fail; whether there be tongues, they shall cease; whether there be knowledge, it shall vanish away.

9 For we know in part, and we prophesy in part.

10 But when that which is perfect is come, then that which is in part shall be done away.

11 When I was a child, I spake as a child, I understood as a child, I thought as a child: but when I became a man, I put away childish things.

12 For now we see through a glass, darkly; but then face to face: now I know in part; but then shall I know even as also I am known.

13 And now abideth faith, hope, charity, these three; but the greatest of these is charity.

What Paul is offering is this:

He is speaking to a people that he has heard is 'falling back' instead of moving forward in Christ. This is CRUCIAL to understand to come to a proper understanding of what he is saying. And in the words quoted here, he offers UNDERSTANDING in an attempt to get them BACK on the proper path.

We don't have the record of exactly what he had heard about them that encouraged him to write this Epistle. But we DO get a pretty good idea from Paul's words themselves.

He starts by pointing out that allowing membership into the Body of a man sleeping with his father's wife being UNACCEPTABLE and that they should KNOW this and cast him out of the 'church'.

Then he points out the divisions present in that everyone is arguing over WHO's Baptism is more important.

Each thing that he points out pertains to people insisting upon SELF edification instead of edification of the BODY.

And then he offers the words quoted above. Those words obviously point to a people, (group), that have gotten caught up in the FIRST baby steps of becoming a follower of Christ. And instead of growing IN to Christ, they have become stagnant or even possibly falling back on their previous pagan practices.

So Paul explains that without 'charity' being the focus, nothing that they can do is capable of bringing about their GROWTH. That the most important aspect of being a follower of Christ is CHARITY: looking out for OTHERS instead of themselves.

So he basically says, PUT AWAY YOUR CHILDISH WAYS. Instead of focusing on WHO is MORE holy or WHO is more spiritual or WHO should sit in the best seats or showing up in the 'church' to EAT a meal, the focus should be on CHARITY instead.

And then says without confusion: where there are tongues they shall CEASE. The only question is WHEN? For he does give this answer. Only those now days that insist upon bringing glory upon themselves by practicing gibberish and calling it tongues refuse to SEE the answer Paul offered.

So, for those that are confused or have never contemplated Paul's answer as to WHEN, let me offer some clarity.

First, let us go back to the previous chapter:

27 Now ye are the body of Christ, and members in particular.

28 And God hath set some in the church, first apostles, secondarily prophets, thirdly teachers, after that miracles, then gifts of healings, helps, governments, diversities of tongues.

(this shows the ORDER of importance of GIFTS of the Spirit. FIRST: apostles and then down the line. he doesn't even number miracles, healings, helps, governments, and diversity of tongues. But the important thing to note is that DIVERSITY OF TONGUES is LAST in the list. For what he insists upon NEXT is that those of the Body of Christ COVET the BEST gifts: prophets and teachers).

29 Are all apostles? are all prophets? are all teachers? are all workers of miracles?

30 Have all the gifts of healing? do all speak with tongues? do all interpret?

31 But covet earnestly the best gifts: and yet, (basically this means LET), shew I unto you a more excellent way.

When that which is perfect is come, then that which is IN PART shall be done away, (CEASE).

Now, the only question is: what IS 'that which is: "that which is perfect"?

And here is the answer: That which is perfect is that which Paul expounds upon being MOST important. Are we getting through yet? And what does Paul offer as the MOST important aspect of being a follower of Christ or GROWING into Christ? The answer SHOULD be obvious to anyone that claims to be the least bit 'Spiritual'. But here it is:

That which is perfect that comes AFTER the first baby steps of a follower of Christ is THIS: CHARITY. LOVE.

So everything offered in three chapters is Paul trying to invite the Corinthians to STOP being children, (he basically doesn't even classify them as children, but BABES. For he offers that they are unable to digest EVEN MILK), and start GROWING UP into the MORE PERFECT WAY, which is CHARITY, LOVE.

So in essence Paul is offering that when one reaches a PERFECT understanding of LOVE that the childish things they are focusing on will CEASE. For there is no longer a NEED for the FIRST steps when one reaches a point BEYOND the FIRST steps: grows up. And once they GROW UP, it is inevitable that they PUT AWAY THEIR CHILDISH THINGS.

This leaves only one final question to answer:

Do you BELIEVE that it's possible to come to a perfect understanding of LOVE? Not asking about PRACTICING. I'm ONLY referring to UNDERSTANDING. Do you believe that it's possible for men to come to a PERFECT understanding of the LOVE of God? So perfect that they are then able to SHARE IT WITH EACH OTHER?

Some will understand what I've offered. Some won't. For each matures at their own rate. Some put away childish things when they are fifteen. Some when they are twenty. And then there are many that will continue in childishness their entire lives. But once one comes to a PERFECT understanding of LOVE, they will no longer focus on 'childish' BABY STEPS leading TO that perfect understanding. And as PROOF that what I offer is correct, let me offer this as well:

Ephesians:

11 And he gave some, apostles; and some, prophets; and some, evangelists; and some, pastors and teachers;

12 For the perfecting of the saints, for the work of the ministry, for the edifying of the body of Christ:

13 Till we all come in the unity of the faith, and of the knowledge of the Son of God, unto a perfect man, unto the measure of the stature of the fulness of Christ:

14 That we henceforth be no more children, tossed to and fro, and carried about with every wind of doctrine, by the sleight of men, and cunning craftiness, whereby they lie in wait to deceive;

15 But speaking the truth in love, may grow up into him in all things, which is the head, even Christ:

16 From whom the whole body fitly joined together and compacted by that which every joint supplieth, according to the effectual working in the measure of every part, maketh increase of the body unto the edifying of itself in love

If you read these words and understand them, they are the EXACT words offered to the Corinthians only a BIT DEEPER for the Ephesians had OBVIOUSLY reached a maturity that the Corinthians had yet obtained. Paul could SPEAK more ADULT words to the Ephesians than he was able to speak to the Corinthians.

Blessings,

MEC
 
Upvote 0

Biblicist

Full Gospel believer
Mar 27, 2011
7,023
992
Melbourne, Australia
✟51,094.00
Country
Australia
Faith
Pentecostal
Marital Status
Married
And another interesting FACT about the gibberish claimed to be the 'tongues' of the Bible by those that practice it.

Would the Holy Spirit REALLY favor GEOGRAPHY? In other words. Would the Holy Spirit USE a geographical LOCATION to offer DIFFERENT 'inspiration'?

For the gibberish professed to be tongues is GENERALLY a SOUTHERN thing. It pretty much took hold and PROSPERED in the SOUTH when those of the North knew NOTHING OF IT.
Considering the rather sad legacy of the white church in the US South, where for a couple of centuries it supported and perpetuated the horrors of slavery, then I would not be surprised that any white majority congregations in the South could be both cessationist and quasi-racist today. To be fair, the early history of the national AoG (USA) was one of racial division as well, where I suspect that many of the white AoG congregations up until at least the 60’s in the South would have been racist.

Does the Holy Spirit favour geography? That’s an interesting question, where I’m sure that the Christians in South Korea are wondering about North Korea where we can even ask does the church even exist. After WW2 we could probably ask the same for Eastern Europe and the old Soviet Union as well. Then there’s those parts of the world that had never heard the Gospel for centuries. To return to the US South, whenever a Believer dared to challenge the status-quo where human abuse and torture was the foundation of so many US Southern states, I wonder how many Christians were killed by fellow racist “church” members who were upset with their views – so what would your answer be?

Even today, it's MOSTLY a SOUTHERN thing. And if one looks back it took off in 'black churches' LONG before it started to become a MOVEMENT in White Churches.
This is something that is probably best answered by an American, but from observation, such as with the cessationist Westboro Baptists, it seems that hard-core cessationist fundamentalism is essentially a white concern. Now from what I’ve observed over the years, I cannot recall seeing any black cessationist fundamentalists though I am certainly aware of the existence of black churches that do not welcome Caucasians, where I also understand that these churches are cessationist.

Considering the spiritual situation in the US prior to the onset of the Pentecostal movement, it seems that the US certainly shared a legacy with the other Anglo-centric nations where pragmatism and spiritual-indifference were the foundations of most churches. Where the history of the early Pentecostal movement in the US appears to have quickly divided along racial lines; the parallel move of the Spirit in places such as the UK, Europe, Scandinavia and Australia was vastly different where these churches reflected the population of each respective country which would have meant that they were white. Of course, the Pentecostal churches in places such as South America and Africa, who now comprise the majority of the worlds Christians, they would also be comprised of the majority people groups in thier countries.

I wonder how many there were in the deep South who up until the late 60's wondered if the Church truly existed?

I am NOT a racist. Just posing FACT.

And if what I'm offering is the TRUTH, WHY? Why is that?

Is the Holy Spirit racist? Does the Holy Spirit exist to a GREATER degree in the Black community than the White community?
I would say that the presence of the Holy Spirit would in all probability be far more evident within people groups who were on the outside of mainstream society. This would also apply to the Caucasians in many affluent Anglo-European cultures as well. In the US the Pentecostal movement had its roots not only within the Black and Hispanic cultures but it was strongly embedded within the disenfranchised white population as well. It was not until the 60’s where Pentecost became ‘acceptable’ to the mainstream white church which had its roots within the Charismatic movement.

Remember, you are making reference to a culture that only represents a minority of Christians worldwide. I should also add in that the church in the US has been nurtured within a society that from its very beginning was built on slavery where even a number of the founding fathers were themselves slave owners. So the US has always had to try and work out its theology and experience from within some very difficult paradigms and as the sign said in the American History section of the Smithsonian, “…racial inequality is something that Americans struggle with till this day”.

By the way, at the risk of sounding offensive, it is hard to see you as being anything other than a white racist. As the saying goes, "If it talks like a duck..." This would help to explain your form of cessationist fundamentalism.

Studies have been made where those that practice such behavior as 'speaking in tongues' and flopping around on the ground have been hooked up to machines capable of measuring brain activity during such episodes.
It seems that your hard-core cessationist imagination can get the better of you at times; how in the world could anyone be connected to a complicated machine with countless connections when they “flopping around on the ground”. This level of argument might be easily accepted by those of your own kind but try and avoid posting these type of remarks as anyone who has even the least amount of knowledge regarding this type of research would know full well that your remarks are nothing less than absurd and silly.

You should be aware that numerous studies have been undertaken in this field beginning in the mid 60's which has realised some very interesting, though inconclusive results. To my knowledge, there have never been any comparisons between Spirit filled Christians with those who are in a frenzied demonic ecstatic state. In fact, even though it is always easy to measure the brain waves of a Spirit filled Christian, I don't know if it would be possible (or maybe that its simply impracticle) to measure anyone who is in an ecstatic state.
 
Upvote 0
This site stays free and accessible to all because of donations from people like you.
Consider making a one-time or monthly donation. We appreciate your support!
- Dan Doughty and Team Christian Forums

Imagican

old dude
Jan 14, 2006
3,027
428
63
Orlando, Florida
✟45,021.00
Faith
Christian Seeker
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Considering the rather sad legacy of the white church in the US South, where for a couple of centuries it supported and perpetuated the horrors of slavery, then I would not be surprised that any white majority congregations in the South could be both cessationist and quasi-racist today. To be fair, the early history of the national AoG (USA) was one of racial division as well, where I suspect that many of the white AoG congregations up until at least the 60’s in the South would have been racist.

Really? Hmmm...........So now the attitudes of MEN prevail AGAINST the word of God. Slavery existed throughout the OT. And guess what, we are given DIRECT instruction concerning slavery in the NT. While it may be something that MEN abhor, it is certainly OBVIOUSLY acceptable to God. For it is clear that God either PLACED His children into slavery in order to punish or teach them, or at the very LEAST, allowed it to happen to them.

And Paul speaks OPENLY about slavery. Explaining to slaves AND owners how they are to live their lives. Basically slaves are told to ACCEPT their 'place in life' and be GOOD slaves. Masters are instructed to treat their slaves with compassion. But I guess that 'the world's understanding' is much more important to MOST men than what we have been offered in God's Word. Right? For we are offered NOTHING in the Bible instructing us NOT to have slaves or be slaves. We are instructed TO be GOOD masters or GOOD slaves. At least that is what is offered in MY Bible.


Or are you trying to indicate that GOD is a RACIST?

Does the Holy Spirit favour geography? That’s an interesting question, where I’m sure that the Christians in South Korea are wondering about North Korea where we can even ask does the church even exist. After WW2 we could probably ask the same for Eastern Europe and the old Soviet Union as well. Then there’s those parts of the world that had never heard the Gospel for centuries. To return to the US South, whenever a Believer dared to challenge the status-quo where human abuse and torture was the foundation of so many US Southern states, I wonder how many Christians were killed by fellow racist “church” members who were upset with their views – so what would your answer be?

My answer would be that the only indication in the entire Bible concerning geography would be that Israel is The Holy Land. Since it is the HOME of God's chosen people. Other than that, I have seen evidence that there have been Christians in every one of the countries you mentioned. While Christians are often persecuted for their faith, they still seem to exist ALL OVER THE WORLD despite the persecution.

This is something that is probably best answered by an American, but from observation, such as with the cessationist Westboro Baptists, it seems that hard-core cessationist fundamentalism is essentially a white concern. Now from what I’ve observed over the years, I cannot recall seeing any black cessationist fundamentalists though I am certainly aware of the existence of black churches that do not welcome Caucasians, where I also understand that these churches are cessationist.

I have NEVER MET a Black man that wasn't perfectly aware of what 'their churches' labeled the gibberish some speak. NOT A SINGLE one. From Africa, the Islands, North or South in America. But I have witnessed many Whites that know absolutely NOTHING about gibberish being labeled as the 'tongues of God'.

Considering the spiritual situation in the US prior to the onset of the Pentecostal movement, it seems that the US certainly shared a legacy with the other Anglo-centric nations where pragmatism and spiritual-indifference were the foundations of most churches. Where the history of the early Pentecostal movement in the US appears to have quickly divided along racial lines; the parallel move of the Spirit in places such as the UK, Europe, Scandinavia and Australia was vastly different where these churches reflected the population of each respective country which would have meant that they were white. Of course, the Pentecostal churches in places such as South America and Africa, who now comprise the majority of the worlds Christians, they would also be comprised of the majority people groups in thier countries.

I wonder how many there were in the deep South who up until the late 60's wondered if the Church truly existed?

That's a confusing question. For history dictates that those of the deep south were far more religious than most in the big cities so long as Europeans have dwelt in the deep south of America. Ever heard the expression: Bible Belt?

I would say that the presence of the Holy Spirit would in all probability be far more evident within people groups who were on the outside of mainstream society. This would also apply to the Caucasians in many affluent Anglo-European cultures as well. In the US the Pentecostal movement had its roots not only within the Black and Hispanic cultures but it was strongly embedded within the disenfranchised white population as well. It was not until the 60’s where Pentecost became ‘acceptable’ to the mainstream white church which had its roots within the Charismatic movement.

It is still not accepted in MAIN stream 'churches' in America. The Charismatic Movement considers itself 'mainstream' for the pace at which has grown. But numbers throughout the entire Bible would suggest that the MAJORITY or LARGEST numbers of PEOPLE would indicate a LACK of TRUTH rather than adherence. For throughout the Bible it has always been a TRACE or MINORITY that are TRUE believers and followers.

What I witness in the Pentecostal Charismatic movement is WORLDLY and SENSUAL rather than TRUTH as we are offered in God's Word. People pleasers seeking self edification rather than followers of God's Word or the TRUTH. Which is plainly seen in attempts to justify that which Paul warned AGAINST instead of encouraging as some insist.

Remember, you are making reference to a culture that only represents a minority of Christians worldwide. I should also add in that the church in the US has been nurtured within a society that from its very beginning was built on slavery where even a number of the founding fathers were themselves slave owners. So the US has always had to try and work out its theology and experience from within some very difficult paradigms and as the sign said in the American History section of the Smithsonian, “…racial inequality is something that Americans struggle with till this day”.

Once again, you are trying to indicate that there is something inherently WRONG with slavery. NOT according to the Bible. The only thing WRONG about slavery was being a BAD slave or a BAD master. It is MAN'S perception of slavery due to SELF that has placed slavery in a negative light. NO man WANTS to be a slave for the sake of self. But the TRUTH is we are ALL slaves to someone or someTHING. Most are just treated a bit better NOW than they were a couple of hundred years ago. Ever read the scripture that PLAINLY states: One cannot serve TWO MASTERS at the same time?


From a Biblical perspective: God's Word, I have seen nor found ANYTHING, not a single scripture that speaks of slavery being 'against God'. All indications are that from the time of Noah, God INSTITUTED slavery HIMSELF. For it was GOD that deemed one brother would a servant of the other. That wasn't MAN that instituted slavery, but GOD Himself made the determination.

And if what I'm saying is truth, then it would be those that RESIST the concept of God DEEMING men FIT to be slaves as those that are going AGAINST His Word for the sake of SELF.


By the way, at the risk of sounding offensive, it is hard to see you as being anything other than a white racist. As the saying goes, "If it talks like a duck..." This would help to explain your form of cessationist fundamentalism.

And not to be offensive for the sake of offense, I would say that you have chosen a path of your own design to worship a God of your own design or someone else's. Everyone on this planet is a racist by your or any other's definition. Some of you just try to PRETEND that you're not.

I don't choose to live behind pretense or outright deception. I try my best to LEARN the TRUTH and base my understanding on THAT rather than DESIRE. I didn't institute slavery nor did I alter the color of men's skin. And the TRUTH is, slavery or the selling of Blacks was designed and introduced BY the Blacks. The Whites just joined in and took advantage. Blacks SOLD Blacks to those from Portugal and it spread from there. The Whites did nothing other than what the Blacks did to their own people except make a BIGGER profit.

Racist? I would say that this too is a man made concept. For if you judged God by the same standards you are attempting to judge ME, that would make Him too a RACIST. Throughout the entire history of His relationship with MEN. How many of the prophets sent by God brought curses upon other RACES for their treatment of A specific race.

You see, my understanding is NOT 'that of this world'. I couldn't care less how I am viewed so long as my views are inspired by the TRUTH. And so far, in our conversations, you have attempted to spread more OPINION than anything resembling the TRUTH as it pertains to God's Word: The Bible.
But let me assure you, I take NO offense in your accusation of me SOUNDING like a racist. I most certainly am a racist. Just like you and everyone else. I just don't pretend to be something that I am not.
But allow me to offer this as well. While I may indeed be racist according to your definition, that doesn't offer an indication that I don't try to love EVERYONE equally. Other races, even my very enemies. For God has NEVER offered any indication that racism is improper or WRONG according to HIS definition.


It seems that your hard-core cessationist imagination can get the better of you at times; how in the world could anyone be connected to a complicated machine with countless connections when they “flopping around on the ground”. This level of argument might be easily accepted by those of your own kind but try and avoid posting these type of remarks as anyone who has even the least amount of knowledge regarding this type of research would know full well that your remarks are nothing less than absurd and silly.

Easy, the wires have little sticky pads on them just like those used when one does a stress test. You know runs as fast and as long as they can on a treadmill? Just like those in the space program are fitted with little connections to their bodies and those in films are connected in the same way to map motions of those running, jumping, flying, climbing up the sides of buildings, etc....... Guess you don't get out much. Ever watch a movie with computer generated graphics? Ever seen how it's done? Ever see those on the space station hooked up to wires that measure bodily functions while they are FLOATING around? Talk about absurd or silly. Oh my. Just go back and read what you offered.............
Better yet, do your OWN research. I'm sure you'll find MANY things that previous you would insist aren't possible but in truth are common practice. We hook up the same type devices to rats running around in cages and mazes. Yeah, I suppose that sometimes the wires fall off. But that is probably how they have learned to make em stick better and better over time. We sent men to the moon and you would indicate we can't make a wire stick to the head of someone flopping around on the ground. OH MY.
But what was MORE important were the wires stuck to the heads of those pretending to speak in tongues but were in fact speaking incoherent gibberish.


You should be aware that numerous studies have been undertaken in this field beginning in the mid 60's which has realised some very interesting, though inconclusive results. To my knowledge, there have never been any comparisons between Spirit filled Christians with those who are in a frenzied demonic ecstatic state. In fact, even though it is always easy to measure the brain waves of a Spirit filled Christian, I don't know if it would be possible (or maybe that its simply impracticle) to measure anyone who is in an ecstatic state.

Stating that: "to your knowledge" is meaningless. Of absolutely no significance. What I would ask is: Have you ever SOUGHT such information? Obviously NOT. For there is PLENTY. Possession is possession whether one claims it's source as the Holy Spirit or some other spirit. Those susceptible to hypnotism exhibit similar signs.

Many studies have been made SINCE the 60's. And YES, measurements CAN be made of those CLAIMING to be in an ecstatic state. And the conclusion among most that have done such research is that the 'state' that they claim to be 'ecstatic' is very similar to the same state that one exhibits when pretending, ACTING or fantasizing.

Blessings,

MEC
 
Upvote 0