Can you think of another known source for large amounts of code?
Can you support your claim?
Upvote
0
Can you think of another known source for large amounts of code?
Almost all code have chemicals interactions involved. Right now I read the "codes" off this page through chemical interactions happening in my eyeballs which sends an digital code to my brain which also works off chemicals then my brain sends signals to my hands which also works off chemicals and typing this code right here through the internet.You are talking about "code" as if it were this definite thing. I am noting that DNA is chemicals interacting and the 64 codons that comprise the code interact as chemicals do.
Are you unable to answer my question?
Almost all code have chemicals interactions involved. Right now I read the "codes" off this page through chemical interactions happening in my eyeballs which sends an digital code to my brain which also works off chemicals then my brain sends signals to my hands which also works off chemicals and typing this code right here through the internet.
There is no singular mentality in science and no singular reason people choose it as a profession.
Speculation. You can't judge the motivations of others. The private sector is more lucrative, academia is safer.
You also see scientists complaining that if they speak up against the fabricated evidence regarding global warming that they will be ostracised and will lose grant money. If your faith is based on what can be conclusively proven you don't have any faith in the first place. Faith is the acceptance of things unproven. As for the mercenary scientists, it's all about the grant money. No crisis, no grant money. No grant money, no job.
Conjecture. You don't know what they'll discover. They may discover, for example, that life after death has a MUCH more significant body of evidence than anyone wants to let on. As for the relationship between science and reality, my grandchildren will know that science is the study of the physical world and is limited to that. Period. If a scientist says that there is no proof of the supernatural the logical response is "Really, Sherlock? What gave you the first clue?"
It's intelligence that gives any code meaning.agents.
But the assumption that DNA is a "code" in the sense you mean it is a classic creationist trope that simply doesn't apply. If I look at the water dripping onto my windowsill right now, I could impose a code onto it, a code dependent on how the water drips and how long it is between drips. Does that mean that the dripping water is a "code" that required a designer? No. We looked at a simple natural manifestation of something and implied that it was a code. Similarly, we can look at DNA, and impose a code onto it (and I will freely admit that this is pretty easy to do), but in reality, it's just chemistry.
It's intelligence that gives any code meaning.
for example 1) "0110010100010010001000100010001000100100001001" and 2) "have a nice day" can be both codes. Codes must be read and cause a response. Both 1 and 2 is just black and white dots . The first may only make sense in a certain position in a computer program while the 2 we know the "code" is called "English". Now if someone doesn't understand "English" .. like a rat then no information is received even though it was send out.
The exact same thing with DNA. DNA by itself is pretty meaningless, Nothing but a butch of chemicals. It's the arrangement of that chemicals which has to be read and response upon which reveal the meaning of the code.
I'm done with debating or arguing with anyone on this thread,
How sweet and kind of you. Thank you for that. But I just feel like I've said all I, personally, have to say and that it is up to the Holy Spirit to do the rest. It is heart warming to see others speaking up for the truth, though.DON'T GO!
God bless you!How sweet and kind of you. Thank you for that. But I just feel like I've said all I, personally, have to say and that it is up to the Holy Spirit to do the rest. It is heart warming to see others speaking up for the truth, though.
Awesome, thanks.
Romans 1:20 is the most impressive cop-out in ancient literature. "It's totally obvious, anyone who disagrees is not only wrong but lying to themselves". All of this talk that we are "willingly ignorant"... No. We aren't. We're perfectly open to whatever evidence you have to present. It's just that none of it is particularly impressive, and we aren't impressed by faith.
Ahem ... cough.All of this talk that we are "willingly ignorant"... No. We aren't. We're perfectly open to whatever evidence you have to present.
Thank you!
ETA: Oops! Sorry! I thought you were talking to me.
Thank you very much!Lol. Well, I am now. May the Love of Messiah envelop you. May His Light guide you.
You seem to have a kind and gentle spirit. That's always good to see. I could use more of that myself!
Blessings to you, child. May the Love of Messiah envelop you. May His Light guide you.
Ahem ... cough.
(Sorry ... got something in my throat.)
This is why SETI is searching the heavens for a "code" as that would mean "life".
We're perfectly open to whatever evidence you have to present. It's just that none of it is particularly impressive, and we aren't impressed by faith.