You are the one that is failing to show a benefit. Can you prove that African and Asian people have a vitamin D deficiency in comparison to European people? They facts pretty much blow your off the cuff theory right out of the water.
The whole point is that: "The evolution of complex traits is one of the major enigmas in evolutionary biology. While we know a lot about phenotypic variation within populations, much remains to be explored about the genetic causes and consequences of trait complexity." Enigma means
They show exactly what I said they show that: NeoDarwinism approach of waiting for a new or existing Gene mutation to become common so as to effect a trait is inevitably slow. Darwinism, NeoDarwinism and PostNeoDarwinism have all been falsified. They are waiting for a new theory to come along to explain the mechanism of evolution but to date it is unknown. The evidence shows what I have been saying all along that the variation is there from the beginning. That information in the DNA is lost not gained over time. Some people believe that the universe started off the size of a mustard seed and all the information for everything was already there in the beginning.
I define it from time to time but not in ever post. For example Science (Neo-Darwinism) says: "The genetic variation on which natural selection acts may occur randomly, but natural selection itself is not random at all." Evo-Devo talks about natural laws or the laws of the universe so nothing is left to chance. You can go anywhere in the universe and end up with the same results as we see here because evolution is governed by the natural laws.
My family is jammed packed full of medical doctors and PhDs and for the most part they are idiots. But they do know a lot about a very select amount of information. For example my bother in law is a PhD in computers, he can tell you anything and everything about Cisco. But there is a lot about computers that he knows nothing about. It amazed me how simple of a question I can ask him and he does not have the answer. Once I asked a friend of mine with a PhD in physics about Quantum Physics and he knew NOTHING about the subject. The only thing he studies was classic physics. That surprised me that he knew nothing about Quantum Physics but it should not have. Is this enough or do you want me to go on to give you more examples? How about my brother. He is director of the Psychology Dept at the local hospital. I asked him a question once about memory and the brain. Perhaps it was more neurological but still he did not know the answer. He had never studied it. Yet he considers himself an expert on Psychology and he claims to know everything about psychology but he is really a dysfunctional idiot as far as I am concerned. How can you claim to know Psychology and know know about the Neurology and the Physiology of the brain? To the point where you can not even answer a simple question about memory and how memory is stored in the Brain. This is no reflection on Psychology in general. I did talk to a Cardio Psychology specialist once and she was pretty knowledge able about her area of expertise. Of course like most other people she knew very little outside of her area that she professionally dedicated herself to.
Look at Obama. He is a very intelligent person and yet he may go down into history as one of the most stupid presidents we have ever had. He has LOTS of competition from presidents with lower IQ for this distinction. You would think this is a great enigma but he was corrupted by what is considered to be one of the greatest (best) universities in the world. So you call this enigma a word salad because you just are not able to make any sense out of it. How can one of our most intelligent presidents be one of our most stupid presidents? One clue is that he is a pawn in the pocket of health care professionals. Their job is to match up care givers with care takers. Yet their objective seems to be to put as much money in their pocket as they can. There are many people that can do a much better job of running the health care profession. But these are the ones that paid to get Obama elected so what we end up with is Obama care: one of the biggest rip offs in the history of mankind. It is anything but affordable. Anyways you say this is all word salad to you, so there is no reason for me to continue to talk about it.
No I attacked your argument as weak. That is no reflection on you. I would question if it is even your argument as for the most part you just repeat what you hear from others. You need to present a stronger argument if you hope to have any degree of persuasiveness.
DNA falsified Darwinism and gave us the "modern synthesis" which is the political correct term for Darwinism. Then Gould and Eldredge came along with punctuated equilibrium and that falsified NeoDarwinism and gave us PostNeoDarwinism.
Evolution in general is a racist theory, you just take the theory to a new level of racism.
It looks like I am going to have to work on getting this more simple so that it can be better understood.
