You can see that I pointed out there were references - I didn't say quotes. So your suggestion that these aren't quotes is a strawman. Your own copies of them show that they are references, which is what I said.
If you are going to move the goalposts to "quotes", then......
I have not move the goal posts at all. I was the one who started off asking for quotes. I was the one who pointed out that neither Jesus nor the Apostles are ever seen quoting the APocryphal works, but you can see them repeatedly quoting from what we have of the OT.
OK, if something needs to be quoted with "it is written" or such to be in the Old Testament for you, then can you back up you claim by showing where each of the OT books you accept is quoted in the New Testament by first saying "it is written"? Otherwise, if you are going to be consistent, you'll have to start tossing books out of your old testament.
Apparently the word "typically" does not mean anything. I never implied that every quote did, but they typically do have some reference to the Old Testament or something to point you in that direction.
Matthew 1:22 "Now all this took place to fulfill what was spoken by the Lord through the Prophet"
Matthew 2:5 "...for this is what has been written by the prophet"
Matthew 2:15 "fulfill what had been spoken by the Lord through the Prophet..."
Matthew 2:17 "what had been spoken through Jeremiah the prophet was fulfilled"
Matthew 3:3 "this is the one referred to by Isaiah the prophet when he said"
Matthew 4:4 "It is writen"
Matthew 4:6 "It is written"
Matthew 4:7 "It is written"
Matthew 4:10 "It is written"
Matthew 4:14 "to fulfill what was spoken through Isaiah the prophet"
Matthew 5:21 "You have heard that the ancients were told..."
Matthew 5:21 "You have heard that it was said..."
Matthew 5:31 "It was said..."
Matthew 5:33 "you have heard that the ancients were told..."
Matthew 5:35 - Nothing referred
Matthew 5:38 "You have heard that it was said..."
Matthew 5:43 "You have heard that it was said..."
Matthew 7:23 - Nothing referred
Matthew 8:17 "fulfill what was spoken thorugh Isaiah the prophet"
Matthew 9:13 - Nothing referred
Matthew 10:35-36 - Nothing referred
Matthew 11:5 - Nothing referred
Matthew 11:10 "This isthe one whom it is written"
Matthew 11:29 - Nothing referred
Matthew 12:7 - Nothing referred
Matthew 12:17 "fulfill what was spoken thorugh Isaiah the prophet"
Matthew 13:14 "the prophecy of Isaiah is being fulfilled..."
Matthew 13:32 - Nothing Referred
Matthew 13:34 "fulfill what was spoken through the prophet"
Matthew 13:43 - Nothing referred
OK so half way through Matthew I count 30 things that my Bible emphasizes as direct quotes (it puts them in all caps). out of those 30 there is only 8 that are nothing referred for them.
Should we go on to Paul or James or anyone else to see what they say?
There are some big problems with that. First, it sounds made up (what basis do you have for that?), secondly, as has been pointed out, it's simply false - different Jews in different areas had different canons, including adding books after any arbitrary line you are making - including the deuterocanon, and third, it means that the whole new testament has to be removed from the Bibles, and that Christianity itself is a false religion, having no valid scriptures.
Jewish tradition puts Malachi as the last prophet until renewal during the messianic age. Remember Amos predicted the cessation of prophecy, and throughout the Old Testament God spoke to the people through prophets. What this means is NOT that we cannot have Judith or other works in our Bible...remember Bible is just a collection of books. But these other works are not utterances from prophets, or what would be considered Scripture (inspired and authoratative). The time after Malachi was a time for God's Word to be spread to the world in a written form. No longer was a Prophet to provide new revelations and new commandments untli the start of the Messianic age (which has yet to happen according to the Jews).
None of those contradict what is in the deuterocanon. For instance, what's wrong with the fish entrails? Do you have a verse that says it's a sin to use fish entrails? If so, could you point it out?
Do you believe that putting fish entrails on hot coals will keep evil spirits away? Is that not akin to magic? Seems the rest of the Bible says that God will protect you from the evil one...not buring fish guts.
Deut 18 says "inquires of the dead", which is not the same as praying for the dead. Changing what the text says doesn't show respect for the scriptures.
Are you deliberately ignore what is said in these verses?
Deuteronomy says "shall not be found among you anyone who practices ...a medium or a necromancer, or one who inquires of the dead"
you do know what a medium is right? That is someone who says they can talk with the dead.
A Necromancer is someone who claims to be able to raise the dead and make the dead do what they want.
God is pretty clear there...their dead...quit worrying about them and take care of yourself.