For homology? You have none. Like I've been saying.
I already posted the evidence. Are you telling me you can't spot the evidence for homology in this picture?
Evolutionists using the very same phylogenetic methodology you hold as gospel proof of common descent, are now suggesting that tetrapod digits have evolved again independently through novel evolutionary pathways. This is the exact opposite of homology that you previously asserted. This is the evolutionists' "peer-reviewed" argument, not mine. Deal with it. Or keep dancing and show everyone how much denial you're in.
And I disagree with them. Since they don't have any real evidence of a completely novel feature evolving, your claims sit there without much punch.
Upvote
0