One of the prime attributes of design is integrated complexity. Another is testing.
No it isn't, not at all. Complexity is just a sign that something is complex. It's a huge leap to say "
I don't understand this completely, therefore a higher power who did understand it must have created it!" is just insane. What does make sense is to say "
I don't understand this, so I will study it, propose theories, and work on revising those theories.".
Start there. Not end. Darwinism makes you feel like youre doing something. But thats about it.
Again, typing something that isn't really saying anything. Start where? End where? What? I said the concept of design is primitive, what does that have to do with starting, finishing, or me doing something?
For the Darwinist. But evidence to the contrary is not a problem.
For everyone. If this evidence is so prevalent, why not provide it? Holy scriptures do not count, since they could have been written by men, and there is nothing to suggest they are divinely inspired at all, apart from the books themselves saying so. So, present the evidence.
You believe in Darwinism therefore you have no choice but to relegate ancient text to ignorant hominids. You are a materialist therefore you have no choice but to constrain text to derivations from the purely material mind. This is your position. These are your beliefs.
You have this backwards. I believe the ancient texts were written by bronze age goat herders who didn't know anything about the world, so I consider the texts flawed. Therefore, I believe in evolution, because it makes sense. It's not Darwinism, by the way. You do realise that the theory of evolution has evolved (Hah!) a long way since Darwin, right? He just got the ball rolling, that's all. It has very little to do with him, nowadays.
The human body was designed. Begin there. You probably don't have a firm grasp on what evidence is. When you turn on your radio, this is evidence for radio waves. When you use Radar, and you get returns, this is evidence for radio waves. When you use other instrumentation, which measures output from a transmitter this is evidence for radio waves. You have never seen radio waves have you. A needle on a measuring device is just needle moving. Obviously, Lem Troper from Houston 98.7 is bacteria inside the radio having developed the ability to talk. The insanity never ends. So by your logic, there is no evidence for radio waves. The way you know that it is radio waves comes from study, and the realization of the limits of a radio, and the surrounding construct of the apparatus. You merely repeat what you hear others say, and you have a lot to learn. The human body was designed. Thats where you are right now. Start there.
That's a claim. A claim made from nowhere. I could just as easily propose that aliens dropped us on this planet as seeds millions of years ago, and we grew since then. We could be space-weeds, the nuisance of the galaxy.
This, of course, is stupid, and there's nothing to back it up, besides the fact that I just said it, right there. Much like intelligent design.
I think you don't know what evidence is, there is evidence of radio waves because of the fact we can measure them, observe them, and control them, with the right equipment. That's evidence they exist.
The whole radio thing is a really bad analogy, since it's completely different to the idea of intelligent design, and the fact that radio waves are a human construct, we made them, we control them, we detect them.
As for study, what exactly do you think evolution is? It's studying life. That's how we find things out. With creation, there is no studying, it's just "Bonk! God made life!
".
You're merely repeating what others say, just that what you're saying has been around for alot longer than what I'm saying. The human body wasn't designed. Start there.
Its the answer to materialistic belief. Chance building a human system is not applicable to the real world.
It's seeking to find the answer to an important question, as opposed to claiming to know the answer without any evidence to back it up.
Everything happens by chance, it's very applicable to the real world.
I never said anything about what you feel. What you do on your own time is none of my concern.
But...
Not because he felt peace, or a theist will inevitably feel peace or comfort, that bacteria can turn into men.
Granted, I didn't fully understand this poorly worded sentence of yours, but I took it to mean that you think ToE believers take some comfort from "bacteria turning into men". Even though that's not what the ToE actually says.
It seems like you're more concerned with reciting a planned agenda. Let it out. In the mean time, Darwinism is rejected based on scientific evidence. Chance cannot build a man. The remnants of man's beginning, what you refer to as "comfort", will resurface when conditions are rectified. But Darwinism is rejected long before that.
I have no agenda, besides trying to get people to think, a little bit. It certainly ain't planned though, I'm wingin' it, baby.
Darwinism may be rejected since it's at the slight disadvantage of being a made up word, by you. The theory of evolution, however, is far from being rejected, in fact, most of the scientific community backs it, I do believe. Chance cannot build a man, but chance can bring about the means for life to adapt and thrive, which is all that is being implied.
As for the "remnants of man's beginning"... Well, we'll just have to see what new discoveries science makes, won't we? Best get comfortable though, because unless your God pulls his socks up, "Darwinism", as you so wrongly put it, ain't going nowhere, it's only going to get stronger, the more evidence we find.