Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Except that's false.Common sense, a zero ability proccess can't produce something a lot greater, look at computers for example.
Adding or changing information randomly to improve something is related.
Common sense
, a zero ability proccess can't produce something a lot greater, look at computers for example.
Look at computers and see if by adding random bits to something you improve it, add functionality, discard errors, and perfect it.
Adding or changing information randomly to improve something is related.
Except that it does.Evolution do not have an 'engine' to produce something.
Except that it does.
Reproduce, mutate, survive, repeat.
Except that it does.
Reproduce, mutate, survive, repeat.
It's evolution. Please quit calling it descent with modification within kinds.That's descent with modification within kinds. Please quit calling it evolution.
Nope, and neither do you.Don't you know what kinds means?
You're almost there - the survivors of natural selection continue to breed, resulting in generations of new individuals that acquire new mutational variations, which are then selected for survivability; the survivors breed again and so-on. Rinse and repeat. The survivors of each generation pass on the genetic mutations that aided their survival to their offspring. That's how advantageous changes accumulate.Apply that to a simulation, what do you get, almost nothing, just random change added and if it survives it stays, thing is evolution can't stack improvements over improvements as they claim it can do.
You're almost there - the survivors of natural selection continue to breed, resulting in generations of new individuals that acquire new mutational variations, which are then selected for survivability; the survivors breed again and so-on. Rinse and repeat. The survivors of each generation pass on the genetic mutations that aided their survival to their offspring. That's how advantageous changes accumulate.
Random changes alone won't go anywhere useful, but random changes with non-random selection generation by generation can produce very successful results.Random changes can't build anything if you think about it, more ''''common sense'''' And they don't explain why they do.
This is the creationist two step. Ignore selection and claim that variation cannot produce anything. Then ignore variation and claim that selection only reduces "information".Random changes can't build anything if you think about it, more ''''common sense'''' And they don't explain why they do.
Nope, and neither do you.
Lol. So Christians are both kinds at the same time? Thanks for the QED, you really don't know what kinds means, do you?Aman:>>Don't you know what kinds means?
Sure I do. If you don't know what kinds are, then you CANNOT understand Genesis.
His kinds are the temporary kinds which Jesus made with His own Hands. These "common ancestors" are subject to death.
Their kinds are the Eternal kinds which God the Trinity creates. These living creatures are NOT subject to death.
Adam was formed physically, subject to death, by Jesus/Lord God. Genesis 2:7 Humans (descendants of Adam) are His kinds.
Adam was "created" in God's Image or born Spiritually in Christ Eternally, by God the Trinity. Genesis 1:27 Christians are Their kinds, eternal kinds.
Random changes alone won't go anywhere useful, but random changes with non-random selection generation by generation can produce very successful results.
Apply that to a simulation
, what do you get, almost nothing,
just random change added and if it survives it stays
, thing is evolution can't stack improvements over improvements as they claim it can do.
That's descent with modification within kinds
Please quit calling it evolution
Don't you know what kinds means?
Random changes can't build anything if you think about it, more ''''common sense'''' And they don't explain why they do.
what if we will find a computer that is able to replicate itself like a living thing?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?