Odd comment, how could I answer to points that you never brought up? Sure, I brought them up, why is that a problem? Because you have no answers? Attacking the questions you cannot answer again, as bad questions?
Of course it did, and the way your post was presented, best I can tell, you never answered my concerns. Is this the "your discussion isn't a proper discussion at all" cop out that I predicted in my last post? so predictable.
I did no google search at all. Is that another one of those scientific assumptions? you know, another of the wrong ones.
. So what your saying is you assumed I did a search because I was able to keep up enough to get the gist of what you were saying, and since in reality, no search was necessary, that gist is actually pretty simple when it comes to the basics. Oh, and sorry to burst your little bubble there, but to your credit, them were some mighty impressive words.
To bad you all but admit you were trying to intimidate with them. Don't you know, by now there is nothing you can do that can't be done? And with the tiniest bit of explanation the same explanation that explained it to you, most can easily understand it, if they choose to bother. IOW, it's not so complicated you can use that as another excuse, as in your "you have no right to deny evolution" if you don't know what I know.
I have every right, and every right to expect you to prove it in spite of the goings on about why you cannot, and then your recent waffling on that, you know where the one who says we can't offer proof, said they proved. That was great, BTW.
Read on to where I comment more on that.
I absolutely did not ignore it, but I already commented on that. And these are the untruthful people we are supposed to rely on for the truth??
Problem with that is, you say it cannot be proven, even in this very post, yet, you now say you have proved it? So, you didn't prove anything accept for how to trip over your own words.
I wonder, was that written up just for evolutionists, as another catch all when they have no proof? More unreasonable concepts to help a ridiculous cause, but it's true, you need all the help you can get, but to grab at such weak straws, and right here where all can see? That can't be helping your case. Yikes.
You have what you have until something else comes up, so lets simply do as we always have before some hot shot suggested that very poor excuse, and prove it, if something changes, we can cross that bridge when we come to it. Simple. Today's proof on any given thing, may stand forever, so again do the obvious/logical, and roll with it and then change it if necessary, and stop using it as the frail excuse that it is.
Kind of like my having to keep repeating what I do to evolutionists...yeah, I get that.
Doesn't surprise me you would make such a ridiculous statement...one that you can't possibly know as a fact. That's much the way evolution is seen as fact. "It is because we say it is, you need no proof"
Another thing I just realized, in spite of my requesting several times here, that along with your proof, you offer explanation so most can understand what you were talking about, and exactly how your proof proves evolution, you chose not to do that. Those were both very reasonable proposals so we could all join in and debate it. But while not much explanation was required, yet could have been helpful, you chose not to stick with that part, You figured you'd leave it at what you thought was so complicated no one would be able to understand it, and then not allow them to deny evolution if they couldn't...sneaky.
Why would you do that, or not do that? You didn't want them to understand it, (And I'm not even going to get into the ego aspects you more than made clear) you wanted to keep things confused, your way of seemingly giving yourself a leg to stand on. How low was that?
But, and I get so tired of saying it, if that's the type thing you feel you must do to back your cause, you must not have much of a cause.