DogmaHunter
Code Monkey
- Jan 26, 2014
- 16,757
- 8,531
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Atheist
- Marital Status
- In Relationship
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
evolution is unfalsifiable too. so evolution isnt science either.
Sorry about the language. I'll try to be clear.
Once speciation has occurred, it is by definition a new species.
there aren't magical/super natural lines that need to be crossed.
One problem yours is not a real rope, it's a pretend one, one imagined, conjecture, an assumed rope, or something I'm certainly not going to put my faith in....huge difference.
So basically what you are saying seems to be that you have no idea whatever about how evolution occurs. You have no idea how the repeated branching of speciation can create new families of creatures. You have no idea of how a stochastic process works to produce novel structures.its ok. its just a general note since i dont check every word in the dictionary.
true. but there is a difference between a species and a family for instance. a new species is still basically the same creature. so we may get a new species of a cat, but its still be a cat and not something else.
actually there is. for instance: if we will have a self replicating molecule, it will not evolve stepwise into a walking robot for instance. since there are no small steps into a robot.
off course i talking about population and not about individual. so according to evolution a population of cats can evolve into something that isnt a cat after millions of years. right?I have JUST informed you that in evolution such a thing does NOT happen.
Just how big a of a troll are you?
You might be able to make such a false claim. An honest scientist could not.why such a fossil will falsify evolution? we can claim that that fossil somehow get into the wrong layer or something. evolution cant be falsify even in this case. so no.
why such a fossil will falsify evolution? we can claim that that fossil somehow get into the wrong layer or something. evolution cant be falsify even in this case. so no.
so how i can falsify evolution?
actually you are the one who have no idea since you cant prove that one kind of creature (population of creatures) can change into another kind.So basically what you are saying seems to be that you have no idea whatever about how evolution occurs. You have no idea how the repeated branching of speciation can create new families of creatures. You have no idea of how a stochastic process works to produce novel structures.
actually you are the one who have no idea since you cant prove that one kind of creature (population of creatures) can change into another kind.
The only problem here, is you being scientifically illiterate.
Actually I do understand Darwin’s ideas as I’ve got a mainstream biology degree. Evolution isn’t Abiogenesis, which is the origin of life from chemicals. Evolution explains how life changes over time due to mutations, an imperfect DNA repair mechanism; and a slowly, continually changing environment due to plate tectonics. A static lifeform would just go extinct. The opposite of evolution is extinction not creationism.
What's a "kind?" In evolution, all that has to happen is the repeated branching of speciation.actually you are the one who have no idea since you cant prove that one kind of creature (population of creatures) can change into another kind.
Who is asking for faith in anything?
Who is asking for faith in anything?
Scientific theories aren't about faith, they are about understanding. It's purely about knowledge acquisition, nothing else.
And you are right. A single out-of-order fossil would probably be regarded as an anomaly rather than a wholesale falsification of the entire theory of evolution.
To truly falsify our understanding of historical evolution of species, what we'd really expect to find is a whole lot of fossils completely mixed up.
actually even if it was true evolution has no problem with such a thing. in this case we can claim that most species evolved quickly.
its very similar to what we find with the cambrian explosion. and this is why they call it "explosion".
"Kind" isn't a real thing (per biology). Nor has anyone ever demonstrated the existence of any biological barriers related to such a thing.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?