Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You misunderstand, or more precisely, you just made that up...prove evolution.
I have never put a piece of notebook paper into the business end of a blow torch, but because I know things that I have put in the blow torch flame will burn, I have a theory the paper will burn.
I can run that science experiment, see the paper will indeed burn, and now I have proof, hence, that theory has now been proven to be fact. Science has now proven the paper will indeed burn.
Simple theory, and simple proof that even you can understand.
Now, just for laughs, explain how that is not a simple science experiment, and how it does not turn my theory to proven fact?
You misunderstand, or more precisely, you just made that up...prove evolution.
I have never put a piece of notebook paper into the business end of a blow torch, but because I know things that I have put in the blow torch flame will burn, I have a theory the paper will burn.
I can run that science experiment, see the paper will indeed burn, and now I have proof, hence, that theory has now been proven to be fact. Science has now proven the paper will indeed burn.
Simple theory, and simple proof that even you can understand.
Now, just for laughs, explain how that is not a simple science experiment, and how it does not turn my theory to proven fact?
thanks. so science can prove things after all.
so you can detect design when you see a car or not? you dont think its e asy to detect design in a car?
Don't do it! It isn't worth it. Trust me...It's too annoying seeing all these responses to posts I can't see, I'm going to risk my blood pressure and take said posters off ignore.
Evolution theory....is a scientific theory.
You know....one of those scientific theories that are never considered proven.
So...... yeah.
That's not a scientific theory.
That's not a scientific experiment.
Neither were scientific.
Try it again in vacuum.
See what happens.
Try it again in vacuum.
See what happens.
Genetic engineers have made a whole genome?right. the same with a genome: we never seen a genome that was not the result of design (genetic engineering).
Dance.
There you go again, just because you say so. Did you not read my post asking for explanation, or is that part a problem for you?
so you can detect design when you see a car or not? you dont think its e asy to detect design in a car?
so evolution is brilliant now? from your own link:
so evolution is brilliant now? from your own link:
"Luckily, individual components of the bacterial flagellar motor have indeed been found elsewhere"
this is simply false. those parts are only similar but no identica. they even admit it: "the genes that code for them are so similar they have clearly come from the same genetic ancestor".
so first: this claim is false. and secondly: the fact that some similar parts of the flagellum can be found in another system doesnt prove they evolved from each other. a car and an airplane share many parts too, but they dont evolved from each other and even if they were able to reproduce they c ant evolve from each other in small steps.
here is a simple way to detect design in most cases: the chance of that object to be the result of a natural process. we know for instance that the chance for a car to be the result of a natural process is radically low. therefore we can detect design when we see a car since a natural procoess cant explain how such a car can evolve naturally.Don't answer my question with another question.
Don't try to dodge the question.
Again: What is the method by which design can be objectively detected?
You claim that you are able to detect design. Put your money where your mouth is. Explain to us the method by which this can be done objectively. In such a way that we can take random objects, any objects, and determine if they are designed or not, using your method.
Again, don't dodge. Just answer the question. You claim to be able to detect design in anything. So I ask you: how?
I responded to your nonsense of burning paper.
Then you repeat your experiment in a vacuum. The paper no longer burns.
So how factual is your "theory"?
Either your "theory" is wrong, or it is incomplete.
In either case, it's not a fact.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?