- Dec 31, 2016
- 7,221
- 3,311
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Baptist
- Marital Status
- Married
You mean other than the fact the universe and life exist, and no other alternative is proven.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You mean other than the fact the universe and life exist, and no other alternative is proven.... but has absolutely zero scientific evidence to support it.
You mean other than the fact the universe and life exist, and no other alternative is proven.
There is apparently a multitude of ways Creationism is attempted to be falsified. Doesn't the fact it hasn't make it a solid second opinion.
What part of "Creation plus some form of evolution" did you not understand?No its religion. Moreover, its contrary to physical reality and therefore stupid (this adresses YEC).
prove that a creature can evolve into another kind of creature. say a cat to a dog or a
squirrel.
Cats wouldn't evolve into dogs or squirrels, full stop. Not in 1000 years, not in millions of years, not in billions of years. Simply never.since we cant do that (its suppose to take millions of years) its just a belief.
But, you’re not saying evolutionism is a proven fact either… a theory, right?
Evolutionism isn’t falsifible either.
For argument sake, we can just consider it a second opinion if you want.
I certainly don’t discount science and even some form of evolutionary process (as in creation plus some form of it), but by your own definition it still isn’t proof, even after over a 100 years of attention by the best scientific minds.
You mean other than the fact the universe and life exist, and no other alternative is proven.
Well... you know you're running out of good scientific explanations when you start using words like "stupid" and "ignorance."Classic argument from ignorance.
Well... you know you're running out of good scientific explanations when you start using words like "stupid" and "ignorance."
When is asking someone to defend their position on something not apt?Not if their usage is apt.
When is asking someone to defend their position on something not apt?
Well, I can't argue that.When the defence points used to defend the position are either stupid or ignorant of science.
It's not that hard!
Well... you know you're running out of good scientific explanations when you start using words like "stupid" and "ignorance."
When is asking someone to defend their position on something not apt?
Well, I can't argue that either.If you did have proper evidence, you'ld just point to said evidence, instead of appealing to scientific ignorance.
In science, theories are never proven.
Showing that you are dishonest, is fairly easy.
Just about everybody here has been explaining to you, at length, at how in science, theories are never proven.
Yet, there you are, months later, still demanding us "to prove" evolution theory.
What part of "Creation plus some form of evolution" did you not understand?
Convince someone no proof is necessary, nor should it be expected, and they'll believe anything
Wonder who the first was to reason out the no proof in science thing? I'd just like to see what they look like.
prove that a creature can evolve into another kind of creature. say a cat to a dog or a
squirrel. since we cant do that (its suppose to take millions of years) its just a belief.
What part of "Creation plus some form of evolution" did you not understand?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?