Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
but it will never produce a complex system. if for instance we need at least 3 parts to evolve a new function random changes+ selection will not help in this case since there is nothing to select in that case.
Evolution isn't a teleological process. It randomly modifies what already exists and keeps whatever allows survival & reproduction.but it will never produce a complex system. if for instance we need at least 3 parts to evolve a new function random changes+ selection will not help in this case since there is nothing to select in that case.
Which is evolution
Why? If it is evolution, it's fine to call it evolution.
Every creationist seems to have its own personal definition.
Biologically, it has no specific meaning. It's not scientific jargon. It has no scientific implications or connotations.
Assuming an abstract definition, where "kind" can apply to any taxonomical context, the statement that "things reproduce after their kind", is correct.
Every newborn is of the same species as its direct parents.
And the process of speciation is vertical, not horizontal. Which means that speciation always results in sub-species.
The common ancestor of house cats and lions, was a feline. Both are "still" felines.
The common ancestor of humans and chimps, was a primate. Both are "still" primates.
The common ancestor of primates and chimps, was a mammal. Both are "still" mammals.
Etc.
Because people rejected God's Truth in Genesis and were caught in the Snare which God set to catch them.
Soon, the entire false ToE will be discredited since it eliminates God from His own Creation.
The ToE also is incomplete since it cannot tell us of true Human origins, which took place on another world.
Scientists have also classified the sons of God (prehistoric people) as Humans. (descendants of Adam) Changing God's Truth of descent with modification within kinds into the filthy word "evolution" and force teaching it to innocent children in Public Schools will not go unpunished.
Amen.
Humans (descendants of Adam) produce other Humans sexually. There is NO other magical process which changes prehistoric people, whose origin was with LUCA, in water, into Humans (descendants of Adam made from dust). God tells us that today's modern Humans INHERITED the superior intelligence of Adam which is like God's intelligence. Genesis 3:22
There are only two kinds. Trinity kinds are eternal kinds and His kinds are temporary kinds which are subject to death. Want to know WHY God made two kinds?
Amen. Thanks for showing us WHY there is no magical evolution but simply sex mixing creatures together genetically, in a population over time. God's Truth is the Truth in every way. God bless you
lol
and they came here in a space-submarine-ark. hahaha.
It's becoming a bad joke, you know.
Too bad the threat is on par with threatening that santa won't be bringing us gifts unless we act like nice little boys.
It seems your reading comprehension is massively failing you again.
It's not a threat but comes directly from Jesus and it's waiting for ANYone, especially those who offend little children with their evolutionist falsehoods.
They come out of the pit thinking they will be okay only to receive the harshest punishment of all.
I should have known that IF you and I agreed and I thanked you for it, it would make your credibility nil to other evolutionists. They might think you have converted. Amen?
What you mean to say is that all the possible genetic combinations already exist inside the genome and breeding and repeated backcrossing brings out one trait or another such as wolves to poodles.....It's called "repurposing of traits".
You might need the 3 things for function X, but the individual things might have a function in something else by themselves. Or be neutral and piggy back on other traits.
Irreducible complexity has been refuted so hard so many times already, it's like beating a dead horse. I'm amazed people still bring it up.
I think indoctrinating little children in extremist religion is not only offencive, it's abusive.
Ignoring the fact that cattle (Genesis 1:25, Genesis 6:20 & Genesis 7:14) and fowl (Genesis 6:20) are not eternal, whose kind is "her kind"? Leviticus 11:19 & Deuteronomy 14:18 "And the stork, the heron after her kind, and the lapwing, and the bat."There are only two kinds. Trinity kinds are eternal kinds and His kinds are temporary kinds which are subject to death. Want to know WHY God made two kinds?
Look at computers and see if by adding random bits to something you improve it, add functionality, discard errors, and perfect it.
What you mean to say is that all the possible genetic combinations already exist inside the genome and breeding and repeated backcrossing brings out one trait or another such as wolves to poodles..
duplications will not help since they are only a duplication of existing parts. so its not a new complex system. think about this: can you mix several parts in a car to add it a gps sytem for instance?Evolution isn't a teleological process. It randomly modifies what already exists and keeps whatever allows survival & reproduction.
However, it can produce complexity by the addition of new features that are modifications of existing features. Mutations in the regulatory areas of the genome can produce duplications of existing features, for example, a body segment with its pair of legs, e.g. in an arthropod or insect, supplying duplicate features for evolution to act on. Sometimes such duplications retain the original functions, e.g. multiple leg segments of centipedes, millipedes; and sometimes they are modified by evolution, providing novel functions, e.g. grasping forelimbs.
You can actually do that.
There is an entire subset of computing known as evolutionary computing, which uses evolutionary algorithms to produce improvements.
Evolutionary computing can also be used to simulate evolutionary models and outcomes. It's a very useful tool.
Ignoring the fact that cattle (Genesis 1:25, Genesis 6:20 & Genesis 7:14) and fowl (Genesis 6:20) are not eternal, whose kind is "her kind"? Leviticus 11:19 & Deuteronomy 14:18 "And the stork, the heron after her kind, and the lapwing, and the bat."
Queue the usual handwaving and denial.
Lol. You chose an English translation which, by definition, has been "altered" to agree with a religionist view.Not so, since I use the KJV of Scripture because many (like yours) have been "altered" or changed so that they will agree with random religionist views. So go find you a KJV or you will continue to be led astray. God bless you
Lol. You chose an English translation which, by definition, has been "altered" to agree with a religionist view.
What about the rest of my post? Are you just going to ignore that difficult question?Says the Agnostic to the Christian. I use the KJV because it is the most read of any other version and I can see God getting His message out to the largest number of people with the KJV. It's the way He does things. It's your right to read any version you like, and remain an agnostic, until the very end. God is Love and doesn't force anyone to live forever with Him in paradise. It's your free choice.
What about the rest of my post? Are you just going to ignore that difficult question?
And yet every time I give you a direct quote from the KJV you ignore it. How dishonest are you?Of course not IF you change to the less altered KJV, which God has put in front of more eyes than any other. It doesn't say the same thing your "obviously altered" version says. I know because I often post a direct link to the KJV because just typing in the chapter and verse on this board does NOT do that.
Leviticus 11:19 & Deuteronomy 14:18 "And the stork, the heron after her kind, and the lapwing, and the bat."
Ignoring the fact that cattle (Genesis 1:25, Genesis 6:20 & Genesis 7:14) and fowl (Genesis 6:20) are not eternal, whose kind is "her kind"?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?