Is the "March of Dimes" a religious group? AAA? USBC (United States Bowling Congress, I'm a bowler)?
What entity? Evidence please.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
A religious is to further the cause of a group.
I only want to further the cause of 1 entity who loves you.
Then virtually every single group is a religion. Congratulations on rendering the word useless.
As Chalnoth said, all we see is a group of people claiming that this loving entity exists. We also see Muslims, Hindus, and, yes, Wiccans. What makes yours any different?
Is the "March of Dimes" a religious group? AAA? USBC (United States Bowling Congress, I'm a bowler)?
What entity? Evidence please.
My God has accurately predicted world events 1000's of years in advance.
I challenge you to demonstrate that any prophecy in the Bible that has been truely fulfilled. Bear in mind that self-fulfilling prophecies and so-vague-they-could-mean-anything prophecies don't count, for obvious reasons. Nor do links to websites; I can do that myself.Accurate predictions of world events 1000's of years in advance is not enough evidence for you??
So, what, you predict that groups of Arabs will attack other groups of Arabs? Because that's been happening for millenia. Your predictions may come true, but not because of some supernatural power.I will tell you some near future events because of my knowlege of the Bible.
Israel is gonna be attacked by a coalition of Arab Nations in the next 2 years. They will be beaten but will kill so many Israelis the bodies will take months to bury.
Iran will be turned to Rubble for the most part in this small war.
And Israel will occupy most of Lebanon after it is over.
Accurate predictions of world events 1000's of years in advance is not enough evidence for you??
I challenge you to demonstrate that any prophecy in the Bible that has been truely fulfilled. Bear in mind that self-fulfilling prophecies and so-vague-they-could-mean-anything prophecies don't count, for obvious reasons. Nor do links to websites; I can do that myself.
My prediction? That you can't.
I also bet that my request will be seconded by every other non-Christian (and even some Christians) on this board.
As an aside, what do you say to the failed Biblical prophecies? The Jewish Messiah being named Jesus instead of Immanuel, for example.
Where does it say he would be named Immanuel??His name actually in the original language was Yeshua.
The greeks call the name Yehusas
Yehusas translated to english became Jesus.
Name translations do not change what the Bible says.
What about the logical contradictions in the Bible? The contradicting stories about the woman/women going to Jesus' (empty) tomb, for example.
What contradiction Chapter and verse please
Also, technically, a prophecy in the Bible that truely came true would only be evidence of the paranormal abilities of the prophet. That the Judaeo-Christo-Muslim God is the source of the prophecy would still be unevidenced.
OK
So, what, you predict that groups of Arabs will attack other groups of Arabs? Because that's been happening for millenia. Your predictions may come true, but not because of some supernatural power.
OK see signature.
2 Timothy 2 : 23Don't have anything to do with foolish and stupid arguments, because you know they produce quarrels. 24And the Lord's servant must not quarrel; instead, he must be kind to everyone, able to teach, not resentful. 25Those who oppose him he must gently instruct, in the hope that God will grant them repentance leading them to a knowledge of the truth, 26and that they will come to their senses and escape from the trap of the devil, who has taken them captive to do his will.
What does this have to do with any of my post?
Yes, I thought I recognised the reference to his sig from somewhere.Useful get out clause when he has lost an argument.
Just claims that it is Christian forbearance that stops him/her from cleaning your clock.
It has happened on a number of threads now
To add to the uniqueness of the platypus, studies of its mtDNA forced evolutionists to give upon mtDNA to 'prove' evolution. The studies showed that it was closer to eutherian mammals (cows, men, etc.) than the marsupials (kangaroos, koalas).
I've always thought of the platypus as a great example of a transition species between reptiles and mammals.A creationist plagiarizing? I am SHOCKED!
Of course, as others have mentioned, this is just plain stupid. Platypus are not marsupials, which are mammals by the way, so there is not an issue at all.
If I were you, I would be upset that my handlers are so quick to lie to me.
Glad you recognized your error. Now perhaps you will stop plagiarizing and engaging in unthinking reguritation of creationist nonsense.
One side says our understanding of DNA proves Evolution.
The other newer studies say DNA disproves evolution.
one side says the earth is flat, the other side says its round. Both claim science is in their favor. having two sides does not mean both sides are equally representational or accurate. Theirs more to having an equal argument then having a side.
Agreed
in the June 1 is­sue of The As­t­ro­phys­i­cal Jour­nal. This time re­search­ers us­ing NASAs Hub­ble Space Tel­e­scope said they found a huge, ghostly ring of dark mat­ter in a gal­axy clus­ter called Cl 0024+17, five bil­lion light-years from Earth, again thanks to a col­li­sion. NASA billed the find­ing as some of the strongest ev­i­dence yet for dark mat­ter.
Yet prob­lems keep crop­ping up, Mc­Gaugh wrote. A study in the May 10 is­sue of Sci­ence found that the bi­zarre gravita­t­ional ef­fects at­trib­ut­ed to dark mat­ter were show­ing up even where they werent ex­pected to un­der dark mat­ter the­o­ry it­self. Mod­i­fied gra­vity the­o­ryac­cord­ing to which gra­vity is stronger on in­ter­ga­lac­tic scales than the stand­ard laws of gra­vity sug­gestex­plained the puz­zle neat­ly, he wrote.
Science has it sooo together...LOL
That was incoherent. Can you clean it up and provide the source?Agreed
in the June 1 is­sue of The As­t­ro­phys­i­cal Jour­nal. This time re­search­ers us­ing NASAs Hub­ble Space Tel­e­scope said they found a huge, ghostly ring of dark mat­ter in a gal­axy clus­ter called Cl 0024+17, five bil­lion light-years from Earth, again thanks to a col­li­sion. NASA billed the find­ing as some of the strongest ev­i­dence yet for dark mat­ter.
Yet prob­lems keep crop­ping up, Mc­Gaugh wrote. A study in the May 10 is­sue of Sci­ence found that the bi­zarre gravita­t­ional ef­fects at­trib­ut­ed to dark mat­ter were show­ing up even where they werent ex­pected to un­der dark mat­ter the­o­ry it­self. Mod­i­fied gra­vity the­o­ryac­cord­ing to which gra­vity is stronger on in­ter­ga­lac­tic scales than the stand­ard laws of gra­vity sug­gestex­plained the puz­zle neat­ly, he wrote.
Science has it sooo together...LOL
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?