Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
You may use as many sources as you wish, Ragarth --- I choose to use one Source --- and a Source that says it was witnessed by many people.You also totally ignored the rest of my statement about using multiple sources to corroborate evidence.
I'm sure you'll agree with me that the Bible's veracity is not the subject of this thread.Unless you're going to make the disengenious claim that there's a massive world wide conspiracy about the depth of the mariana trench, which I highly doubt, then getting similar answers numerous times over the years using various methods of gauging the depth of the mariana trench is more reliable than a single book after multiple translation that's lacking in objective detail and accuracy and without citation.
Go figure --- that's science for you --- today's news is tomorrow's shred pile.Oh yes, and it's interesting that you chose the mariana trench as your example. Did you know that since the first measurement in 1951, we've gotten several different depths? This is due to variations in methods as well as it's bottom not being perfect. So it's actually wise to check multiple sources on this topic, because you will get several different answers.
You may use as many sources as you wish, Ragarth --- I choose to use one Source --- and a Source that says it was witnessed by many people.I'm sure you'll agree with me that the Bible's veracity is not the subject of this thread.
There's one major thing that keeps God's Word from being circular, and that's the nation of Israel --- but you guys' won't recognize the prophecies concerning Israel and, in so doing, set up your own blind spot.Your choice, but I do feel obligated to point out this stated circular logic:
"I choose one source --- and a source that says it was witnessed by many people."
In other words, you believe something because it says it's believable.
When you can build a machine that can do this ------ then we'll have something to talk about.
I don't doubt it.are you kidding. they have lsd for that.
and a Source that says it was witnessed by many people.I'm sure you'll agree with me that the Bible's veracity is not the subject of this thread.
I don't doubt it.
Let's not drag this into this thread, okay?too bad these many people all contradict each other.
why are their so many inconsistencies between Mathew Mark Luke and John? Like how they keep adding more and more each time the next one tells the story? was Their an angel in Jesus tomb or was it empty?
maybe they should have collaborated their "story'
Go figure --- that's science for you --- today's news is tomorrow's shred pile.
And for the point you just made --- I like to use the Periodic Table of the Elements for that.
Let's not drag this into this thread, okay?
The Periodic Table has been changed umpteen times, and that doesn't bother you guys one bit, because it's done in the name of "improvement".
You see what you think are changes in the Bible, and you have bug fits.
So I'm really not interested in your double standards.
No --- was the Periodic Table?Was the Bible designed (CREVO Term!) so that new elements could be added once they had been found in nature or created in a lab??
Let's not drag this into this thread, okay?
The Periodic Table has been changed umpteen times, and that doesn't bother you guys one bit, because it's done in the name of "improvement".
You see what you think are changes in the Bible, and you have bug fits.
So I'm really not interested in your double standards.
Time needed to make oil is different from the age of the source rock. You should not mix the two.
Oil made in formation as young as Pleistocene is possible.
6 Shots: Every time AVET claims to eat "someone" for breakfastYou just love repeating your incorrect notions over and over again. The funniest thing about that is that you blame us for forcing you to repeat yourself!
I cannot beleive I forgot the Periodic Table! In honor of you bringing it up again, I have revised the Drinking Game. It is a little more user friendly now.
The New and Revised AVET Drinking Game:
1 Shot: Every time AVET mentions The Space Shuttle disaster or Thalidomide.
2 Shots:: Every time AVET mentions the Periodic Table, or the Marianas Trench.
3 Shots: Every time AVET mentions his Apple Challenge
4 Shots: Every time AVET mentions Pluto.
5 Shots: Every time AVET claims to have "pwned" some one else
Let's not drag this into this thread, okay?
The Periodic Table has been changed umpteen times, and that doesn't bother you guys one bit, because it's done in the name of "improvement".
You see what you think are changes in the Bible, and you have bug fits.
So I'm really not interested in your double standards.
When you can build a machine that can do this ------ then we'll have something to talk about.
If you don't --- and you go through life believing it is 6.8 miles deep because others have confirmed it --- do you mind if I do the same thing with believing Jesus walked on water?
Let's not drag this into this thread, okay?
The Periodic Table has been changed umpteen times, and that doesn't bother you guys one bit, because it's done in the name of "improvement".
You see what you think are changes in the Bible, and you have bug fits.
So I'm really not interested in your double standards.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?