Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Now you are inferring I am stupid? Is that part of your superior sensitivity to the Holy Spirit? Grow up.you quoted it in your previous reply, how hard could it be?
Now you are inferring I am stupid? Is that part of your superior sensitivity to the Holy Spirit? Grow up.
Is this the question you are referring to?Now you guys, claim you have a relationship with God. If you really do, why have you not sensed the Holy Spirit in some of the answers opposing this question?
So, your answer would be, "No." ?
If there was no afterlife, you would not be a Christian? You would pursue self interests (with no concern for others) since you were not threatened with hell in the afterlife?
Imagine if humankind fell and the main point was to be reconciled to God in this lifetime. That you could have a full life with a reconciled relationship with your creator. And at the end of your life you could pass from this life knowing that your life meant something.
On the contrary most who are rejecting the question of this thread is seeing this as something like "would you continue doing moral Christian things without having a spiritual relationship with a spiritual Christ?". To which of course we said no. To us, spiritual connection and relationship with a spiritual being is everything. Doing "christianee" moral things is dead dry works that has no benefit even on this life. So we say "nada".
The real problem as we keep pointing out, is the question is badly made and just doesn't make sense in a spiritual perspective. If the driving question behind all of this was about relationship with God, then why wasn't the question framed plainly as that?
So no, my relationship with the Lord Jesus Christ, the Father in Heaven and the Holy Spirit, is sky high right now and is the most important thing to me. More important than life itself.
How about you, do you? If so, then we are all in the same boat in this thread. But this thread is dividing us all who love God by how ill thought out the question was framed, compounded by then changing it in the middle of the discussion. Most are now getting turned off by the persistence of some trying to create a divisive argument where there is none. We all love God, it is all about relationship with Him for most of us. Please let us all stop this exercise in futility. As I said before, I was heading out of this thread. But this statement about making this thread about our relationship with God who we treasure above all is the worse and deeply hurting. I could not go without addressing it first. Again please stop. This is displeasing the Spirit. There is no need to feel superior to others just because you think you have a relationship with Him while others are still struggling to grasp what Christianity is all about.
But then perhaps this is another spiritual attack, and you guys and this thread are allowing yourself to be used by the enemy to create further division? If so please check your hearts and see what are really your motives.
I'm trying to help you to process the question. Let's make it a real dilemma.That's a "false dilemma" fallacy. The choice has never been "Jesus versus "pursuit of self-interests with no concern for others."
Even today, if you approach atheists who live lives as "good people," they will smell the fallacy of that argument immediately.
I'm trying to help you to process the question. Let's make it a real dilemma.
Would you choose to be a Christian if there was no threat of hell in the afterlife?
I decided to reword this.
The Old Testament has very little to say about what happens in the afterlife. Yet throughout the OT many worshipped and served God, even to the point of execution. So hypothetically speaking if heaven and hell were put aside, would you still follow Jesus?
Answers could be something like "no way, I'm just in this because I don't want to fry" or "yes I would continue to follow Jesus no matter what" to "as long as the church serves coffee and doughnuts, I'm in"
Is this the question you are referring to?
You seem to be assuming that the Holy Spirit was speaking through the opinions of one side of this discussion among believers and not on the other side of the discussion. Thus claiming spiritual superiority on one side of the discussion.
Furthermore, it's a loaded question. What are my answer options according to you?
1) Yes, we sensed the Holy Spirit in some of the answers opposing this question, but chose to ignore it preferring our demonic opinions instead.
- OR -
2) No, we did not sense the Holy Spirit in some of the answers opposing this question, because we have no sensitivity to the leading of the Holy Spirit. (since we aren't believers)
That is what you are asking.
And you thought the OP question was evil? Wow.
But wouldn't this mean that if there was no afterlife ("the promise of eternal communion with Him") that you would choose to not be a Christian? And... doesn't this also mean that you see no value in being a Christian in this lifetime. (before an afterlife) That cannot be what you mean to say, but they are your words. What am I missing here?I would be a Christian (rather than merely a "good person" of any other stripe) because of the promise of eternal communion with Him, which being a "good person" of any other stripe does not provide.
Seriously?I assumed no such thing. I just wanted to see if you were reading with an open mind and a sensitivity to the Holy Spirit on both sides, since you are already convinced of your side.
Yes, it is a loaded question. It was meant to check your heart and motive. Your answers reveal what is inside of you. And I think it is fair to ask, because i have tried to answer almost all of your questions while asking none but this 1 only question in return.
The heart is deceitful above all, agree?
So who knows what is the motive of the OP in asking the question, or of you who persist to push it.
What we do know, is the fruit reflects the tree. And this thread has been very divisive.
But thank you for finally answering my question. I wanted to see where your heart is not only for me but also for you. God bless... now i'm truly outta here.
So who knows what is the motive of the OP in asking the question
Okay, thanks.
Which of these three doctrines of the final judgment best describes your position on the afterlife?
1) Damnationism
2) Annihilationism
3) Universal Restorationism
There is no such thing as a “realm of the dead”. That is an English word used by the NIV translators for Sheol.They could in the realm of the dead. Lots of strange goings on if you read ALL those passages. The trees of Eden ended up there as well.
The OP creates a situation where there is no afterlife. So, in that scenario, Jesus would not speak about it as if it did exist.
Would you be a Christian if there was no afterlife?
Let me rephrase the question for you.
Would you choose to be a Christian if there were no consequences for your actions in the afterlife? (this assumes there is an afterlife, but with no judgment, or punishment for wrongdoing)
I was replying to the title of the thread, which is;
If there had never been an after life then Jesus would not have said that there is, so his teaching would have been of a very different nature if, indeed, he had needed to come at all. Would he have been able to tell people to repent, to love God with all their soul, to talk about his return, the final judgement, heaven, hell, eternal life etc etc if there was no after life and we all face oblivion/extinction after death?
Wouldn't his message have been just along the lines of "it is a good idea to do good deeds and treat others well"? And some people might ask "why?" "Why shouldn't I steal, take what I want and live just for myself? This life is all that there is, and I want to be rich/comfortable while I'm here."
.
All three doctrinal views of the final judgment have biblical support, but none of them agree with each other.I hold to what the Bible describes of the fate of the unrepentant wicked who die:
Sheol is the realm of the dead.There is no such thing as a “realm of the dead”. That is an English word used by the NIV translators for Sheol.
Trees don’t sing in Sheol. If there are “trees” in Sheol, it is because they are not literal trees.
thus, Isaiah 14 is not all literal, nor is Isaiah 14:9 a proof text of an afterlife.
I decided to reword this.
The Old Testament has very little to say about what happens in the afterlife. Yet throughout the OT many worshipped and served God, even to the point of execution. So hypothetically speaking if heaven and hell were put aside, would you still follow Jesus?
Answers could be something like "no way, I'm just in this because I don't want to fry" or "yes I would continue to follow Jesus no matter what" to "as long as the church serves coffee and doughnuts, I'm in"
That’s not a phrase the writers of the OT used, just the NIV translators.Sheol is the realm of the dead.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?