• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Swag365

Well-Known Member
Dec 25, 2019
1,352
481
USA
✟65,429.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
As opposed to...what?
As opposed to faith and the prompting of the Holy Spirit. Do you believe that these played any role in your choice to become an Anglican, or do you think your choice was purely a matter of reason?

No, you have referred to your personal, unsubstantiated opinion of what the Catholic Church teaches. I posted precisely what She has taught.

Everyone has an opinion but unless you substantiate it with evidence it is to be rejected. Otherwise, I could assert anything I want about your church or any other church. I could say "Well, the Anglican Church really teaches that infant baptism is improper although Her official teaching "carefully manipulates" the explanation to make it appear that infant baptism is proper." If I wrote such a thing you would say that is ridiculous, where is you proof?

But that is precisely what you have done, and it is to be rejected.

Have a nice day.

 
Upvote 0

packermann

Junior Member
Nov 30, 2003
1,446
375
72
Northwest Suburbs of Chicago, IL
✟53,345.00
Faith
Catholic
Politics
US-Republican
But this verse--the very word of God--says that what is there is sufficient.

The most you can say is that the Gospel of John is sufficient, which means the rest of the Bible is superfluous.

Unless there is some other verse somewhere that denies it, we do not need to check off every other book and every other verse in the Bible! This one gives us the meaning.

Your argument is invalid for two reasons. First of all, it is unreasonable to require me to prove a negative. Sola scriptura was started in the Reformation - about 1500 year after that the books of the Bible was written. It is highly unlikely that the Bible writers would write about an issue that did not come up until 1500 years later! There are many things that we believe that is not in the Bible. We believe that polygamy is wrong, but there is not one verse in the Bible that says it is a sin (there is a verse that says that a bishop should be the husband of one wife, but that does not mean that one who is not a bishop must be monogamous). Also, there is no verse in the Bible that says we cannot own slaves. Do you believe that slavery is OK since it is not forbidden in the Bible?

Also, it assumes what you are seeking to prove. You assume sola scriptura to be true that as your basis to prove that sola scriptura is true. Since I do not believe in sola scripture, I do not need a scripture verse in the Bible to believe that sola scriptura to be false. But you need to provide a verse that positively asserts sola scripture - because if you cannot provide a scripture verse to prove that all that we believe must be in the Bible then your belief in that we believe must be in the Bible must be false. So if you are right then you would be wrong.

However, even though I do not need to have a passage that denies sola scripture, there are verses to indicate that the Bible writers assumed that our source for spiritual truth is not limited to what was written. Here is one of them.

So then, brothers and sisters, stand firm and hold fast to the teachings we passed on to you, whether by word of mouth or by letter.
1 Thessalonians 2:15

Paul is telling them to hold to teachings, whether it was written or spoken. If they were holding fast to his oral teachings, that means that they were passing it on from generation to generation.

Actually, the word for "teachings" in the above verse is in Greek is παραδόσεις, which means "tradition". So Paul is saying that we should hold on to the oral traditions and the written traditions from Paul.

If you do not believe me that the word actually mean tradition, see the non-Catholic web site the Bible Hub (the link is right below)

2 Thessalonians 2:15 Interlinear: so, then, brethren, stand ye fast, and hold the deliverances that ye were taught, whether through word, whether through our letter;

I can never understand why sola scriptura Christians do not learn Hebrew and Greek. Those languages should be required in every Protestant Bible-only Church Sunday School. The ignorance of Hebrew and Greek just shows to me that no sola scriptura Christian actually believes in sola scriptura. Remember, no English translation of the Bible is the Word of God - only the originals documents are, and the originals were written in Hebrew and Greek.
 
Upvote 0

JAL

Veteran
Site Supporter
Oct 16, 2004
10,778
928
Visit site
✟343,550.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Why is Sola Scriptura a false doctrine?

I look to the Early Fathers for some guidance at times.
But they always agree with scripture so I have no problem.
I'm no Catholic but I appreciate the Catholic contributions on this thread. They have supplied several rebuttals to Sola Scriptura that I myself hadn't thought of.
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,262
✟583,992.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
As opposed to faith and the prompting of the Holy Spirit. Do you believe that these played any role in your choice to become an Anglican, or do you think your choice was purely a matter of reason?
No, I wouldn't say it was "purely" a matter of reason.

No, you have referred to your personal, unsubstantiated opinion of what the Catholic Church teaches.
I assure you that it's not that. It is based upon a lot of study, more that you realize. And so it is "substantiated."
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,262
✟583,992.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
The most you can say is that the Gospel of John is sufficient, which means the rest of the Bible is superfluous.


I agree that we can read those verses to say what you did--that what is written there, in John, is given so that we may know that Jesus is the Savior, etc.

However, what these verses are saying is that this IS sufficient.

That information is the heart of the Gospel's message. That is what leads to salvation. Since revealing that is the purpose of Scripture, it is not simply one more commandment, one more assurance of God's love, one more description of Jesus' doings on Earth, etc. etc., as valuable as those other revelations may be.
 
Upvote 0

Swag365

Well-Known Member
Dec 25, 2019
1,352
481
USA
✟65,429.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
I assure you that it's not that. It is based upon a lot of study, more that you realize. And so it is "substantiated."
Plenty of people study all sorts of things for vast amounts of time, and remain in error. You'll have to forgive me if I don't find your assurance very reassuring.
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,262
✟583,992.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Plenty of people study all sorts of things for vast amounts of time, and remain in error. You'll have to forgive me if I don't find your assurance very reassuring.
I really don't care what you choose to believe, especially since you have nothing on which to make a decision about this.

But the claim was that my knowledge is simply this: "No, you have referred to your personal, unsubstantiated opinion...."

In addition to such a comment being highly presumptuous, and insulting, it is also ignorant. It suggests, in addition, that when I explain that I have come to my convictions after quite a lot of study, that is simply rejected out of hand on the basis of nothing whatsoever.
 
Upvote 0

Swag365

Well-Known Member
Dec 25, 2019
1,352
481
USA
✟65,429.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Friend, what definition of "substantiate" are you using? Let me provide you with a definition:

SUBSTANTIATE | meaning in the Cambridge English Dictionary
Substantiate: to show something to be true, or to support a claim with facts.

Now, with respect to the issue we were discussing, you did not show what you wrote to be true, nor did you support your claim with facts.

Therefore, your claim is unsubstantiated.

Have a nice day.
 
Upvote 0

Albion

Facilitator
Dec 8, 2004
111,127
33,262
✟583,992.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Anglican
Marital Status
Married
Now, with respect to the issue we were discussing, you did not show what you wrote to be true, nor did you support your claim with facts.

Therefore, your claim is unsubstantiated.
You missed the point that it is not right and not called for to simply ASSUME, and then CLAIM, without any basis, that what the other person reported about his background. training, education, etc. is false.

That's what was done.

No amount of talking around this fact will change it. And that is what you are attempting to do.
 
Upvote 0

Swag365

Well-Known Member
Dec 25, 2019
1,352
481
USA
✟65,429.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
I did not make any claims about your background, training, or education.

Nor is your background, training, or education particularly relevant to me. But for the sake of argument, I will concede that you have a very fine background, that your training is top notch, and that you have received the best education.

That doesn't change the fact that what you wrote is unsubstantiated, and that I reject it because it is unsubstantiated.

Have a nice day.

P.S. To clarify what I wrote previously, I am not reassured by the fact that you or anyone else may have studied a particular subject in great depth. Plenty of people who have done that remain in error. So the fact that you have done that, as you claim, is no reassurance to me that what you wrote has any validity.
 
Upvote 0

Swag365

Well-Known Member
Dec 25, 2019
1,352
481
USA
✟65,429.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
Look. Just let it go. It wasn't even the correct incident/exchange when you complained about "substantiated."
I need to let go of what exactly?

I am not the person in this thread taking personal offense at non-existent accusations concerning his background. If anyone needs to let something go I would think that it would be him.

Have a nice day.
 
Upvote 0

YouAreAwesome

☝✌
Oct 17, 2016
2,181
969
Lismore, Australia
✟102,053.00
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married

Well obviously we disagree on nearly everything to do with the Mosaic Law, and therefore the Sabbath ceremony. But sticking to this topic derails the thread so I'll leave it at that.

I'm bowing out again, peace.
 
Upvote 0

LoveGodsWord

Well-Known Member
Jun 5, 2017
22,242
6,636
Queensland
Visit site
✟252,349.00
Country
Australia
Faith
SDA
Marital Status
Married
Well obviously we disagree on nearly everything to do with the Mosaic Law, and therefore the Sabbath ceremony. But sticking to this topic derails the thread so I'll leave it at that.

I'm bowing out again, peace.

I did not think you would respond to post 118 linked as it shows why your claims are not true. Anyhow, If your interested go to the Sabbath and law forum. I believe only God's Word is true and we should believe and follow it over the teachings and traditions of men that seek to break the commandments of God *ROMANS 3:4; MATTHEW 15:2-9. Thanks for sharing.
 
Last edited:
Upvote 0

GodsGrace101

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 17, 2018
6,713
2,297
Tuscany
✟255,207.00
Country
Italy
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I'm sorry, I don't understand your entire post.

I'm not sure what you think I believe.

The Ceremonial Laws have to do with the traditions of Israel's worship practices. For instance, there's a lot of this in Leviticus where it explains how to make a sacrifice.

Can we make sacrifices today?
No. So the Ceremonial Laws are abolished.

The Civil Laws taught how to live life in a general sense. Deuteronomy speaks to this....this is where Moses declares that a certificate of divorce must be given.

Can we live by the same standards of that time?
No. So the Civil Laws are abolished.

The Moral Law,,, which is the 10 Commandments is still in effect today....the moral law will never change because God gave these commands as He is a Moral Being.

Hope this clears up some issues.
 
Reactions: LoveGodsWord
Upvote 0

GodsGrace101

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 17, 2018
6,713
2,297
Tuscany
✟255,207.00
Country
Italy
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
For starters post 28 has a 10-point rebuttal, which LoveGodsWord challenged on this thread, with my follow-up responses at post 107 and post 109.
JAL
If you can't tell me in 25 words or less why you think Sola Scriptura is a false doctrine,,,then I'd say you maybe just can't explain it simply.

Which is all it would take.

How could Sola Scriptura be a false doctrine?
I understand how some might add info to it...
but you think it's FALSE??!!

No 10-point rebuttals for me.
Sorry....you don't have to answer if you don't want to.
But sending a person to a prior post is not really what these threads are here for.

No problem.
 
Reactions: LoveGodsWord
Upvote 0

GodsGrace101

Well-Known Member
Site Supporter
Apr 17, 2018
6,713
2,297
Tuscany
✟255,207.00
Country
Italy
Gender
Female
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Married
I'm no Catholic but I appreciate the Catholic contributions on this thread. They have supplied several rebuttals to Sola Scriptura that I myself hadn't thought of.
Catholics are not so bad.
They just have some doctrine wrong...IMHO.
And it's too bad,,,because many of their teachings are
right on.

So like what, for instance?
What rebuttals to sola scriptura that you hadn't thought of?

You gonna send me to a previous post???
 
Reactions: LoveGodsWord
Upvote 0

JAL

Veteran
Site Supporter
Oct 16, 2004
10,778
928
Visit site
✟343,550.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
You didn't have to read all 10. One would have been a good start.
 
Upvote 0

Swag365

Well-Known Member
Dec 25, 2019
1,352
481
USA
✟65,429.00
Country
United States
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Single
JAL
If you can't tell me in 25 words or less why you think Sola Scriptura is a false doctrine,,,then I'd say you maybe just can't explain it simply.

Which is all it would take.
The doctrine holds that all binding beliefs must be found in Sacred Scripture, but the doctrine itself is not found in Sacred Scripture. The doctrine refutes itself.

Moreover, Sacred Scripture itself contradicts the doctrine (see, e.g. 2 Thess 2:15).
 
Upvote 0