Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
No. And it would be irrelevant for the discussion at hand, anyway.You are either a metaphysical naturalist or you are a metaphysical supernaturalist.
Davian, Davian, Davian......
How long shall I bear with thee...
I said the one who maintains his life is meaningful whilst denying God is engaging in self-delusion....
Not.....
That the one who denies God's existence due to lack of evidence is self-delusional.
No. And it would be irrelevant for the discussion at hand, anyway.
So much for arguments based on assumptions.
Atheists just don´t believe in god(s).
Could you now get back to substantiating your empty assertions about atheists (or retract them), please?
Why does someone need a god to find meaning in their own life? I'd say a god is completely irrelevant in that regard.
Do you believe in God?
Which God are you referring to? I have not yet been presented with a concept of God that's met it's burden of proof. So, I don't currently believe a God exists, but am open to the idea if it can be demonstrated.
Do you have any evidence to suggest a god actually exists?
It is not my intent to speak about evidence for God. I just wanted to know if you believe God existed.
On to the next question:
Are you a metaphysical naturalist?
Ah, that´s what you meant by "closed system". Of course, if you believe in anything beyond natural processes acting on matter you likewise believe that you are in closed system - consisting of the physical/natural and whatever else you happen to believe in.If you are a metaphysical naturalist, you believe that the cosmos is all there is and all there ever will be a la Carl Sagan. i.e. a closed system.
If you believe that all that exists can be explained via natural processes acting on matter then you are a metaphysical naturalist.
Oh man, when these insinuations and appeals to emotions start I already know you have no point.I know you may not admit to this if you are. You may be one of the ones who shrinks from bearing any type of burden when it comes to defending your views.
That is your prerogative.
If by that you mean I believe the natural world is all that exists, then yes.
I don't. One might believe that the cosmos is all there was all there is and all there ever will be, but that has is knowledge that may not be accessible.Excellent. Indeed most atheists are metaphysical naturalists.
That is just a fancy way of saying that the cosmos is all there was all there is and all there ever will be.
Carl Sagan made this idea more well known when he coined the phrase not exactly as I have it here but close.
On such a view, the cosmos is all that there is. There is nothing supernatural or transcendent that exists outside of the universe.
Follow me so far?
Excellent. Indeed most atheists are metaphysical naturalists.
That is just a fancy way of saying that the cosmos is all there was all there is and all there ever will be.
Carl Sagan made this idea more well known when he coined the phrase not exactly as I have it here but close.
On such a view, the cosmos is all that there is. There is nothing supernatural or transcendent that exists outside of the universe.
Follow me so far?
Looks like an attempt at a false dichotomy. If I "shrink" from defending my views, yours must be right.If you are a metaphysical naturalist, you believe that the cosmos is all there is and all there ever will be a la Carl Sagan. i.e. a closed system.
If you believe that all that exists can be explained via natural processes acting on matter then you are a metaphysical naturalist.
I know you may not admit to this if you are. You may be one of the ones who shrinks from bearing any type of burden when it comes to defending your views.
That is your prerogative.
Whether or not you think the ontological argument is silly is irrelevant to whether or not necessary existence is a great making property.
Of course you do not see it that way. *Stepping into the metaphysical naturalism shoes I have sitting here on the carpet, I shall now speak*:
Your physiology is slightly different than mine. The computations and biological processes taking place in your brain cause you to see things slightly different than I do. But your thoughts, like mine, are simply by-products of evolutionary processes. We both think life meaningful, it just so happened that nature's processes have led me to believe meaning is derived from God while nature's processes have led you to believe meaning is derived from whatever you think it is. The truth is that we exist, like a snowflake if you will. While we appear to be designed and marvelously crafted by some great mind, in actuality, we, like the snowflake, just so happened to come to exist as a result of natural processes acting on matter over time, and like the snowflake melts and evaporates into the air, so we too shall die and cease to be very soon.
With my "red slippers still on*:
Yes I think that. You do not. However, the same biological processes that have made my thoughts what they are, are the same biological process that make your thoughts what they are. The only difference is in the way these processes interact with one another in your grey matter, thus producing slightly different thoughts.
Indeed. But, "with my naturalism slippers still on":
I am actually not a tool at all. Neither are you. We are like a piece of iron ore, or a grain of sand, or a roach. We exist as a by-product of natural processes. In order for me to actually be a tool, I would have had to be made by a person who had a specific purpose in mind when making me. But since my existence is owed to natural processes acting on matter, there was no person to make me for a specific purpose. So even though the processes and computations taking place in your grey matter cause you to think my views make me a tool, in reality, I am not. I am just like you and both of us are like a tree, or a daffodil.
Precisely, now you've got it!!!
*Slippers still on of course*
The arrangement of the matter is what makes you different than say, a slug. But this arrangement is the result of natural processes acting on matter. And this arrangement is of such a nature as to produce in you these things called "thoughts". Taking it one step further, theses thoughts also differ according to their arrangement. Some thoughts are arranged "meaning" wise, and some thoughts are arranged "love" wise, or "happy" wise or any other concept. So when you say something like: "My life is meaningful", your saying this is the result of a thought you have. And this thought you have is the result of a peculiar combination of processes and interactions in your grey matter that are produced purely by natural means. So the thought, "life is meaningful" is not actually based on anything other than said processes. You having the thought in question is akin to me farting, or burping. It is simply a manifestation of natural processes interacting with matter.
The same processes that lead nihilists to hold the views they do are the same processes that lead you to have the views you do. It is the arrangement and synchronization of these processes that differ.
I am taking my slippers off now.
What you have just said is in reality, fundamentally no different than you farting or blinking your eye. It is a manifestation or a "reflex" caused by the particular arrangement of molecules and atoms in combination with natural processes acting on said matter. In fact, if all of our thoughts and perceptions are simply the manifestations of certain particular combinations of natural processes acting on matter, how would we ever know if these thoughts and perceptions actually presented us with a true view of reality????
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?