• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Why is this taught in your churches?

Zecryphon

Well-Known Member
Aug 14, 2006
8,987
2,005
52
Phoenix, Arizona
✟19,186.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
isn't that commonly referred to as "cherry picking"?

i love the saying "God said it. I believe it. That settles it!!"


It is called cherry picking. But I don't know if the OP believes any of the Bible, that's why I asked the question about it. I love the saying "If the KJV was good enough for Jesus and His disciples, it's good enough for you!"
 
Upvote 0

jblake

Newbie
Jan 9, 2009
11
0
✟22,722.00
Faith
Christian
If you don't believe the creation account in the Bible, what parts of the Bible do you believe? None of it? Some of it?
That was my point. If you accept the Bible as true, then one has to believe that the Creation account is true, as a matter of faith and belief. Depending purely on reason, logic, and empirical evidence, one has to say "I don't know" in terms of either evolution, or Creation. What is claimed to be true depends on one's axioms --- the unproven and unprovable assumptions that one makes. The recognition of those assumptions, and one's willingness to accept that they are unproven and unprovable, is why one takes the results of those axioms on faith, and faith alone. If one only accepts that only part of the Bible is true, then what part, or parts are true? The parts that are comfortable? The parts that don't require one to admit to a belief system? Some other subset? Why are those parts true? Why are the other parts not true? In the end, it boils down to: "Do you _know_ what you believe?" and "Do you know why you believe what you think you believe?". Maybe one should also throw in: "Is what you think you believe, what you actually believe?"
 
Upvote 0

twin.spin

Trust the LORD and not on your own understanding
May 1, 2010
797
266
✟80,266.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Private

NASA installed large landing pads on the original landing craft because of the known factor of how much dust accumulates in space. The theory went that because the moon is billions of years old there should be approx 1 foot or more dust ..... what they discovered was less than 1".

Conclusion, either:
  1. the universe is younger than believed
  2. the formula for dust accumulating on surfaces is wrong
As far as I know, NASA hasn't changed the rotation rate of satellites ... dust hasn't changed accumulation speeds.

\\\\\\\\\\\\\\\ other interesting facts /////////////
F = ma
Force = (mass) times (acceleration)
a heavier object doesn't fall any faster or slower than a small object

Recently a fairly large meteor (approx the size of a full size bus) came within the earth (half the distance between the earth and moon). Despite the gravitational pulls of both the moon and earth, the meteor didn't become an orbiting satellite.

The significance of this is what force stopped the moon of it's accerlation to become an satellite of the earth.... if the earth couldn't stop a meteor?

Which the ultimate question is, what force stopped all the sun's accleration after the bang if that happened?
 
Upvote 0

Zecryphon

Well-Known Member
Aug 14, 2006
8,987
2,005
52
Phoenix, Arizona
✟19,186.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
The Bible is God's divine revelation to mankind. There is no reason to believe any part of it is a lie and I've seen plenty of atheists, agnostics, philosophers and other kinds of skeptics try to prove it false and fail. Now, I would like it very much if you would answer the question that has been put before you: which parts of the Bible are true? All of it, some of it or none of it?
 
Upvote 0

Lupinus

Senior Member
May 28, 2007
725
55
39
SC
✟16,223.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
Because the Bible tells us so.

God tells us the world was created in six days, therefor it was created in six days. Just because science tells us that is impossible doesn't mean a fig. Science is always wrong and constantly changing as it is based on what we as humans know in our limited understanding. The so called laws of science constantly change.

Plenty of the things in the bible are scientifically impossible. Creation of the world in six days, raising of the dead, parting of the red sea, mana from heaven, covering the world in a flood, etc.

Does this mean none of them happened? That they are impossible? If our limited human understanding will cause us to pick and choose does any of it really matter?
 
Upvote 0

Studeclunker

Senior Member
Dec 26, 2006
2,325
162
People's Socialist Soviet Republic Of California
✟25,816.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
Each religious order has something they base their belief system on. Weather it be the Koran, the writings of a particular leader (Confucus, Budda, etc), or the Holy Bible.

Whatever one bases their religion on must be the norm and foundation of that faith. Otherwise it's like the house built on sand that Christ mentions in his parable, "The wind blew and the waves beat upon it and great was its fall..." Thus will be the fall of the religion that doesn't remain faithful to it's source of faith.

Thus, if the Bible, in the books Moses recorded, says that the Lord created the world in six twenty-four hour days, then, since we have no other eye-whitness accounts, we as Lutherans accept the Lord's testamony as truthful. Since our belief system is based on his word (the Holy Bible) we have no other choice.

As to the Scientific community, they have nothing but theories as to the origins of the Earth and universe. Since all a theory amounts to is a guess, then I'd rather not base my faith on Science, thank you.
 
Upvote 0

seajoy

Senior Veteran
Jul 5, 2006
8,092
631
michigan
✟34,053.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
A question has been asked of the OP.....why hasn't he come back and answered it? I am curious to know his response.

Oops - the question was asked of a different poster - I need to read better. Anyway - it could be asked of the OP. What parts of the bible do you believe? Creation isn't a big stretch when looking at ressurection.
 
Upvote 0

lovernotafighter

Liberal :)
Sep 25, 2010
495
43
Minnesota
✟23,310.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others

All of it, of course! I've been looking into YEC theory. It seems like I never really gave it a chance. Let's prove it and shock the world!
 
Upvote 0

Studeclunker

Senior Member
Dec 26, 2006
2,325
162
People's Socialist Soviet Republic Of California
✟25,816.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
All of it, of course! I've been looking into YEC theory. It seems like I never really gave it a chance. Let's prove it and shock the world!

Shocking? Oh, indubidably! The proof will come riding in the clouds on a white horse and will be seen all over the world at once. It is also written, that those who don't presently believe and promote their 'scientific' theories and agendas, won't believe when confronted with the proof either. We already know the end of the story. Just when the story will end, that's the question.
 
Upvote 0

twin.spin

Trust the LORD and not on your own understanding
May 1, 2010
797
266
✟80,266.00
Country
United States
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Private

Love that answer
 
Upvote 0

PreachersWife2004

by his wounds we are healed
Site Supporter
May 15, 2007
38,620
4,181
51
Land O' 10,000 Lakes
✟106,590.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married

http://www.smallchurchmusic.com/Snippet/S-AtTheName-KWeston-PipeLC-48-CAM.mp3
 
Upvote 0

Aibrean

Honest. Maybe too Honest.
Mar 18, 2007
6,298
347
42
Xenia, Ohio
Visit site
✟30,899.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Yes...it can be possible to have a 6 day creation and an earth that appears old (as Tangible said). I actually came to that realization this year.

If everything was created without having been given the appearance of "old", Adam wouldn't have had anything to eat (they didn't eat meat before the fall) in the garden. How could birds be in the heavens if they were baby birds? Certainly even Adam wasn't created as a baby.


He put Adam in the garden before he put plants in there...so either the trees grew super-fast or they were created full grown.
 
Upvote 0

Aibrean

Honest. Maybe too Honest.
Mar 18, 2007
6,298
347
42
Xenia, Ohio
Visit site
✟30,899.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Plants were on the earth yes...not necessarily in the garden. At least that's the way I read this..

And the LORD God planted a garden in Eden, in the east, and there he put the man whom he had formed.

I read it chronologically (no plant on the earth had sprung up). Being a farmer, a plant does not grow if it hasn't been planted because it doesn't exist there. The verse above that one is

When no bush of the field was yet in the land and no small plant of the field had yet sprung up

Which means to me that the rest of the earth had already been planted before he "planted a garden in Eden". But, if I read the verse in order, God placed man in the garden before the plants (in the garden of Eden) "sprang up".
 
Upvote 0

DaRev

Well-Known Member
Apr 18, 2006
15,117
716
✟19,002.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married

But the verse says that He planted the garden and then placed the man there, which tells me that the plants were there first.
 
Upvote 0

PreachersWife2004

by his wounds we are healed
Site Supporter
May 15, 2007
38,620
4,181
51
Land O' 10,000 Lakes
✟106,590.00
Gender
Female
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Yes...but it was before they had sprung up (yes...ok...they we there but not visible). You know how long it takes an apple tree to bear fruit from a seedling?

I never really thought of creation in those terms.

I've always pictured it as God saying "here's an apple tree" and there's an apple tree.
 
Upvote 0

Studeclunker

Senior Member
Dec 26, 2006
2,325
162
People's Socialist Soviet Republic Of California
✟25,816.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Single
I come from an agrarian background too. Thus, I understand your viewpoint as to the origin of (plant) life. However, the question begs answer; did the chicken come first or the egg? Thus, did the tree come first or did the seed? If we believe that our Lord created the earth by just his word, the answer is given: the chicken and the tree.

Let's have a look at C.S. Lewis' view of what the creation may have been like:


Excerpt from The Magician's Nephew, by C.S. Lewis

What's to say that a being who can create things simply by the power of his voice couldn't do something quite similar? Lewis is presenting this as his theory, a shadow, of what creation might have been like. So, again the question's answers are: the Chicken and the Tree. Fully formed and mature.
 
Upvote 0

Zecryphon

Well-Known Member
Aug 14, 2006
8,987
2,005
52
Phoenix, Arizona
✟19,186.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
Yes...but it was before they had sprung up (yes...ok...they we there but not visible). You know how long it takes an apple tree to bear fruit from a seedling?

Just out of curiosity, how do you know that the plants had not sprung up when God created planted the garden?
 
Upvote 0

Aibrean

Honest. Maybe too Honest.
Mar 18, 2007
6,298
347
42
Xenia, Ohio
Visit site
✟30,899.00
Faith
Lutheran
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Constitution
The way I see it...
1. No plants yet have spring up
2. God creates man
3. God plants garden of EdenB
4. Got puts man in garden
5. All kinds of trees grow out of the ground.

Between 1 and 2...maybe from the streams coming up from the earth. Obviously between 2 and 3, man is going to have to need something to eat. So like I said...either they grow super fast or when he makes the garden the plants are full grown.
 
Upvote 0