PsychoSarah
Chaotic Neutral
It couldn't possibly be as bad as it seems. But being able to write that statement honestly is bad enough.
Upvote
0
Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
This site can do it to you.There there sweet pea, its not as bad as it seems.
It couldn't possibly be as bad as it seems. But being able to write that statement honestly is bad enough.
It's this site, I was already a pessimist to begin with, but I think I might be turning into a misanthrope.
Evolution before our very eyes???
Uh,,,,yours or mine?
what? No no, I meant you saying it isn't as bad as it seems, not your attempt to make me feel better. I can't seem to get through 1 conversation with you without a misunderstanding.
I was messing with you. You are fine.
Right I said I didn't see that it was your response when I saw the link. Sorry.
In a worldview that comes from a non-intelligent process without meaning or purpose there is no reason to believe that intelligence, meaning or purpose arise in that process. It is not cohesive with that worldview. To have that worldview, one must have an explanation for that to be a reality.
In the Christian worldview, it is cohesive for our intelligence to be from intelligence, to have meaning and purpose when that is what we come from.
For the slightest instant I thought there would be a cogent response....then...Since my position was incorrectly presented, let me interject and set the record straight.
At least Once isn't acting the part of Long John Silver's shoulder pet. Wake me when something important or, better yet, truthful is written by you.It's not my chosen definition of Darwinist creationism, it's precisely what Darwinist creationism teaches. I've given the definition of Darwinism probably a hundred times now and I've yet to have anyone to point out error in it. Once again, from Wikipedia....
"Darwinism is a theory of biological evolution developed by Charles Darwin and others, stating that all species of organisms arise and develop through the natural selection of small, inherited variations that increase the individual's ability to compete, survive, and reproduce. "
That's an inherently atheistic view of how humanity was created.
It is atheistic. Darwinist creationism, i.e., the explanation of how humanity was created is only, solely, totally, completely by naturalistic mechanisms. Nothing else is allowed. Everything else is discarded. Other views are dismissed. One and only one creationist view is permitted, the inherently atheistic Darwinist creationist view.
The question is concerning how the complex and variety of life we observe today was created. It was either theistic in some form or it was atheistic. Darwinist creationism demands that only one creationist view is allowed.
For the slightest instant I thought there would be a cogent response....then...
At least Once isn't acting the part of Long John Silver's shoulder pet. Wake me when something important or, better yet, truthful is written by you.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?