Why grape juice?

Question: Does anyone else here feel like they should *NOT* take communion?

Do you believe it was an ordinance given to the church? or more like a "decree"?? or is not meant to be "observed" today at all (neither grape juice or wine)?

@@Paul@@ said:

Question: Does anyone else here feel like they should *NOT* take communion?

Click to expand...

Er, I do, but probably not for the obvious reason. There's a passage saying that whoever takes communion unworthily, not discerning the flesh, eats and drinks damnation, or words to that effect. Not being sure what this means, I abstain.

seebs said:

Er, I do, but probably not for the obvious reason. There's a passage saying that whoever takes communion unworthily, not discerning the flesh, eats and drinks damnation, or words to that effect. Not being sure what this means, I abstain.

Click to expand...

Right,, it also says MANY are sick and SOME die (and it's not referring to bad grape juice)...

Mike, are you sure you're not a Quaker?

Click to expand...

Thanks, that made me smile

Do you believe it was an ordinance given to the church? or more like a "decree"?? or is not meant to be "observed" today at all (neither grape juice or wine)?

Click to expand...

I think we should do what the scripture tells us to do: remember. And in doing so we should be in the right spirit. We should have a short sin list by asking for forgivness and turn from the sin, lay it down at the cross and come to the table with a broken heart. But, it's not about me, it's about others, it's not about wine, or grape juice, it's about knowing that God wants me to be at that table and died on a cross to make it possible.

Crazy Liz said:

We actually don't know that for sure. According to John, Jesus was crucified just as the Passover lambs were being slaughtered, so that would mean the Last Supper took place on the night before the Passover began. OTOH, the synoptics indicate it was the night of Passover.

Also, the word used for "bread" everywhere in the NT (the gospels and 1 Corinthians, at least) is the Greek word for ordinary, or raised bread, not the Greek word for flat bread or matzos.

So, for these two reasons, there is some uncertainty as to whether the Last Supper actually was a Passover seder. If you'd like to understand the arguments against it being a Passover seder, I'm sure you could find somebody in TAW who could explain it to you better than I could. This is considered important by some Eastern Orthodox and Eastern Rite Catholics, while most Christians either assume it was a Passover seder or are content to leave the question unanswered. All I know is it's not 100% certain according to the Bible for these two reasons. I'm one of those who is content to leave the question unanswered, although I kind of like the idea of using raised bread for communion "because Christ has risen."

Click to expand...

It absolutely would have been not only Matzoh but a special type of Matzoh kosher for Passover. We know this because the room that they ate in had already been prepaired for the passover

Luk 22:7 Then came the day of Chag HaMatzah on which it was necessary for the Pesach to be sacrificed.
Luk 22:8 And He sent Petros and Yochanan, saying, "Go and prepare the Pesach for us, that we may eat it."


Part of the preperation was and still is the cleaning of all kushrach (leven) from the place where the passover meal would be eaten. Thus in no way would they have brought into the building leven (raised bread specifically)

IN fact it would have been a very special matzoh that was carefully prepaired so as to drive all mosture from it To do so renders this bread both Pierced and Striped.

If you look at the extremely Jewish part of this last supper the whole story really takes on a whole new significance.

I really urge all of you that ever have an opportunity to do so to attend a Messianic Seder you will learn A LOT!


Blessings

Pastor George (The Messianic Mennonite!)

Lets just get ONE thing strait here in this thread........
It was NOT the Last supper!! Christ ate after he arose. This is why many of us call it the Lord's supper, not the Last supper. Actually the term "last" supper, I have heard, came from the DiVincing painting.
GEL

GreenEyedLady said:

Lets just get ONE thing strait here in this thread........
It was NOT the Last supper!! Christ ate after he arose. This is why many of us call it the Lord's supper, not the Last supper. Actually the term "last" supper, I have heard, came from the DiVincing painting.
GEL

Click to expand...

:o I had to look and was surprised to find I was the one who said that. Must have been typing too fast!

Nehemiah_Center said:

It absolutely would have been not only Matzoh but a special type of Matzoh kosher for Passover. We know this because the room that they ate in had already been prepaired for the passover

Luk 22:7 Then came the day of Chag HaMatzah on which it was necessary for the Pesach to be sacrificed.
Luk 22:8 And He sent Petros and Yochanan, saying, "Go and prepare the Pesach for us, that we may eat it."


Part of the preperation was and still is the cleaning of all kushrach (leven) from the place where the passover meal would be eaten. Thus in no way would they have brought into the building leven (raised bread specifically)

IN fact it would have been a very special matzoh that was carefully prepaired so as to drive all mosture from it To do so renders this bread both Pierced and Striped.

If you look at the extremely Jewish part of this last supper the whole story really takes on a whole new significance.

I really urge all of you that ever have an opportunity to do so to attend a Messianic Seder you will learn A LOT!


Blessings

Pastor George (The Messianic Mennonite!)

Click to expand...

Awesome post Pastor George, as usual.

It is amazing how the events of the Scriptures come "alive" when you look at them from the perspective of 1st century Jew people, Jewish culture and Jewish tradition.

Nehemiah_Center said:

It absolutely would have been not only Matzoh but a special type of Matzoh kosher for Passover. We know this because the room that they ate in had already been prepaired for the passover

Luk 22:7 Then came the day of Chag HaMatzah on which it was necessary for the Pesach to be sacrificed.
Luk 22:8 And He sent Petros and Yochanan, saying, "Go and prepare the Pesach for us, that we may eat it."


Part of the preperation was and still is the cleaning of all kushrach (leven) from the place where the passover meal would be eaten. Thus in no way would they have brought into the building leven (raised bread specifically)

IN fact it would have been a very special matzoh that was carefully prepaired so as to drive all mosture from it To do so renders this bread both Pierced and Striped.

If you look at the extremely Jewish part of this last supper the whole story really takes on a whole new significance.

I really urge all of you that ever have an opportunity to do so to attend a Messianic Seder you will learn A LOT!


Blessings

Pastor George (The Messianic Mennonite!)

Click to expand...

Wonderful Pastor George,

I have seen one, and it changed my view of the whole Lord's supper in light of the Sader it takes on a whole new meaning which was forgien to me.

Peace to u,

Bill

Now this process was known in Biblical times and the result is what we now translate into "strong drink" there is a huge difference between a beverage that is 1.5 - 3% alcohol to one that is 18 - 21 % alcohol.

Click to expand...

Then how did people become drunk? Drink 20 gallons of grape juice?

Did they have any strong drinks at all in biblical times?

Abba said:

Then how did people become drunk? Drink 20 gallons of grape juice?

Did they have any strong drinks at all in biblical times?

Click to expand...

Yes they did have strong drink in biblical times it is mentioned many times in the Bible. And yes you can get drunk on what they called wine which is NOT grape juice. But it is not nearly as strong as what we call wine today. Mind you I think you would be awefully sick from drinking it but yes you can get drunk from it.


PG

Nehemiah_Center said:

This wine was about as strong as a weak beer today. This because they did not add aditional sugar to the mash. Adding sugar and yeast to the mash allows the alcohol making process to continue far beyond what would be natural (This what G-d had designed)

Click to expand...

This simply isn't true. Sugar is not added to today's wine. The sugar that is fermented is the natural sugar in the grapes. Now, I suppose if you wanted to make a very low-alcohol wine, you could harvest the grapes while still sour, so they would not have as much sugar to ferment. I'm not aware that this was done in biblical times. But having tasted Kosher wine, I can tell you for sure that modern Jewish vintners don't do anything like that!

Anyway, you certainly don't have to add sugar to wine to get the alcohol content of modern wine. There is plenty of sugar in the grapes to produce any wine you can buy today.

Crazy Liz said:

This simply isn't true. Sugar is not added to today's wine. The sugar that is fermented is the natural sugar in the grapes. Now, I suppose if you wanted to make a very low-alcohol wine, you could harvest the grapes while still sour, so they would not have as much sugar to ferment. I'm not aware that this was done in biblical times. But having tasted Kosher wine, I can tell you for sure that modern Jewish vintners don't do anything like that!

Anyway, you certainly don't have to add sugar to wine to get the alcohol content of modern wine. There is plenty of sugar in the grapes to produce any wine you can buy today.

Click to expand...

Well Liz I respectfully disagree with you as one who in a past life has made wine. But we can disagree on this. I don't think at the end of the day whoever is wrong is in danger of the flames of hell

From what I remember we had to add sugar and yeast to the mash to get the alcohol content up once the sugar is consumed alcohol production stops same if the yeast die. They die when the alcohol content gets too high.

And if you have ever had like MD 20/20 I think you would find quickly that it had quite a bit of sugar added to it. (It does taste like cough syrup)


In part here is a part of a recipie for high alcohol wine
- Adding Sugar For High Alcohol

Many recipes will find for producing high alcohol wines will call for 2 or 3 pounds of sugar per each gallon. And, this is in addition to the sugars that are already being naturally provided by the fruit involved. Adding all this sugar at the beginning of fermentation can result in a big problem.

Sugar is what the yeast turns into alcohol. So it stands to reason that you need a lot of sugar to make a lot of alcohol. But, when all the sugar is added at the beginning of fermentation, the concentration levels can be so high that the sugar can actually inhibit the fermentation. The sugar literally start acting as a preservative.

One easy way around this problem is to feed the sugar throughout the duration of the fermentation. For example, add enough sugar in the beginning to get the fermentation going. Then as the fermentation slows down, feed more sugar to it every few days until all the sugar called for in the recipe has been added. Optionally, you can keep adding sugar to the fermentation until the yeast has reached its limits.

When feeding sugar to a fermentation, the hydrometer can be a big help. When the Potential Alcohol reading gets close to zero, that is your cue to feed more sugar to the fermentation. In turn, the sugar will raise the reading again and the fermentation will again try to ferment towards zero on the scale.

This process can go on for several rounds before the yeast simply quits. But without the hydrometer, feeding sugar can be risky. You may be adding sugar to a wine that already has too much and is just slowing down because the yeast has reached it's limits instead of running out of sugar. The result can be a wine that is sweeter than you like.

Pastor George, I agree you can do this, but the good table wine you buy at the supermarket does not have sugar added like this. I understand how winemakers use a hydrometer. They often use it to decide when to harvest the grapes to get the sweetness or dryness they want along with the desired alcohol content.

I noticed that most beginning winemakers would start out making "late harvest" wine with the grapes left behind after the vineyard had been picked. These grapes are especially sweet, so the resulting wines tended to be both sweet and high in alcohol, without the addition of any sugar. It apparently takes more experience to be able to make a dry wine.

Pastor George,

Why do you drink Kosher wine? Do you also follow the Kosher dietary rules? I don't want to spark a big debate or anything. I just find it strange. I don't think it's wrong or right... I'm just wondering...

If you'd prefer to PM me the answer that's great..

As a recovering Alcoholic (4 years now praise JESUS!) I am glad we use grape juice. Some may argue with me but I know back then they used wine. But when we break bread I do not think Wine is needed as it is symbolic. So any drink should do well. Again sorry if people disagree. Am willing to listen.

I personally think it is more important not to lead a brother or sister to fall than to insist on wine with alcohol content. If i was a pastor i could not serve alcohol with a good conscience toward God.

Here's the thread I was looking for.

Bump.