- Jan 10, 2010
- 37,281
- 8,501
- Country
- United States
- Gender
- Male
- Faith
- Non-Denom
- Marital Status
- Married
- Politics
- US-Others
The reason you raised the idea of immortal dust in the first place was because of Paul's use of dust in 1Cor 15, so what Paul thought is very much the issue. I asked what you thought because you were quoting secular sources to make a claim about the immortality of dust that seem quite at odds with the tradition Christian view of this universe being temporal. Especially when you seemed so reticent to commit yourself to the idea. Showing that you as a Christian were uncomfortable with your argument was a stepping stone, clearing that argument out of the way, so we could get back to what Paul said.
Perhaps if you made a point from the 208 references rather than just linking to the verses.
What could I add? Read them and draw your own conclusions.
Last edited:
Upvote
0