• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Why do some think they need keys?

Status
Not open for further replies.

Gold Dragon

Senior Veteran
Aug 8, 2004
2,134
125
49
Toronto, Ontario
✟25,460.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Crazy Liz said:
I think GEL is referring to Matthew 16:19And I will give unto thee the keys of the kingdom of heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt bind on earth shall be bound in heaven: and whatsoever thou shalt loose on earth shall be loosed in heaven.

Yes. But what have those in search of these key identified as being those keys?
 
Upvote 0

repoland2

Regular Member
Feb 20, 2005
419
13
43
Alaska - USA
✟23,128.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Interesting... when I speak of 'keys' I am simply refering to answers to questions I ask. Actually, to be more specific, my missing 'key' is refering to a hidden answer that can answer one or more questions. A 'key' to me, is a missing link... needed answers.

Is this possibly what you mean?
 
Upvote 0

BT

Fanatic
Jan 29, 2003
2,320
221
51
Canada
Visit site
✟3,880.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Gold Dragon said:
Yes. But what have those in search of these key identified as being those keys?

LOL that I'd like to know. If you're interested I bet you that Liz could tell you what that whole section on binding and loosing is all about. If you've never heard the true interpretation before you'd probably be surprised.
 
Upvote 0

Gold Dragon

Senior Veteran
Aug 8, 2004
2,134
125
49
Toronto, Ontario
✟25,460.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
BT said:
LOL that I'd like to know. If you're interested I bet you that Liz could tell you what that whole section on binding and loosing is all about. If you've never heard the true interpretation before you'd probably be surprised.

I've heard (what I think you mean by true) an interpretation of binding and loosing regarding the rabbinical way of interpreting and applying the Mosaic law.

Here is one look at the binding and loosing passages, interestingly by someone from the Assemblies of God who are traditionally the most frequent abusers of this passage as being about the spirit realm. I commend them for being able to take a hard scriptural look at their own doctrine and finding it wanting.
http://www.cedarpark.org/CedarParkFtp/2000/binding.htm

My question was towards GEL about what folks she is referring to who feel they need these keys to heaven that appear to take Christ out of the picture of salvation and what those keys are to these folks.
 
Upvote 0

Gold Dragon

Senior Veteran
Aug 8, 2004
2,134
125
49
Toronto, Ontario
✟25,460.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Uncle Bud said:
From the title I figured it out, GD, can't you?

I didn't automatically connect this keys passage to the previous verse about Peter being the Rock and Apostolic Succession.

I did a search and found that most of the fundamentalist separatists criticize Catholics for their understanding of how they emphasize the apostolic sucession of Peter to the Popes who supposedly hold the "keys to the kingdom" made evident in Catholic Tradition.

Let's see what Catholics really believe about these keys.


I believe that apostolic succession is not the best way to interpret the "upon this Rock" and "keys of the kingdom" passage, but it is pretty easy to see why Catholics would choose to see this passage this way. However, this part of the Catechism must be taken in context with the part about wounds to unity.


So while we may disagree with them about the keys being Catholic Tradition held by apostolic succession in the Pope and the Catholic Church, I think it is more fair to include the fact that Catholics recognize salvation outside of this succession and Tradition.
 
Reactions: ps139
Upvote 0

Gold Dragon

Senior Veteran
Aug 8, 2004
2,134
125
49
Toronto, Ontario
✟25,460.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
I just wanted to post the entire passage from Matthew that we are discussing so we can see the context of the verses.


Fascinating passage that has produced so many different interpretations and caused so much dissention among Christians. What did Jesus actually say here? Try to remove the whole historical backdrop of all the different schisms in the Church and interpretations about spiritual warfare.
 
Upvote 0

ZiSunka

It means 'yellow dog'
Jan 16, 2002
17,006
284
✟46,267.00
Faith
Christian
It was Peter's confession of faith in Christ that was the key to heaven, not Peter himself. And confessions of faith continue to be the keys to heaven. Whenever someone refuses to confess Christ, they remain bound on earth and in heaven, meaning they are still condemned under the law, but when they confess Christ, they are loosed on earth and in heaven, meaning they are free from condemnation under the law.

Just a quick thought on this whole passage. Jesus often spoke in metaphors and similies so using the metaphor of the keys for a confession of faith wouldn't be unusual or out of context for him.
 
Upvote 0

SumTinWong

Living with BPD
Apr 30, 2004
6,469
744
In a house
Visit site
✟25,386.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
My how magnanomous of them, as if it were actually up to them.
 
Upvote 0

Miss Shelby

Legend
Feb 10, 2002
31,286
3,286
59
✟114,636.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
I don't know. But I have heard individual Christians say that they each have the keys. Why think they personally need to have them, I do not know.

Michelle
 
Upvote 0

SumTinWong

Living with BPD
Apr 30, 2004
6,469
744
In a house
Visit site
✟25,386.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Others
Gold Dragon said:
It isn't up to them. But they acknowledge it.

Just like it isn't up to us if Catholics are saved, but we can acknowleged that some of them are.
So I guess I am wondering why it is "fair to include" the passage that they think there is salvation outside the succesion and tradition, when it has no bearing on the conversation.
 
Upvote 0

Gold Dragon

Senior Veteran
Aug 8, 2004
2,134
125
49
Toronto, Ontario
✟25,460.00
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Uncle Bud said:
So I guess I am wondering why it is "fair to include" the passage that they think there is salvation outside the succesion and tradition, when it has no bearing on the conversation.

GEL's initial point was that some feel that the keys are necessary when Jesus is all we need. The Catholic view on protestants being saved without the Catholic "keys" would suggest that they do not view their "keys" as necessarily being needed for salvation, although their argument is that without their "keys" we have an imperfect communion with the Catholic Church, which we don't necessarily seek.

 
Upvote 0

ZiSunka

It means 'yellow dog'
Jan 16, 2002
17,006
284
✟46,267.00
Faith
Christian
But doesn't catholicism say that a person has to agree that the catholic church is the one true church and has all authority on earth (the magisteriim) in order to be saved? Christians who do not acknowledge the magisterium of the catholic church cannot be saved. They agree that some of us are being saved, but only those who agree to catholicism's terms.
 
Upvote 0

Miss Shelby

Legend
Feb 10, 2002
31,286
3,286
59
✟114,636.00
Faith
Catholic
Marital Status
Private
This is a misconception, lambslove, and I am not debating you, I am simply telling you that you are misinformed about the Catholic teaching on salvation. You, as a Protestant, do not have to adhere to or even agree with Catholic teaching in order to be saved, according to the Church.This is simply untrue.

Michelle
 
Upvote 0
Status
Not open for further replies.