Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Uh, no, since evolution is a continuous process, and the conditions required to make said process stop do not exist, our species remaining unchanged would defy evolutionary theory entirely.
But they do change genetically, remember that the majority of mutations don't have a an affect on the physiology of an organism at all. Even in situations in which any morphological change is selected against, there will still be neutral mutations that enter the population and change the genotype. Mutation never ceases.some species doesnt change even about 70-80 my (from morphological prepspective).
Sure, in terms of physical traits. Not in terms of the DNA directly, that will change over time to some extent no matter what. The change just might not be in the coding regions of DNA.so its possible according to evolution that a species (or a family) will stay basically the same for a very long time.
if its true that a dolphin can smell then the whole argument fail.I was investigating this question of dolphin OR genes myself. It would certainly be evidence for evolution. I came across a study though which found that at least some dolphin species can actually utilize those olfactory genes afterall:
Sensory Perception in Cetaceans: Part II—Promising Experimental Approaches to Study Chemoreception in Dolphins
Evolution is about change. It is irrelevant as to whether that change involves an increase, or a decrease in complexity. I am amazed that you are unaware of this basic fact and yet, armed with such ignorance you choose to contest the reality of evolution. I am curious as to where you picked up this erroneous idea. Would you enlighten me?
Correct. The loss of functionality is due to a change in the genotype and that change, by definition, is evolution.Could you further elaborate on this point? Is your understanding that the degeneration of a complex system to the point where it loses functionality represents an example of evolution?.
In its new environment it appears that the olfactory system is of little benefit to the dolphin. However, its maintenance demands resources that could be better employed elsewhere. So, yes its loss would be a benefit and yes that is evolution.In the OP's example, we have a functional olfactory system that degrades over time and becomes non-functional. Is this evolution? Does the dolphin gain some sort of advantage by not having a functional olfactory system anymore?
If I have a house-clean and throw out an old stove I once cooked on, along with a once serviceable chair that is now missing a leg, has the quality of my house improved, or decayed? I hope the answer is obvious and the analogy clear, but ask or challenge if they are not.Perhaps you could argue that the dolphin is not disadvantaged by the loss of it's olfactory system so that individuals without a functional olfactory system survived and propagated, but why did the loss of an olfactory system become fixed within the population?
Either it had to have provided a significant survival benefit or only dolphins without a function olfactory system survived for someone other unrelated reason. If the former case could be somehow proven, then perhaps we would have evolution, but if the latter is the case all we have is decay.
Either it had to have provided a significant survival benefit or only dolphins without a function olfactory system survived for someone other unrelated reason. If the former case could be somehow proven, then perhaps we would have evolution, but if the latter is the case all we have is decay.
A genetic change. No genetic material is lost.i think that in either cases there is evolution. since in both case its a genetic loss.
The genes became non-functional; still available for repurposing in the long-term.the OR were lost.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?