Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
I wonder why that is. Is it because you don't feel any pressure to change when you talk to them?
I come on here because I am intrigued by religious faith.
My partner is a committed Christian, she says she has a personal relationship with God, she says she feels his presence when she's in church. She reads the bible every day, goes to a house group etc. I respect her faith, I believe she is sincere but I just don't get it.
I go to church with her and listen to the talks and for me they are just a series of stories, some more believable than others and some so ludicrous as to be beyond belief, but for her it's all ok as it's in the Bible.
So I thought I'd join a Christian forum to see if there is any logical arguments or anything else I am missing which would make me understand how any rational human being can believe all that Christianity tells them.
I do find the discussions interesting, but there has been nothing (yet?) to make me think that the Bible is anything more than fiction.
I have also asked occasionally on here for clarification of some issues in the Christian church, or subjects I have heard in her church - does God have a plan for everyone, why doesn't god make himself known to non believers, is the devil real, did Adam and Eve exist, where is hell, what are angels and where do they hang around - those type of questions and the answers have often been brilliantly contradictory.
To share my perspective, to learn, and to find holes in my argument.
I had a very psychologically troubling time losing my faith, and I can't stomach the idea of pushing any theist into that direction. Although I do discuss my atheism sometimes, and I will try to correct people who have erroneous ideas about atheists.
Did you figure out why?
Pretty much, but that's a long and probably for most very disturbing story.
I interpret it to means that you apply a discipline to filter ideas before you believe to them to be true, and that you are prepared to discard your beliefs if new information comes along that tends to falsify them. It involves using Occam's Razor & applying specific heuristics when interpreting the world.What does it mean to be a rationalist?
I could see why someone might think parts of the Bible are untrue based on what they believe is possible, but I certainly wouldn't call it fiction. They use all of those exhaustive names and places listed and line them up with history.
I know different people respond to things differently. I'll bet you would grow to increasingly respect the Bible if you just kept reading it and didn't feel compelled to define what you think about it. Or in other words, some people would be huge fans of the Bible if they weren't being told it's a requirement.
I interpret it to means that you apply a discipline to filter ideas before you believe to them to be true, and that you are prepared to discard your beliefs if new information comes along that tends to falsify them. It involves using Occam's Razor & applying specific heuristics when interpreting the world.
Some stories in the bible are just, to me, obvious fiction. Amongst the most obviously (in my opinion) clearly not literally true are many in the Old Testament such as the creation story, Adam and Eve, the flood, the destruction of Sodom and Gomorah, Tower of Babel, Job, Jonah and the fish...... I could go on but you understand my point. If all those tales are just legendary, then the rest of the bible must be on the same basis. That doesn’t mean there aren’t some very relevant or important principles in the bible, but as i say, I do not see how it could possibly be divinely inspired or the “word of god”.
There are a large number of historical inaccuracies in the bible as well, for example there is no historical evidence that the Jews were ever enslaved in Egypt.
The New Testament has the fundamental problem of being written decades after the events it’s supoosed to have witnessed, and is written to justify the story it is telling. For example, the story of Jesus resurrection grows more spectacular in the later books, and for me is simply beyond rational belief.
I do however respect the bible as a very influential book, arguably the most influential book ever written, but that doesn’t make it anything more than just a book.
Pragmatic isn't a word that I would use to describe it, certainly not by the world's standards. It involves being detached from popular opinion.
Pretty much. There's no shortage of people who would like you to think like they do.Sorry, I think I misunderstood your position. So are you saying you attempt to remain as objective as possible regardless of the topic you are looking at?
How you feel about Christianity is pretty much how I feel about people in power in general. Anyone looking for a cause to leverage for ambition can be very destructive. Christianity doesn't even remotely have a monopoly on that. I'm not sure any one group does. Unfortunately, Christianity isn't immune to it either.
No, that was about not keeping their word, not hoarding.God struck early Christians dead in the book of Acts merely for hoarding wealth.
No, that was about not keeping their word, not hoarding.
And the multitude of them that believed were of one heart and of one soul: neither said any of them that ought of the things which he possessed was his own; but they had all things common.
Acts 4:32
Christianity developed under Rome and Paul was a Roman citizen. The adoption of Christianity by Rome was a matter of political expediency, Christian attitudes can be shaped by the state along the lines of Romans 13:1-2.Ok, thanks for the correction. Do you have an answer to my modified question with your correction?
Christianity developed under Rome and Paul was a Roman citizen. The adoption of Christianity by Rome was a matter of political expediency, Christian attitudes can be shaped by the state along the lines of Romans 13:1-2.
Why isn't Christianity immune? God struck early Christians dead in the book of Acts merely for hoarding wealth. Now pretty much anything goes. I don't understand that. Seems like he abandoned the church, doesn't it?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?