Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Crabs, lobsters, starfish and sea grass all live at the bottom of the sea as well but we never find them with trilobites.
Most of these folks, will deny any and all evidence no matter how powerful, at least publicly on this board and will never admit they are wrong.
Once your realize this reality, you will get past the annoyance and appreciate the entertainment value.
Why would they be living everywhere?
We find plenty of arthropod / crustacean "living fossils" in the lower rock records. Virtually unchanged for 300-500 "million years". This is expected under YEC and runs completely counter to Evolutionary predictions.
If a certain creature is missing it could just be because that species did not happen to be fossilized or that we just have not yet found that fossil. Ya know, the explanation Evolutionists invoke on a constant basis?
This is a textbook example of hand-waving an explanation away.And? It may have something to do with their behavior, or specific habitat.
and not a single flowering plant among them, despite them all sharing the same ecosystems as non-flowering plants.The Devonian rocks are where we see a great number of land plants appearing,
You do realize that there are multiple ecosystems represented in the Devonian right?about the same time as the amphibian animal ecosystems. This is what the Flood model would expect, a general ordering of fossils by ecosystem.
Sure, they could uproot themselves and run while the non-flowering plants couldn't.There may be some property of flowering plants that explain their order of appearance.
Why don't you explain why he is wrong instead of just being insulting?It's not like Evolution explains the origin of any of these things. Are you really suggesting an enigma warrants dismissal of a theory? Evolution would be left in the dust a century ago if you held such standards to it.
Completely untrue. Either you're totally ignorant, or totally bluffing.
We find plenty of arthropod / crustacean "living fossils" in the lower rock records. Virtually unchanged for 300-500 "million years". This is expected under YEC and runs completely counter to Evolutionary predictions.
If a certain creature is missing it could just be because that species did not happen to be fossilized or that we just have not yet found that fossil. Ya know, the explanation Evolutionists invoke on a constant basis?
Based on what?
The Devonian rocks are where we see a great number of land plants appearing, about the same time as the amphibian animal ecosystems. This is what the Flood model would expect, a general ordering of fossils by ecosystem.
Based on what? Are you kidding me? I actually have to explain the mobility differences between mammals and reptiles to you?
I already explained two alternate hypotheses that Evolutionists were prepared to pursue. 1) Birds could have evolved from a proto-mammal instead of dinosaurs. 2) Mammals could have evolved from amphibians instead of reptiles.
And any of these animals could have been said to evolve earlier if that is what the fossil record had begun to reveal in the 18th and 19th centuries.
Evolution would have accommodated nearly anything and constructed the modern theory around that data. It doesn't predict when reptiles or mammals are going to evolve, and phylogeny does not identify actual ancestors. Just accommodates with storytelling.
If what you say is true, then why are we no longer bound by the law to not eat shellfish, wear clothes of two different fabrics, and all the other laws?The Bible is never wrong.
Matthew 5:18 New International Version (for you to understand better)
For truly I tell you, until heaven and earth disappear, not the smallest letter, not the least stroke of a pen, will by any means disappear from the Law until everything is accomplished.
Same verse but in the King James Version:
For verily I say unto you, Till heaven and earth pass, one jot or one tittle shall in no wise pass from the law, till all be fulfilled.
In the Hebrew language a jot is the smallest letter, just like a dot.
This verse is saying that not one little dot, not one letter, not one word will disappear UNTIL EVERYTHING IS accomplished!! And that of course is after the earth and heaven will disappear (Révélations)
Do you get the powerful thing that Jesus just said right there? That's pretty powerful if you ask me.
If it were just one or two creatures, you'd have a point.
It's not. Whole orders are missing. Hundreds or specimens the are never found together, even though they live in similar habitats.
Really? Every other flood that has been studied does exactly that.Uh huh, cuz water just shakes and stirs everything up into a big jumbled mess right? Kind of like a cartoon?
Youtube this: Drama in the Rocks part 4/4
Moving water is a mechanical sorting mechanism. Hydrology experiments actually show how water forms distinct horizontal strata like we see all over the Earth today. A global flood would not just jumble things around willy-nilly like you imagine.
All animals that have ever existed on earth would not be capable of fitting on earth if they all existed, even briefly, at the same time. The physical planet isn't big enough. There would be mountains of plants and animals crushing each other from the weight.
And the population levels of those creatures that we see today could have been much lower at the time of the flood.
And if any or all of those specimens were found in the lower rocks, you would just say they "evolved" and remained in stasis for ~500 million years like you do everything else. It's not like any of this is evidence for Evolution.
If these fossils are hidden and never seen, how does Werner know about them?Dr Carl Werners book and DVD, Living Fossils, reveals that fossil researchers have found many modern bird remains with dinosaurs, yet museums do not display these fossils, thus keeping this information from the public. By keeping this information hidden, children and adults are indoctrinated with the false idea that animals changed over time (since the time of the dinosaurs), and that evolution is true.
Modern birds with dinosaurs
And the population levels of those creatures that we see today could have been much lower at the time of the flood.
And if any or all of those specimens were found in the lower rocks, you would just say they "evolved" and remained in stasis for ~500 million years like you do everything else. It's not like any of this is evidence for Evolution.
That has to be the most ridiculous argument I've ever heard. Congratulations.
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?