Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.
Frumious Bandersnatch said:If you are talking about old earth creationism of the Hugh Ross variety then the biggest threat is probably biology, specifically molecular biology with observations like shared pseudo genes and retroviral insertions.
I guess that would depend on what "ism" your talking about or even just what a "ism" is. YEC does not seem to be holding up, but GAP & OEC are doing just fine.Nathan Poe said:Insofar as creationism has been falsified, you're correct.
JohnR7 said:I guess that would depend on what "ism" your talking about or even just what a "ism" is. YEC does not seem to be holding up, but GAP & OEC are doing just fine.
Although GAP is more of a recreationist theory. It tends to lean at least somewhat on the KJV use of the word: replenish.
There is no "science" that is a threat to Creationism. Worldview based interpretations can disagree with Creationism, but there is not the least bit of empirical evidence that is a threat at all.evildead said:Pick from the larger fields of science and decide which is viewed as the biggest threat to Creationism?
That is why evolution relies on pseudo-science rather than observational science.Nathan Poe said:Any well-practiced science is a threat to superstition and mythology.
Not really. All that has to be rejected is the worldview based interpretations.Aeschylus said:To accept creationism you must reject all those sciences at a fundamental level.
evildead said:Pick from the larger fields of science and decide which is viewed as the biggest threat to Creationism?
Now that's an answer I didn't expect. But you know what? You may be right!mark kennedy said:None of the above, metaphysics is the biggest threat to Creationism.
Including the "Literal Bible" worldview...unclemonkey said:Not really. All that has to be rejected is the worldview based interpretations.
Can you do any better than "goo to you?"unclemonkey said:That is why evolution relies on pseudo-science rather than observational science.
Prove me wrong by presenting empirical evidence of genome building evolution.
At another forum I have been asking for empirical evidence that supports goo to you evolution for almost two years and to date not one bit of empirical evidence has been presented. Several attempts were made though demonstrating that the evolutonists at that forum don't know the difference between empirical evidence and interpretation.
What has been presented was all easily refutable as either 'bait and switch con', circular reasoning, unjustifiable assumptions or outright fraud.
Can you do any better?
Nonsense like this shows that nothing can threating YEC in the carefully closed minds of its brainwashed followers.unclemonkey said:That is why evolution relies on pseudo-science rather than observational science.
Prove me wrong by presenting empirical evidence of genome building evolution.
At another forum I have been asking for empirical evidence that supports goo to you evolution for almost two years and to date not one bit of empirical evidence has been presented. Several attempts were made though demonstrating that the evolutonists at that forum don't know the difference between empirical evidence and interpretation.
What has been presented was all easily refutable as either 'bait and switch con', circular reasoning, unjustifiable assumptions or outright fraud.
Can you do any better?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?
We use cookies and similar technologies for the following purposes:
Do you accept cookies and these technologies?