• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

Which Day of the Week is the Sabbath? (2)

Cliff2

Well-Known Member
Oct 7, 2004
3,831
63
74
✟26,993.00
Faith
SDA
BigDave said:
At the same time no one can say with certainty that the 7th day (as counted from Creation and/or the inception of the Sabbath law) is still on Saturday.

This is ask the question "has time been lost"

The answer is no.



The above quote was taken from here
 
Upvote 0

Cliff2

Well-Known Member
Oct 7, 2004
3,831
63
74
✟26,993.00
Faith
SDA
Click here for Sabbath info

<H1>THE SABBATH

HAS TIME BEEN LOST?
</H1>
 
Upvote 0

Nazaroo

Joseph is still alive! (Gen 45.26)
Dec 5, 2005
2,626
68
clinging to Jesus sandalstrap
✟18,230.00
Faith
Christian
I think I have to agree with Tall73 that the argument from Jesus' silence is probably stronger than simple neutrality regarding the sabbath timing.

On the one hand, I have actually now found serious Qumran evidence not only of festival disputes, but also sabbath timing disputes.

But on the other, the authority of the Son of God / Messiah is overriding.
Even if Jesus knew the sabbath practiced by the Herodian priests was 'wrong',
he observed it for them without disputing timing. It is even stronger than I first thought, that if Jesus knew the timing was wrong but didn't restore that timing, that it is irrelevant. What this means is not that the timing is 'irrelevant' absolutely, but rather irrelevant to Jesus example.

What do I mean? I mean Jesus would have in that case moved the mountain to Mohammed' as it were, and we should follow suit, using Him as our pattern. To reach the House of Israel, Jesus adopted the current sabbath, (right or wrong). For the purpose of unity, we also should adopt, going the extra mile.

How could this apply in the modern context? Do we follow the Jews of Jesus' time? Probably not literally, but rather, we should follow the practices of our own time. It would be like the principle that when you sweep a floor, you sweep the dirt toward the center, or where the most dirt is, to efficiently collect it.

Since the sabbath is 'stable', we end up following it anyway. It has the momentum, and like a ball rolling down the hill, picks up dust (individuals). Obviously it is inconvenient to adopt a day no one else is using, or likely to adopt with us.
 
Upvote 0

Nazaroo

Joseph is still alive! (Gen 45.26)
Dec 5, 2005
2,626
68
clinging to Jesus sandalstrap
✟18,230.00
Faith
Christian
mysparrow said:
i was under the impression, according to jewish calendar , both past and present, that the sabbath is Saturday?
Well, its not so simple, as we discussed earlier in this thread:

One problem is that now the sabbath extends outside of the 'time zone(s)' of Israel and Palestine.

The second is that according to the wording of the sabbath, the Arctic and Antarctic Circles pose a severe problem for peoples in those areas.

Finally, since some coordination with the timing of the sabbath in Palestine seems required, an agreed mapping of the time zones must be defined and achieved.

This is the modern dilemma and task of the 'sabbath-keepers'.

The more ancient dispute of the 'relative' timing of the sabbath ('Saturday vs Sunday') is only one aspect of the sabbath puzzle.
 
Upvote 0

Normann

Well-Known Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,149
42
Victoria, Texas USA
✟24,022.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
BigDave said:
[/b]
.................
Seems pretty explicit to me. The Sabbath is specifically said to be the seventh day. Saturday is the seventh day so the Sabbath would fall in Saturday.
...................


Read it again...

Exodus 20:8-10
Remember the sabbath day, to keep it holy. [9] Six days shalt thou labour, and do all thy work: [10] But the seventh day is the sabbath of the Lord thy God: in it thou shalt not do any work, thou, nor thy son, nor thy daughter, thy manservant, nor thy maidservant, nor thy cattle, nor thy stranger that is within thy gates:

It does not say that the seventh day of the week is the Sabbath.

Work six days and rest the seventh!

If you work Wednesday through Monday, then Tuesday is your Sabbath!

IN THE MASTER'S SERVICE,
Normann
 
Upvote 0

Cliff2

Well-Known Member
Oct 7, 2004
3,831
63
74
✟26,993.00
Faith
SDA

Go back to Gen 2 and we see that after 6 days God made the next day holy. That happens to have been the 7th day.

Then read Ex 20:8-11 and it is not too hard to see that Saturday is the Sabbath, the 7th day of the week.

Click here for some more info on the Sabbath
 
Upvote 0

Montalban

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2004
35,424
1,509
58
Sydney, NSW
✟42,787.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
you've missed the point. IF according to your understanding the "High Priest" has been overtaken by Jesus, then why does that mean 'the entire priesthood' when the High Priest is just one rank AND Paul mentions other ranks as people filled those roles; bishops, deacons, priests.

Get back to me when you can actually explain that. Simply referring back to Hebrews still does not wash; let alone the idea that Paul has taken the idea (that Jesus did not say) to end the priesthood (or an aspect of it) and that you feel this is 'good', but any 'change' of Sabbath, (after Jesus) is bad.
tall73 said:
And an overseer is not a priest. He is not a go between to mediate between you and God. I also quoted Paul, that Jesus is our only mediator.
Well again that's your interpretation. Paul asks us to perform the Eucharist. Ignatius shows this too. Hey, just quote Hebrews again and say I'm making the Bible lie! IF anything your theory doesn't fit all these other facts. Mine does
tall73 said:
Except that you have not demonstrated the apostolic succession gave the same rights.
So, you're saying when the Apostles elected one to their own number he had lesser rights than what they'd been given? ! ?
tall73 said:
The only succession to the office of apostle was that of Judas,
The only one mentioned in the Bible. That does not mean that the church 'stopped' at the time of the writing of Acts. If it did, then the Bible itself would never have been compiled.
tall73 said:
and it was because the Scriptures said that someone must fill his station.
And? What was the significance of this?
tall73 said:
We don't see any replacement for James at his death.
That's false. He was succeeded by Symeon.
http://www.newadvent.org/cathen/08355a.htm
tall73 said:
In fact, the requirement was that they had been with Jesus. It is not a continuing office. That is why they appointed overseers, not apostles.
See above.
tall73 said:
Indeed, it is remembering the Lord's death, not sacrificing Him over and over.
That's false too. Had you read the words of Paul he says it's not just a commerative meal.
tall73 said:
Which is why He said I will not drink of the fruit of the vine again until heaven? He seems to still call it the fruit of the vine , and says it is a rememberance, not a sacrifice.
No, Jesus said His body is real food.
But as noted, you want to be selective what verses you want to read. Highlighting them and making them larger doesn't make them negate other verses.
 
Upvote 0

Montalban

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2004
35,424
1,509
58
Sydney, NSW
✟42,787.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
tall73 said:
But there is no mention of the office of priest as you define it, someone who is a mediator for you by offering Jesus again and again as a sacrifice. And I have in fact answered that multiple times and as usual you ignore it.
Repeating a just so does not equat to 'answering'.

I cited passages for you where the three offices are mentioned in the Bible. I also mentioned Ignatius.

I know that it can be frustrating for some when presented evidence.
 
Upvote 0

Montalban

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2004
35,424
1,509
58
Sydney, NSW
✟42,787.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
The whole nonsense about 'mediators' made by Tall73 is another attempt at selective use of evidence.

The mere fact Jesus chose 12 men to carry on His work is telling. He didn't leave the Bible behind for people to read for themselves and come to a knowledge of Jesus by themselves.
 
Upvote 0

Cliff2

Well-Known Member
Oct 7, 2004
3,831
63
74
✟26,993.00
Faith
SDA

You are not taking into account that it is the job of the Holy Spirit to give us wisdom and knowledge.

It is not me or any other person. We maybe able to present truth but it is the Holy Spirit that impresses the heart and convicts the soul.
 
Upvote 0

Normann

Well-Known Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,149
42
Victoria, Texas USA
✟24,022.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married


No Cliff, I won't click here; it is plain in the scripture that the Jews changed the day of the Sabbath after Pentecost every year.

You are preaching from a calendar; not the Bible.

2 Tim 2:15
IN THE MASTER'S SERVICE,
Normann
 
Upvote 0

Cliff2

Well-Known Member
Oct 7, 2004
3,831
63
74
✟26,993.00
Faith
SDA
Normann said:
No Cliff, I won't click here; it is plain in the scripture that the Jews changed the day of the Sabbath after Pentecost every year.

You are preaching from a calendar; not the Bible.

2 Tim 2:15
IN THE MASTER'S SERVICE,
Normann

See if this works

http://www.seventh-day.org/index.html

Then click onto whatever subject you desire to study.
 
Upvote 0

oldsage

Veteran
Nov 4, 2005
1,307
70
56
Pinellas Park, FL
✟1,833.00
Faith
Christian
Marital Status
In Relationship
Politics
US-Others
Cliff2 said:
See if this works

http://www.seventh-day.org/index.html

Then click onto whatever subject you desire to study.

Cliff, he was saying he won't look at your evidence. not that the link didn't work. He doesn't care what you have to show him.

Chris
 
Upvote 0

Cliff2

Well-Known Member
Oct 7, 2004
3,831
63
74
✟26,993.00
Faith
SDA
oldsage said:
Cliff, he was saying he won't look at your evidence. not that the link didn't work. He doesn't care what you have to show him.

Chris

Even I as a Sabbath keeper (7th day) must always be willing to at least look at what others say.

If it makes no sense then it can be thrown out but at least look.
 
Upvote 0

Montalban

Well-Known Member
Jan 20, 2004
35,424
1,509
58
Sydney, NSW
✟42,787.00
Faith
Eastern Orthodox
Marital Status
Single
Cliff2 said:
You are not taking into account that it is the job of the Holy Spirit to give us wisdom and knowledge.
You are not taking into account that the whole Tall73 wording of 'mediators' is a straw-man, to begin with. No where have I referred to priests by this term.

John 20:21-23 Has Jesus picking a particular group out and sending them out.

They in turn ordained deacons Acts 6:6 and Acts 13:3

"The sacrament of the Eucharist (Holy Communion) is the sacrament by which Christ unites Himself with us today. He comes to transubstantiate and change our lives into His beautiful life"
Coniaris, A. M., (1982), "Introducing the Orthodox Church: It's Faith and Life", (Light & Life Publishing; Minnesota), p147

Why would they even bother to appoint James to head the church in Jerusalem?

Cliff2 said:
It is not me or any other person. We maybe able to present truth but it is the Holy Spirit that impresses the heart and convicts the soul.
Isn't it interesting that the Holy Spirit came to those that the Apostles had laid hands upon. As Tall73 seems to think that the Apostelship ended there; what provisions then happened for the Holy Spirit to come after they'd gone?

At least you don't just repeat "HEBREWS 8" and call that discussion

Specifically Tall73 missed St. Paul saying it's not just a 'meal'

1 Corinthians 11

20 When you come together, it is not the Lord's Supper you eat



It is NOT the "Lord's Supper". If you want to 'eat' a meal, do so at home...



21 for as you eat, each of you goes ahead without waiting for anybody else. One remains hungry, another gets drunk. 22 Don't you have homes to eat and drink in?



He repeats that this was 'received' from Jesus

23 For I received from the Lord what I also passed on to you:



Then in the same passage he repeats Jesus' words (having already said that it is NOT a 'combative meal'; the Lord's Supper). It is referring to Jesus' 'new covenant'



The Lord Jesus, on the night he was betrayed, took bread, 24 and when he had given thanks, he broke it and said, "This is my body, which is for you; do this in remembrance of me." 25 In the same way, after supper he took the cup, saying, "This cup is the new covenant in my blood; do this, whenever you drink it, in remembrance of me."



And it has a sacred purpose...

26 For whenever you eat this bread and drink this cup, you proclaim the Lord's death until he comes.



This also suggests it's not a 'one-off' thing.



And He again associates it with the actual body and blood of Christ

27 Therefore, whoever eats the bread or drinks the cup of the Lord in an unworthy manner will be guilty of sinning against the body and blood of the Lord.

To sin against the body and blood you drink and eat is to sin against the very body and blood of Christ; they are alike. To sin against one is the same as to sin against the other...



Most telling of all he says you must recognise this when you partake of them...

29 For anyone who eats and drinks without recognizing the body of the Lord eats and drinks judgment on himself.

If you don't recognise that it's the body and blood of the Lord, you bring judgment upon yourself.



And, he repeats again that it's not just a communal meal...

33 So then, my brothers, when you come together to eat, wait for each other. 34 If anyone is hungry, he should eat at home, so that when you meet together it may not result in judgment.





SO, if Jesus has replaced the HIGH PRIEST, it is obvious that other positions are there; they are all given in the NT. They are confirmed by early Christian writers

St. Ignatius, taught by St. Peter himself, and writing before the Bible was compiled wrote...

Epistle to the Ephesians

CHAPTER 5

5:1 For if I in a short time had such converse with your bishop, which was not after the manner of men but in the Spirit, how much more do I congratulate you who are closely joined with him as the Church is with Jesus Christ and as Jesus Christ is with the Father, that all things may be harmonious in unity.

http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/ignatius-ephesians-lightfoot.html

This reflects the Epistle;

Titus 1:7 Since a bishop is entrusted with God's work, he must be blameless&#8211;not overbearing, not quick-tempered, not given to drunkenness, not violent, not pursuing dishonest gain.



We take in the bread because it is no longer mere bread...

Epistle to the Ephesians

20:2 especially if the Lord should reveal aught to me. Assemble yourselves together in common, every one of you severally, man by man, in grace, in one faith and one Jesus Christ, who after the flesh was of David's race, who is Son of Man and Son of God, to the end that ye may obey the bishop and presbytery without distraction of mind; breaking one bread, which is the medicine of immortality and the antidote that we should not die but live for ever in Jesus Christ.

http://www.earlychristianwritings.com/text/ignatius-ephesians-lightfoot.html
 
Upvote 0

Normann

Well-Known Member
Mar 30, 2005
1,149
42
Victoria, Texas USA
✟24,022.00
Faith
Non-Denom
Marital Status
Married
oldsage said:
Cliff, he was saying he won't look at your evidence. not that the link didn't work. He doesn't care what you have to show him.

Chris

No that's not what I am saying. I am saying give me some scripture. Cliff is giving me the web-site of the SDA.

I want it from the Bible.

IN THE MASTER'S SERVICE,
Normann
 
Upvote 0

Cliff2

Well-Known Member
Oct 7, 2004
3,831
63
74
✟26,993.00
Faith
SDA

Which Day of the Week is the Sabbath?

What you have wrote does it tell us "Which Day of the Week is the Sabbath"
 
Upvote 0