• Starting today August 7th, 2024, in order to post in the Married Couples, Courting Couples, or Singles forums, you will not be allowed to post if you have your Marital status designated as private. Announcements will be made in the respective forums as well but please note that if yours is currently listed as Private, you will need to submit a ticket in the Support Area to have yours changed.

  • CF has always been a site that welcomes people from different backgrounds and beliefs to participate in discussion and even debate. That is the nature of its ministry. In view of recent events emotions are running very high. We need to remind people of some basic principles in debating on this site. We need to be civil when we express differences in opinion. No personal attacks. Avoid you, your statements. Don't characterize an entire political party with comparisons to Fascism or Communism or other extreme movements that committed atrocities. CF is not the place for broad brush or blanket statements about groups and political parties. Put the broad brushes and blankets away when you come to CF, better yet, put them in the incinerator. Debate had no place for them. We need to remember that people that commit acts of violence represent themselves or a small extreme faction.

Whey do science & religion have to be at odds with one another?

BananaSlug

Life is an experiment, experience it!
Aug 26, 2005
2,454
106
41
In a House
✟25,782.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
So here we see one example of a creationist who believes there is no physical evidence of creation vs. others who believe such evidence is everywhere.

Again, if there is no physical evidence that shows the earth was created by the direct actions of a deity, what basis do we have to believe one religion over another?
 
Upvote 0

BananaSlug

Life is an experiment, experience it!
Aug 26, 2005
2,454
106
41
In a House
✟25,782.00
Faith
Atheist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Libertarian
No.

Phenomenon- any observable occurrence. In scientific usage, a phenomenon is any event that is observable, however commonplace it might be, even if it requires the use of instrumentation to observe it. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pendulum
 
Upvote 0

AV1611VET

SCIENCE CAN TAKE A HIKE
Site Supporter
Jun 18, 2006
3,856,213
52,662
Guam
✟5,154,754.00
Country
United States
Gender
Male
Faith
Baptist
Marital Status
Married
Politics
US-Republican
No.

Phenomenon- any observable occurrence. In scientific usage, a phenomenon is any event that is observable, however commonplace it might be, even if it requires the use of instrumentation to observe it.
Is faith a 'natural phenomenon'?
 
Upvote 0

Gracchus

Senior Veteran
Dec 21, 2002
7,199
821
California
Visit site
✟38,182.00
Faith
Pantheist
Marital Status
Single
Politics
US-Others
A good reference for my origianal post is "Summa Of Theology" by St Thomas Auinas.

I remember being surprised that Aquinas actually did discuss how many angels could dance on the head of a pin.

The section titled The Cause Of Existing: God
I left it out because I was trying to be breif. If your not farmiliar with the text, the bottom line is that everything has a first cause.

Even if we grant that everything has a cause, we need not grant that everything has a first cause. The chain of causation might be an infinite regression.

Nothing can call itself into existance. Example a stone can't throw itself. If you believe the big bang theory what caused the big bang. Aquinas believed that if you went back to the first cause, no matter what it was, you find God.

I don't remember how he addressed the question of what caused God.

God created man from the dust of the earth in a day.

Dust isn't very cohesive. Perhaps he used mud?

We have the raw ingrediants, but not the recipe he used.

My mama told me that first he didn't bake the mud long enough and out came the white man. Then he baked it too long and out came the black man. Then he used to much butter, and out came the orientals. And finally, he got the recipe right and out came the Native American. My mama said it, so it must be so.

Later we find out that to God a day is a thousand years & draw the conclusion that time is relative.

Einstein's conclusion was reached more rigorously.

Hope that helps.

Not so much, no.

I like the house analogy though.
What house? Must have fallen down during the earthquake.

 
Upvote 0
A

anyman

Guest


The point is that if you believe the Earth was created, you don't have to reject a scientific explination as to the fine details. I'm not trying to prove anything or convert anyone. I'm saying that you don't have to reject science over religion or vice versa. I think the issue your refering to is wether or not it just happened or if there was an inteligent design.
 
Upvote 0
A

anyman

Guest


Again i'm not debating creation vs. evolution. If your interested in that there's an apologetics thread. The point is that if you do believe in the God of the Bible you don't have to shun science.
 
Upvote 0